Provenance and clinical benefit of medicines introduced to the French market, 2008 to 2018

IMPORTANCE Both the commercial sector and academia play a vital role in medicine development. Ongoing debates exist on their contribution and the value of medicinal products entering the market. OBJECTIVE To identify the provenance and clinical benefit of medicines that entered the French market between 2008 and 2018. DESIGN AND SETTING In this cross-sectional study, the provenance of each medicine in the French market was established via a review of multiple sources documenting at least 2 matching findings per product. The clinical benefit was assigned using the matched scale developed from the Prescrire and Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) gradings. The χ2 test was used to analyze the proportions and frequencies of medicines graded by Prescrire and HAS by origin, therapeutic category, and clinical benefit. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The origins and therapeutic categories of medicines. Clinical benefit based on Prescrire and HAS grading. Concordance of Prescrire and HAS grading. RESULTS Of the 632 medicines that entered the French market between 2008 and 2018, 464 originated (73%) in the commercial sector, and 168 originated (27%) in the academic setting or in collaboration with commercial enterprises. Prescrire graded psychotropic agents (13/14 [93%]), whereas HAS graded respiratory agents (24/25 [96%]) as the highest percentage of medicines that provided no added benefit. Prescrire graded 360 medicines (77.6%) that originated in the industry and 108 medicines (64.3%) that originated in the academic setting (P = .001) to have no added clinical benefit. HAS assigned such grading to 331 ([71.3%] industry) vs 104 ([61.9%] academia) (P = .02). Based on the Prescrire grading, academia invented more medicines delivering some added benefit 57 (33.9%) vs 98 (21.1%) invented by industry (P = .001). HAS grading on some added benefit 51 ([30.4%] academia) vs 121 ([26.1%] industry) did not reach statistical significance (P = .29). However, HAS grading on substantial added clinical benefit reached statistical significance in favor of academia (13 [7.7%] vs 12 [2.6%] in the industry; P = .003), whereas Prescrire grading did not (1.8% academia vs 1.3% industry; P = .64). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE More than 70% of medicines that entered the French market during the 10-year period originated in the commercial sector. Although most medicines were not graded as providing clinical benefit, medicines originating in the academic setting were more likely to be graded as conferring clinical benefit than those originating in the commercial setting

The origin of first‐in‐class drugs: innovation versus clinical benefit

First-in-class (FIC) designation became a hallmark of innovation, however, even at the marketing authorization stage, little is known about the clinical benefits these products deliver. We identified the provenance of the FIC drugs that entered the French market from 2008 to 2018 and matched these medicines to the clinical benefit grading by Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) and Prescrire. Analyses were performed using descriptive statistics to present our findings by drug origin and therapeutic area and to establish the degree of concordance between HAS and Prescrire. Of the 135 FIC drugs identified, 71.1% (n = 96) originated from the industry, 16.3% (n = 22) from academia, and 12.6% (n = 17) from joint partnerships. Three therapeutic areas accounted for most FIC medications: antineoplastic (25.9%, N = 35), anti-infective (14.1%, N = 19), and metabolic (11.1%, N = 15) agents. HAS and Prescrire agreed on 60.74% of clinical benefit gradings. According to HAS, only 5% of all FIC drugs had substantial added benefit, and only 3%, according to Prescrire. HAS and Prescrire graded 45.9% and 68.2%, respectively, of FIC drugs as no clinical benefit and 48.9% and 28.9%, respectively, as some clinical benefit. FIC-designated drugs are primarily of industry (> 70%) rather than academic origin. We found that 55% of FIC medicines that entered the French market over the 10-year period deliver no additional clinical benefit. Whereas FIC medicines may represent important scientific advancements in drug development, in > 50% of cases, the new mode of action does not translate into additional clinical benefits for patients

