5 research outputs found
Liver function abnormalities, clinical profile, and outcome in acute decompensated heart failure
AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) and the associated clinical profile and outcome(s) in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients. Alteration in LFTs is a recognized feature of ADHF, but prevalence and outcomes data from a broad contemporary cohort of ADHF are scarce and the mechanism(s) of ADHF-induced cholestasis is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of SURVIVE, a large clinical trial including ADHF patients treated with levosimendan or dobutamine. All LFTs were available in 1134 patients at baseline. Abnormal LFTs were seen in 46% of ADHF patients: isolated abnormal alkaline phosphatase (AP) was noted in 11%, isolated abnormal transaminases in 26%, and a combination of abnormal AP and transaminases in 9%. Abnormal AP was associated with marked signs of systemic congestion and elevated right-sided filling pressure. Abnormal AP had no relationship with 31-day mortality but was associated with worse 180-day mortality (23.5 vs. 34.9%, P = 0.001 vs. patients with normal AP). Abnormal transaminases were associated with clinical signs of hypoperfusion and with greater 31-day and 180-day mortality compared with normal transaminase profiles (17.6 vs. 8.4% and 31.6 vs. 22.4%, respectively; both P < 0.001). There was no additive value of abnormal AP plus abnormal transaminase on a long-term outcome. CONCLUSION: Abnormal LFTs were present in about a half of patients presenting with ADHF treated with inotropes. Abnormal AP and abnormal transaminases were associated with specific clinical, biological, and prognostic features, including a short-term overmortality with increased transaminases but not with biological signs of cholestasis, in ADHF patient
Levosimendan vs dobutamine for patients with acute decompensated heart failure: the SURVIVE Randomized Trial.
CONTEXT: Because acute decompensated heart failure causes substantial morbidity and mortality, there is a need for agents that at least improve hemodynamics and relieve symptoms without adversely affecting survival. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a short-term intravenous infusion of levosimendan or dobutamine on long-term survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The Survival of Patients With Acute Heart Failure in Need of Intravenous Inotropic Support (SURVIVE) study was a randomized, double-blind trial comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous levosimendan or dobutamine in 1327 patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure who required inotropic support. The trial was conducted at 75 centers in 9 countries and patients were randomized between March 2003 and December 2004. INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous levosimendan (n = 664) or intravenous dobutamine (n = 663). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All-cause mortality at 180 days. RESULTS: All-cause mortality at 180 days occurred in 173 (26%) patients in the levosimendan group and 185 (28%) patients in the dobutamine group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.13; P = .40). The levosimendan group had greater decreases in B-type natriuretic peptide level at 24 hours that persisted through 5 days compared with the dobutamine group (P<.001 for all time points). There were no statistical differences between treatment groups for the other secondary end points (all-cause mortality at 31 days, number of days alive and out of the hospital, patient global assessment, patient assessment of dyspnea at 24 hours, and cardiovascular mortality at 180 days). There was a higher incidence of cardiac failure in the dobutamine group. There were higher incidences of atrial fibrillation, hypokalemia, and headache in the levosimendan group. CONCLUSION: Despite an initial reduction in plasma B-type natriuretic peptide level in patients in the levosimendan group compared with patients in the dobutamine group, levosimendan did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality at 180 days or affect any secondary clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00348504
Liver function abnormalities, clinical profile, and outcome in acute decompensated heart failure
The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of abnormal liver
function tests (LFTs) and the associated clinical profile and outcome(s)
in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients. Alteration in LFTs
is a recognized feature of ADHF, but prevalence and outcomes data from a
broad contemporary cohort of ADHF are scarce and the mechanism(s) of
ADHF-induced cholestasis is unknown.
We conducted a post hoc analysis of SURVIVE, a large clinical trial
including ADHF patients treated with levosimendan or dobutamine. All
LFTs were available in 1134 patients at baseline. Abnormal LFTs were
seen in 46 of ADHF patients: isolated abnormal alkaline phosphatase (AP)
was noted in 11, isolated abnormal transaminases in 26, and a
combination of abnormal AP and transaminases in 9. Abnormal AP was
associated with marked signs of systemic congestion and elevated
right-sided filling pressure. Abnormal AP had no relationship with
31-day mortality but was associated with worse 180-day mortality (23.5
vs. 34.9, P 0.001 vs. patients with normal AP). Abnormal transaminases
were associated with clinical signs of hypoperfusion and with greater
31-day and 180-day mortality compared with normal transaminase profiles
(17.6 vs. 8.4 and 31.6 vs. 22.4, respectively; both P 0.001). There was
no additive value of abnormal AP plus abnormal transaminase on a
long-term outcome.
Abnormal LFTs were present in about a half of patients presenting with
ADHF treated with inotropes. Abnormal AP and abnormal transaminases were
associated with specific clinical, biological, and prognostic features,
including a short-term overmortality with increased transaminases but
not with biological signs of cholestasis, in ADHF patients
Serum uric acid and outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure through the whole spectrum of ejection fraction phenotypes: Analysis of the ESC-EORP Heart Failure Long-Term (HF LT) Registry
Background: Retrospective analyses of clinical trials indicate that
elevated serum uric acid (sUA) predicts poor outcome in heart failure
(HF). Uric acid can contribute to inflammation and microvascular
dysfunction, which may differently affect different left ventricular
ejection fraction (LVEF) phenotypes. However, role of sUA across LVEF
phenotypes is unknown. Objectives: We investigated sUA association with
outcome in a prospective cohort of HF patients stratified according to
LVEF. Methods: Through the Heart Failure Long-Term Registry of the
European Society of Cardiology (ESC-EORP-HFLT), 4,438 outpatients were
identified and classified into: reduced (<40% HFrEF), mid-range
(40-49% HFmrEF), and preserved (>= 50% HFpEF) LVEF. Endpoints were the
composite of cardiovascular death/HF hospitalization, and individual
components. Results: Median sUA was 6.72 (IQ:5.48-8.20) mg/dl in HFrEF,
6.41 (5.02-7.77) in HFmrEF, and 6.30 (5.20-7.70) in HFpEF. At a median
372-day follow-up, the composite endpoint occurred in 648 (13.1%)
patients, with 176 (3.6%) deaths and 538 (10.9%) HF hospitalizations.
Compared with lowest sUA quartile (Q), Q-III and Q-IV were significantly
associated with the composite endpoint (adjusted HR 1.68: 95% CI
1.11-2.54; 2.46: 95% CI 1.66-3.64, respectively). By univariable
analyses, HFrEF and HFmrEF patients in Q-III and Q-IV, and HFpEF
patients in Q-IV, showed increased risk for the composite endpoint
(P<0.05 for all); after model-adjustment, significant association of sUA
with outcome persisted among HFrEF in Q-IV, and HFpEF in Q-III-IV.
Conclusions: In a large, contemporary-treated cohort of HF outpatients,
sUA is an independent prognosticator of adverse outcome, which can be
appreciated in HErEF and HFpEF patients