Refleksi Satu Tahun Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja: Quo Vadis Jaminan Kesejahteraan dan Keadilan di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19

Undang-undang Cipta Kerja dari pengesahan hingga implementasinya selalu menjadi perdebatan di berbagai golongan masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa quo vadis kesejahteraan dan keadilan bagi masyarakat dari adanya Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan yaitu yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan kasus. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian bahwa Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja berdampak pada hilangnya kesejahteraan dan keadilan masyarakan akibat adanya proyek strategis nasional. UU Cipta Kerja semakin memudahkan penggunaan dan penguasaan lahan daripada meningkatkan ekonomi. Di sisi lain, UU Cipta Kerja justru memperkuat kekuatan oligarki untuk mempertahankan kekayaan, sehingga menambah penderitaan rakyat di masa pandemi Covid-19

Halal Certification Obligations in 2019: Is It Possible to be Applied in Indonesia?

The research is financed by Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, the Republic of Indonesia. Abstract This study aims to demonstrate the implementation of the halal certification system and highlight the problems in the Halal certification process in Indonesia and focus on the process, information flow and actors involved in the Halal certification process. This study attempts to generate significant findings in the establishment of implementing regulations or technical guidelines in the halal certification process. The perpetrators of SME’s become the object of research considering its obligation in conducting halal certification. The results of this study are 32% of SME’s in the City of Magelang know the existence of UUJPH and who approved the halal certification obligations exist in 2019 only 25%. The solution of the problem is (1) Socialization of UUJPH to SME’s and related offices. (2) Cross subsidies, or other policies so that the cost is light, it would be better not to pay. (3) There is a need for rules as a guideline for implementation and technical guidance. (4) Easy conditions and fast process. (5) Immediately established BPJPH at the city/county level or residency. Keywords: Halal Certification Obligations, SME’s, Halal Product Guarantee DOI: 10.7176/JLPG/82-0

AI in Law: Urgency of the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence on Law Enforcement in Indonesia

Introduction to The Problem: The advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has marked the beginning of an age in digital technology, social economics, human needs, and professional conduct. A previous study shows a significant difference in the level of accuracy between Artificial Intelligence (AI) machines and human advocates in which AI machines turned out to be more accurate than advocates. However, the challenges are related to the inadequacy of laws in responding to the development of AI. Furthermore, Indonesian law enforcement officers lack awareness of the advantages of using AI to support their profession.Purpose/Objective Study: Hence, this study aims to analyze the urgency of implementing AI for law enforcement in providing legal services and the law enforcement process.Design/Methodology/Approach: The method used in this research is normative, empirical research with Statute and Conceptual Approach. Furthermore, the data uses primary and secondary data sources. Primary data was obtained through interviews with law enforcement officials. Meanwhile, secondary data sources are primary and secondary legal materials. Furthermore, it will be analyzed qualitatively and presented descriptively.Findings: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is crucial in assisting in developing services and law enforcement, especially for Indonesian law enforcement, which still relies on manual or conventional means to carry out its duties. Artificial Intelligence (AI) can bring benefits in terms of time efficiency and accuracy in assessing cases urgently needed by law enforcement. In terms of law enforcement's perception of the use of AI, they are placed as assistants who cannot entirely replace the law enforcement profession since Artificial Intelligence (AI) lacks human traits that law enforcement officers must possess.Paper Type: Research Articl

The Roles of Local Governments in Accommodating the Registration of SME’s Product Trademarks

One of the manifestations of the government's alignment with the protection and development of MSMEs is the issuance of Law Number 20 of 2008 concerning Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (UU MSMEs). Protection of MSME products is protection for products consisting of goods and/or services. Every product, both goods and services, has material and immaterial wealth. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), especially trademarks, are immaterial wealth for MSME products that need legal protection. This study aims to analyze the role of the Kebumen district government in accommodating the registration of MSME product brands. This study uses a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach. The legal materials used in this study include primary and secondary legal materials. Primary legal materials are Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications, Regulation of the Regent of Kebumen Number 71 of 2016 concerning Position, Organizational Structure, Duties and Functions, as well as Work Procedures for the Department of Manpower and Cooperatives, MSME (MSME Kebumen Regent Regulation). Secondary legal materials are journaled articles, law books and websites. The results of the study indicate the role of the Kebumen Regency Government in accommodating trademark registration on MSME products in Kebumen Regency through the KUMKM Service and the KUMKM Integrated Business Service Center (PLUT). Activities carried out are in the form of socialization, consulting services, training, and assistance for MSMEs in trademark registration at the DJKI to protect the law and develop MSMEs

