45 research outputs found

    Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options for German wine production

    Get PDF
    In the light of a dire need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from food value chains, this paper analyses GHG emissions from wine production based on primary data from 5 wineries, one wine cellar and 9 grape producers in Germany and explores main emission sources based on their contributions to variance. Considering system boundaries from cradle to gate we found a 90% confidence interval for results between 0.753 and 1.069 kg CO2e per bottle of wine. Main contributors to variance were bottle weight (31%), electricity usage (18%), heat (11%), yield (−9%), and diesel use in vineyards (9%). Looking at production process phases, 19% of emissions resulted from the production of wine grapes, while 81% were attributable to the winery phase, mainly to the packaging materials (57%). Exploring the mitigation potential of a reduction in bottle weight, reuse of glass bottles, increase in packaging volume and renewable energies, we found that the reuse of glass bottles deserves close attention from wine producers, consumers, and policy makers who strive for an effective decarbonization of the wine value chain. The mitigation potential of the reuse of an average bottle exceeds the mitigation potential from a reduction in bottle weight by more than threefold. A combination of the replacement of grid electricity by renewable energies, bottle weight reduction and reuse can curb GHG emissions per bottle of wine by 47%.Peer reviewe

    Indirect water demand of dairy farm buildings

    Get PDF
    Water is needed in agriculture not only to ensure plant growth and to feed livestock, but also indirectly in pre-chains to produce machines, equipment, buildings and operating materials.  This water is referred to as indirect water.  The focus of this article is on the indirect water demand for farm buildings in milk production, which was assessed for the first time.  Four standardized barn types for dairy cows, a young cattle barn, a calf barn, and storage facilities were investigated.  The materials and masses of each building type and equipment were determined.  The water needed in the process of material production was taken from the Ecoinvent database.  The indirect water demand for livestock houses ranges from 1.4 to 1.9 m³ animal place-1 yr-1 and varies marginally between barn variants.  For calf houses and young cattle houses, indirect water demand ranges from 0.3 to 0.8 m³ animal place-1 yr-1.  The demand for indirect water for technical equipment ranges from 0.2 to 0.7 m³ animal place-1 yr-1.  The indirect water demand for storage ranges from 0.01 to 0.5 m3 m-3 yr-1.  Related to milk production, the indirect water demand is with 0.3 L kg-1 milk negligibly low.   Keywords: indirect water, consumptive water, livestock buildings, pre-chains, German

    Influence of silage additives on methane yield and economic performance of selected feedstock

    Get PDF
    Ensiling is an appropriate way of preserving feedstock for anaerobic digestion. Biological and chemical silage additives were used to improve silage quality and to prevent silage losses due to aerobic instability. Lab-scale experiments were conducted using alfalfa, grass and maize. Silages without additives and with chemical and biological additives were compared to the fresh material as well. The effect of silage additives was investigated using batch anaerobic digestion tests and comparing the results on an organic dry matter basis as well as on a hectare basis. In an economic assessment the costs of silage additives were compared to the additional proceeds which can be achieved from improving digestability and preventing silage losses. There seems to be some evidence that there is a correlation between organic acid content of silages and methane yield on organic dry matter basis. Considering aerobic instability of opened silos the additional income can over-compensate the costs of the application of chemical additives

    Agricultural Water Management in Brandenburg

    Get PDF
    The present study explores whether regional water resources can be used more efficiently by Brandenburg’s farming systems. A description of agriculture in Brandenburg today is followed by a systematic analysis of measures to raise the water efficiency. Brandenburg’s agricultural systems are divided into three sections: soil, plant production and livestock farming. Within these sections measures to increase water efficiency are listed and analysed with reference to five objective criteria for raising water use efficiency. In view of the complexity of farming systems in Brandenburg, general measures to raise water use efficiency could not be derived. Site-specific tillage practices and crop patterns adjusted to recent weather conditions may reflect the specific diversity of Brandenburg more efficiently

    Case Study of Effects of Mineral N Fertilization Amounts on Water Productivity in Rainfed Winter Rapeseed Cultivation on a Sandy Soil in Brandenburg (Germany) over Three Years

    Get PDF
    Detailed knowledge about farm management practices and related hydrological processes on water productivity is required to substantially increase the productivity of precipitation water use in agriculture. With this in mind, the effect of the nitrogen (N) fertilization level on water productivity of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) was analyzed using a modeling approach and field measurements. In this first study of interception loss and water productivity in winter oilseed rape, the crop was cultivated in a field experiment on a sandy soil in Brandenburg (Germany) under five nitrogen fertilization treatments with 0, 60, 120, 180, and 240 kg mineral N ha−1 a−1. Based on data from three vegetation periods the water flows and the mass-based water productivity of seeds were calculated on a daily basis with the AgroHyd Farmmodel modeling software. As recommended from the recently developed guidelines of the FAO on water use in agriculture, the method water productivity was applied and uncertainties associated with the calculations were assessed. Economic profit-based water productivity (WPprofit) was calculated considering the costs of fertilization and the optimal level of N fertilization, which was determined based on a quadratic crop yield response function. Mean water productivity of seeds varied from 1.16 kg m−3 for the unfertilized control sample to 2.00 kg m−3 under the highest fertilization rate. N fertilization had a clearly positive effect on WPprofit. However, fertilizer application rates above 120 kg N ha−1 a−1 led to only marginal increases in yields. Water productivity of seeds under the highest fertilization rate was only insignificantly higher than under medium application rates. The optimum N level for the maximal WPprofit identified here was higher with 216 kg N ha−1 a−1. The conclusion is that further research is needed to investigate the interaction between fertilization and other farm management practices.Bundesministerium für Ernährung und LandwirtschaftPeer Reviewe

    Energy balance, greenhouse gas emissions, and profitability of thermobarical pretreatment of cattle waste in anaerobic digestion

    Get PDF
    AbstractIn this study modeled full scale application of thermobarical hydrolysis of less degradable feedstock for biomethanation was assessed in terms of energy balance, greenhouse gas emissions, and economy. Data were provided whether the substitution of maize silage as feedstock for biogas production by pretreated cattle wastes is beneficial in full-scale application or not.A model device for thermobarical treatment has been suggested for and theoretically integrated in a biogas plant. The assessment considered the replacement of maize silage as feedstock with liquid and/or solid cattle waste (feces, litter, and feed residues from animal husbandry of high-performance dairy cattle, dry cows, and heifers). The integration of thermobarical pretreatment is beneficial for raw material with high contents of organic dry matter and ligno-cellulose: Solid cattle waste revealed very short payback times, e.g. 9months for energy, 3months for greenhouse gases, and 3years 3months for economic amortization, whereas, in contrast, liquid cattle waste did not perform positive replacement effects in this analysis
    corecore