Study on psychoeducation enhancing results of adherence in patients with schizophrenia (SPERA-S): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Poor adherence to pharmacotherapy negatively affects the course and the outcome of schizophreniaspectrum psychoses, enhancing the risk of relapse. Falloon and coworkers developed a Psychoeducation Program aimed at improving communication and problem-solving abilities in patients and their families. This study set out to evaluate changes in adherence to pharmacotherapy in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum psychoses, by comparing one group exposed to the Falloon Psychoeducation Program (FPP) with another group exposed to family supportive therapy with generic information on the disorders. METHODS: 340 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and related disorders according to standardized criteria from 10 participating units distributed throughout the Italian National Health System (NHS), will be enrolled with 1:1 allocation by the method of blocks of randomized permutations. Patients will be reassessed at 6, 12 and 18 months after start of treatment (duration: 6 months).The primary objective is to evaluate changes in adherence to pharmacotherapy after psychoeducation. Adherence will be assessed at three-month intervals by measuring blood levels of the primary prescribed drug using high pressure liquid chromatography, and via the Medication Adherence Questionnaire and a modified version of the Adherence Interview. Secondary objectives are changes in the frequency of relapse and readmission, as the main indicator of the course of the disorder.Enrolled patients will be allocated to the FPP (yes/no) randomly, 1:1, in a procedure controlled by the coordinating unit; codes will be masked until the conclusion of the protocol (or the occurrence of a severe negative event). The raters will be blind to treatment allocation and will be tested for blinding after treatment completion. Intention-to-treat will be applied in considering the primary and secondary outcomes. Multiple imputations will be applied to integrate the missing data. The study started recruitment in February 2013; the total duration of the study is 27 months. DISCUSSION: If the psychoeducation program proves effective in improving adherence to pharmacotherapy and in reducing relapse and readmissions, its application could be proposed as a standard adjunctive psychosocial treatment within the Italian NHS

Negative feedback regulation of the ERK1/2 MAPK pathway

The extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling pathway regulates many cellular functions, including proliferation, differentiation, and transformation. To reliably convert external stimuli into specific cellular responses and to adapt to environmental circumstances, the pathway must be integrated into the overall signalling activity of the cell. Multiple mechanisms have evolved to perform this role. In this review, we will focus on negative feedback mechanisms and examine how they shape ERK1/2 MAPK signalling. We will first discuss the extensive number of negative feedback loops targeting the different components of the ERK1/2 MAPK cascade, specifically the direct posttranslational modification of pathway components by downstream protein kinases and the induction of de novo gene synthesis of specific pathway inhibitors. We will then evaluate how negative feedback modulates the spatiotemporal signalling dynamics of the ERK1/2 pathway regarding signalling amplitude and duration as well as subcellular localisation. Aberrant ERK1/2 activation results in deregulated proliferation and malignant transformation in model systems and is commonly observed in human tumours. Inhibition of the ERK1/2 pathway thus represents an attractive target for the treatment of malignant tumours with increased ERK1/2 activity. We will, therefore, discuss the effect of ERK1/2 MAPK feedback regulation on cancer treatment and how it contributes to reduced clinical efficacy of therapeutic agents and the development of drug resistance

Assessing the pathogenicity of MLH1 missence mutations in patients with suspected Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC): correlation with clinical, genetic and functional features

Assessing the pathogenicity of missense mutations of MLH1 and MSH2 is critical to counsel patients with suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Approximately 32% of all MLH1 mutations and 18% of MSH2 mutations are missense variants which often have an uncertain genetic significance. To assess the pathogenicity of four MLH1 missense mutations which were found in five patients with suspected HNPCC, P648S (CCC \ue2\u86\u92 TCC), L559R (CTG \ue2\u86\u92 CGG), K618A (AAG \ue2\u86\u92 GCG), Y646C (TAT \ue2\u86\u92 TGT), we studied their ability to disrupt MLH1 protein function and their relationship with all those clinical, genetic and pathological features which are typical of this syndrome. Our results indicated that the P648S and L559R mutations were probably pathogenic because they disrupted MLH1 protein interaction with its partner PMS2 in vitro and abolished MLH1 expression in HCT116 cells. In addition these variants were associated with features often found in HNPCC patients: in particular high microsatellite instability, occurrence of high grade tumours and, in one case, strong family history. The pathogenicity of the K618A and Y646C mutations was questionable as their correlation with features typical of HNPCC was low and the outcome of the functional analysis was ambiguous. These observations suggested that a clinically usable assessment of the pathogenicity of MLH missense variants can be achieved through the analysis of multiple mutation characteristics among which loss of protein function, occurrence of microsatellite instability and family history seemed to have a predominant role