Tissue-specific immunopathology in fatal COVID-19

Funding: Inflammation in COVID-19: Exploration of Critical Aspects of Pathogenesis (ICECAP) receives funding and support from the Chief Scientist Office (RapidResearch in COVID-19 programme [RARC-19] funding call, “Inflammation in Covid-19: Exploration of Critical Aspects of Pathogenesis; COV/EDI/20/10” to D.A.D., C.D.L., C.D.R., J.K.B., and D.J.H.), LifeArc (through the University of Edinburgh STOPCOVID funding award to K.D., D.A.D., and C.D.L.), UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) (Coronavirus Disease [COVID-19] Rapid Response Initiative; MR/V028790/1 to C.D.L., D.A.D., and J.A.H.), and Medical Research Scotland (CVG-1722-2020 to D.A.D., C.D.L., C.D.R., J.K.B., and D.J.H.). C.D.L. is funded by a Wellcome Trust Clinical Career Development Fellowship(206566/Z/17/Z). J.K.B. and C.D.R. are supported by the Medical Research Council (grant MC_PC_19059) as part of the International Severe AcuteRespiratory Infection Consortium Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium (ISARIC-4C). D.J.H., I.H.U., and M.E. are supported by the Industrial Centre for Artificial Intelligence Research in Digital Diagnostics. S.P. is supported by Kidney Research UK, and G.T. is supported by the Melville Trust for the Cure and Care of Cancer. Identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and sequencing work was supported by theU.S. Food and Drug Administration grant HHSF223201510104C (“Ebola Virus Disease: correlates of protection, determinants of outcome and clinicalmanagement”; amended to incorporate urgent COVID-19 studies) and contract 75F40120C00085 (“Characterization of severe coronavirus infection inhumans and model systems for medical countermeasure development and evaluation”; awarded to J.A.H.). J.A.H. is also funded by the Centre of Excellence in Infectious Diseases Research and the Alder Hey Charity. R.P.-R. is directly supported by the Medical Research Council Discovery Medicine North Doctoral Training Partnership. The group of J.A.H. is supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections at the University of Liverpool in partnership with Public Health England and in collaboration with Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and the University of Oxford.Rationale: In life-threatening Covid-19, corticosteroids reduce mortality, suggesting that immune responses have a causal role in death. Whether this deleterious inflammation is primarily a direct reaction to the presence of SARS-CoV-2 or an independent immunopathologic process is unknown. Objectives: To determine SARS-CoV-2 organotropism and organ-specific inflammatory responses, and the relationships between viral presence, inflammation, and organ injury. Methods: Tissue was acquired from eleven detailed post-mortem examinations. SARS-CoV-2 organotropism was mapped by multiplex PCR and sequencing, with cellular resolution achieved by in situ viral spike protein detection. Histological evidence of inflammation was quantified from 37 anatomical sites, and the pulmonary immune response characterized by multiplex immunofluorescence. Measurements and main results: Multiple aberrant immune responses in fatal Covid-19 were found, principally involving the lung and reticuloendothelial system, and these were not clearly topologically associated with the virus. Inflammation and organ dysfunction did not map to the tissue and cellular distribution of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and protein, both between and within tissues. An arteritis was identified in the lung, which was further characterised as a monocyte/myeloid-rich vasculitis, and occurred along with an influx of macrophage/monocyte-lineage cells into the pulmonary parenchyma. In addition, stereotyped abnormal reticulo-endothelial responses, including excessive reactive plasmacytosis and iron-laden macrophages, were present and dissociated from viral presence in lymphoid tissues. Conclusions: Tissue-specific immunopathology occurs in Covid-19, implicating a significant component of immune-mediated, virus-independent immunopathology as a primary mechanism in severe disease. Our data highlight novel immunopathological mechanisms, and validate ongoing and future efforts to therapeutically target aberrant macrophage and plasma cell responses as well as promoting pathogen tolerance in Covid-19.Publisher PDFPeer reviewe

Development of novel imaging probes to investigate FPR1 and FPR2 mediated pathways in inflammation

The body is exposed to harmful stimuli, such as bacterial or cellular debris, on a daily basis. Inflammatory cells travelling to the site of damage are responsible in removing the harmful stimulus, a process known as a proinflammatory response. Once the stimulus is neutralised, the inflammatory cells are no longer required and are removed in a controlled process, known as the resolution of inflammation. In inflammatory diseases, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, the pro-inflammatory response is excessive and prolonged without a resolution phase, resulting in tissue damage. The formyl peptide receptors (FPR) are a family of G-protein coupled receptors that play a role in not only the initiation, mainly through FPR1, but also resolution of inflammation, mainly through FPR2. The production of FPR1 and FPR2 specific optical probes can provide an insight about the inflammatory stages either in an in vitro or in vivo setting. As FPR2 probes have not been extensively investigated in the literature, a fluorescent peptide library of seven probes was produced using Trp-Lys-Tyr- Met-Val-Met (WKYMVM) and its variation Trp-Lys-Tyr-Met-Val-Met (WKYNleVNle) as the FPR2 agonist and the green fluorophores fluorescein, NBD and BODIPY. The FPR1 probe was constructed by coupling the FPR1 antagonist cinnamoylPhe-D-Leu-Phe -D-Leu-Phe-Lys (cFlFlFK) with the farred fluorophore Cy5. Fluorescent imaging and flow cytometry was carried out on primary cells and immortal cell lines expressing varying levels of FPR2 in 3 order to assess their fluorescent capabilities. Furthermore, competition binding assays with FPR ligands confirmed the binding of the fluorescent probes to their respective receptors. Prior data was used to select the best FPR2 probe candidate and along with the FPR1 probe, FPR levels were investigated in dexamethasone primed macrophages and platelet-activating factor (PAF) treated neutrophils. When the probes were tested as a single stain, dexamethasone increased FPR2 surface expression on human-derived macrophages whereas PAF increased FPR1 surface expression on granulocytes. However, when the experiments were repeated as a dual stain, the FPR2 probe showed to induce neutrophil shape change and increase FPR1 expression. However, fixing the cells prior to staining with probes inhibited the pro-inflammatory action of the FPR2 probe. The work carried out showed that FPR probes can be successfully produced without interfering with their structural integrity and specificity towards the receptor. Furthermore, they can be used to identify changes in FPR levels after exposure to various stimuli. The fluorescent probes could ultimately be used with optical endomicroscopic imaging systems in order to provide an insight of the role that FPR has in lung pathologies and how that may progress, but also how the levels may change upon treatment