STRICT LIABILITY SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PENEGAKAN HUKUM LINGKUNGAN

Penyelesaian sengketa lingkungan hidup saat ini masih menggunakan prinsip Liability based on Fault yang membuat korban harus membuktikan unsur kesalahan dari pelaku. Sedangkan dalam penegakan hukum lingkungan masih ada dasar pertanggungjawaban dengan prinsip Strict Liability, yaitu korban tidak perlu melakukan pembuktian terhadap kesalahan pelaku apabila telah memenuhi unsur yang terdapat dalam Pasal 35 Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 1997 dan Pasal 88 Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009. Penelitian ini disusun karena ketertarikan penulis mengenai penyelesaian sengketa lingkungan hidup berdasarkan prinsip Strict Liability. Tujuan dari penelitian yang berjudul “Strict Liability sebagai Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan” ini adalah mengetahui urgensi Strict Liability dalam sengketa lingkungan dan upaya-upaya penerapan Strict Liability dalam sengketa lingkungan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum (legal research) dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Strict Liability merupakan prinsip pertanggungjawaban dalam sengketa lingkungan yang tidak menerapkan unsur kesalahan dalam aspek pertanggungjawabannya. Hal tersebut sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 1997 Pasal 35 dan dipertegas dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Pasal 88 dalam kegiatan kategori abnormally dangerous activity. Jadi dapat disimpulkan bahwa prinsip Strict Liability lebih menguntungkan korbannya, karena korban tidak perlu melakukan pembuktian jika pelaku melakukan kegiatan yang merugikan melainkan dapat langsung menuntut suatu pertanggungjawaban

AI in Law: How Artificial Intelligence Is Transforming the Legal Profession in Indonesia

The profess on the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has widely transformed a new era in the digital technology, social economic, human need and professional behavior. Eventually, artificial intelligence automates even more aspects of legal profession. Furthermore, AI allows the legal profession to automate lower-level tasks, freeing time to focus on complex analysis and client interaction. The research aims to know the literacy of legal professional on the use of AI. The methods used in this study are normative-empirical legal research. Furthermore, research uses primary data which obtained from questionary survey, secondary data i.e., law, books, journals and other related legal sources for research. Meanwhile, the research will analyze through descriptive qualitatively. The research shows that the literacy level of law enforcers in the use of AI is in the medium category. Data shows that 75% of legal professional shows their positive respond about the implementation of AI in their profession. While other shows, 8% of high percentage and 17% of low percentage

Forensic Medicine in Indonesia: The Application of Visum ET Repertum in Case Resolution

This research aimed at explaining important comprehension concerning with Forensic medicine in Indonesia: the application of visum et repertum in case resolution. As we know that, the community still have not known and comprehended about how important visum et repertum in law is. Moreover, it is often occurred uncompleted law well as the impact of not being supported by visum et repertum. This research utilized normative research method, which studied about medicine forensic and visum et repertum. Main material that was used in this research was data in form of health laws and regulations and also other data which were contained in books, journals and various scientific works and they related to the research theme. Furthermore, visum et repertum is one of important elements that cannot be abandoned in medical forensic process

Criminal Liability of People with Mental Disorders: Health Law Perspective

Criminal liability is a mechanism to determine whether or not a suspect may be held responsible for an action. Mental disorders are conditions that prevent someone from having the ability to take responsibility for their actions. The Indonesian Criminal Codes I and II provide a guide on the criminal liability of people with mental disorders. This is normative legal research with a focal point on inventorying written positive laws under legal principles and doctrines to discover the law in a case. The result shows that the judge has full authority to sentence offenders with mental disorders. Otherwise, they have to consider the facts at the trial and ask expert witnesses. We argue that imposing the sanction for perpetrators with mental disorders is not in line with Lex Neminem Cogit Ad Impossibilia, which is embedded in the Indonesian criminal code. Moreover, the judge needs to involve the psychiatrists to manage the suspect with a mental disorder in their decision

Chrisna Bagus Edhita Praja's Quick Files

The Quick Files feature was discontinued and it’s files were migrated into this Project on March 11, 2022. The file URL’s will still resolve properly, and the Quick Files logs are available in the Project’s Recent Activity