The Origin of First-in-Class Drugs:Innovation Versus Clinical Benefit

First-in-class (FIC) designation became a hallmark of innovation, however, even at the marketing authorization stage, little is known about the clinical benefits these products deliver. We identified the provenance of the FIC drugs that entered the French market from 2008 to 2018 and matched these medicines to the clinical benefit grading by Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) and Prescrire. Analyses were performed using descriptive statistics to present our findings by drug origin and therapeutic area and to establish the degree of concordance between HAS and Prescrire. Of the 135 FIC drugs identified, 71.1% (n = 96) originated from the industry, 16.3% (n = 22) from academia, and 12.6% (n = 17) from joint partnerships. Three therapeutic areas accounted for most FIC medications: antineoplastic (25.9%, N = 35), anti-infective (14.1%, N = 19), and metabolic (11.1%, N = 15) agents. HAS and Prescrire agreed on 60.74% of clinical benefit gradings. According to HAS, only 5% of all FIC drugs had substantial added benefit, and only 3%, according to Prescrire. HAS and Prescrire graded 45.9% and 68.2%, respectively, of FIC drugs as no clinical benefit and 48.9% and 28.9%, respectively, as some clinical benefit. FIC-designated drugs are primarily of industry (&gt; 70%) rather than academic origin. We found that 55% of FIC medicines that entered the French market over the 10-year period deliver no additional clinical benefit. Whereas FIC medicines may represent important scientific advancements in drug development, in &gt; 50% of cases, the new mode of action does not translate into additional clinical benefits for patients.</p

COMBINATION OF AMOXICILLIN/CLAVULANATE AND PREDNISOLONE IN SEVERE ALCOHOLIC HEPATITIS: RESULTS OF THE ANTIBIOCOR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

International audienc

Effect of Prophylactic Antibiotics on Mortality in Severe Alcohol-Related Hepatitis

International audienceImportance The benefits of prophylactic antibiotics for hospitalized patients with severe alcohol-related hepatitis are unclear. Objective To determine the efficacy of amoxicillin-clavulanate, compared with placebo, on mortality in patients hospitalized with severe alcohol-related hepatitis and treated with prednisolone. Design, Setting, and Participants Multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial among patients with biopsy-proven severe alcohol-related hepatitis (Maddrey function score ≥32 and Model for End-stage Liver Disease [MELD] score ≥21) from June 13, 2015, to May 24, 2019, in 25 centers in France and Belgium. All patients were followed up for 180 days. Final follow-up occurred on November 19, 2019. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 allocation) to receive prednisolone combined with amoxicillin-clavulanate (n = 145) or prednisolone combined with placebo (n = 147). Main Outcome and Measures The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 60 days. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality at 90 and 180 days; incidence of infection, incidence of hepatorenal syndrome, and proportion of participants with a MELD score less than 17 at 60 days; and proportion of patients with a Lille score less than 0.45 at 7 days. Results Among 292 randomized patients (mean age, 52.8 [SD, 9.2] years; 80 [27.4%] women) 284 (97%) were analyzed. There was no significant difference in 60-day mortality between participants randomized to amoxicillin-clavulanate and those randomized to placebo (17.3% in the amoxicillin-clavulanate group and 21.3% in the placebo group [ P = .33]; between-group difference, −4.7% [95% CI, −14.0% to 4.7%]; hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.45-1.31]). Infection rates at 60 days were significantly lower in the amoxicillin-clavulanate group (29.7% vs 41.5%; mean difference, −11.8% [95% CI, −23.0% to −0.7%]; subhazard ratio, 0.62; [95% CI, 0.41-0.91]; P = .02). There were no significant differences in any of the remaining 3 secondary outcomes. The most common serious adverse events were related to liver failure (25 in the amoxicillin-clavulanate group and 20 in the placebo group), infections (23 in the amoxicillin-clavulanate group and 46 in the placebo group), and gastrointestinal disorders (15 in the amoxicillin-clavulanate group and 21 in the placebo group). Conclusion and Relevance In patients hospitalized with severe alcohol-related hepatitis, amoxicillin-clavulanate combined with prednisolone did not improve 2-month survival compared with prednisolone alone. These results do not support prophylactic antibiotics to improve survival in patients hospitalized with severe alcohol-related hepatitis. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0228192

COMBINATION OF AMOXICILLIN/CLAVULANATE AND PREDNISOLONE IN SEVERE ALCOHOLIC HEPATITIS: RESULTS OF THE ANTIBIOCOR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

International audienc