5 research outputs found

    Conservation Biogeography of the Sahara‐Sahel: additional protected areas are needed to secure unique biodiversity

    Get PDF
    Aim Identification of priority conservation areas and evaluation of coverage of the current protected areas are urgently needed to halt the biodiversity loss. Identifying regions combining similar environmental traits (climate regions) and species assemblages (biogroups) is needed for conserving the biodiversity patterns and processes. We identify climate regions and biogroups and map species diversity across the Sahara-Sahel, a large geographical area that exhibits wide environmental heterogeneity and multiple species groups with distinct biogeographical affinities, and evaluate the coverage level of current network of protected areas for biodiversity conservation. Location Sahara-Sahel, Africa. Methods We use spatially explicit climate data with the principal component analysis and model-based clustering techniques to identify climate regions. We use distributions of 1147 terrestrial vertebrates (and of 125 Sahara-Sahel endemics) and apply distance clustering methods to identify biogroups for both species groups. We apply reserve selection algorithms targeting 17% of species distribution, climate regions and biogroups to identify priority areas and gap analysis to assess their representation within the current protected areas. Results Seven climate regions were identified, mostly arranged as latitudinal belts. Concentrations of high species richness were found in the Sahel, but the central Sahara gathers most endemic and threatened species. Ten biogroups (five for endemics) were identified. A wide range of biogroups tend to overlap in specific climate regions. Identified priority areas are inadequately represented in protected areas, and six new top conservation areas are needed to achieve conservation targets. Main conclusions Biodiversity distribution in Sahara-Sahel is spatially structured and apparently related to environmental variation. Although the majority of priority conservation areas are located outside the areas of intense human activities, many cross multiple political borders and require internationally coordinated efforts for implementation and management. Optimized biodiversity conservation solutions at regional scale are needed. Our work contradicts the general idea that deserts are uniform areas and provide options for the conservation of endangered species.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    Infection induced SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and heterogeneity of antibody responses in a general population cohort study in Catalonia Spain

    Get PDF
    Sparse data exist on the complex natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 at the population level. We applied a well-validated multiplex serology test in 5000 participants of a general population study in Catalonia in blood samples collected from end June to mid November 2020. Based on responses to fifteen isotype-antigen combinations, we detected a seroprevalence of 18.1% in adults (n = 4740), and modeled extrapolation to the general population of Catalonia indicated a 15.3% seroprevalence. Antibodies persisted up to 9 months after infection. Immune profiling of infected individuals revealed that with increasing severity of infection (asymptomatic, 1-3 symptoms, ≥ 4 symptoms, admitted to hospital/ICU), seroresponses were more robust and rich with a shift towards IgG over IgA and anti-spike over anti-nucleocapsid responses. Among seropositive participants, lower antibody levels were observed for those ≥ 60 years vs < 60 years old and smokers vs non-smokers. Overweight/obese participants vs normal weight had higher antibody levels. Adolescents (13-15 years old) (n = 260) showed a seroprevalence of 11.5%, were less likely to be tested seropositive compared to their parents and had dominant anti-spike rather than anti-nucleocapsid IgG responses. Our study provides an unbiased estimate of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in Catalonia and new evidence on the durability and heterogeneity of post-infection immunity

    SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination, and antibody response trajectories in adults: a cohort study in Catalonia

    No full text
    Abstract Background Heterogeneity of the population in relation to infection, COVID-19 vaccination, and host characteristics is likely reflected in the underlying SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses. Methods We measured IgM, IgA, and IgG levels against SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid antigens in 1076 adults of a cohort study in Catalonia between June and November 2020 and a second time between May and July 2021. Questionnaire data and electronic health records on vaccination and COVID-19 testing were available in both periods. Data on several lifestyle, health-related, and sociodemographic characteristics were also available. Results Antibody seroreversion occurred in 35.8% of the 64 participants non-vaccinated and infected almost a year ago and was related to asymptomatic infection, age above 60 years, and smoking. Moreover, the analysis on kinetics revealed that among all responses, IgG RBD, IgA RBD, and IgG S2 decreased less within 1 year after infection. Among vaccinated, 2.1% did not present antibodies at the time of testing and approximately 1% had breakthrough infections post-vaccination. In the post-vaccination era, IgM responses and those against nucleoprotein were much less prevalent. In previously infected individuals, vaccination boosted the immune response and there was a slight but statistically significant increase in responses after a 2nd compared to the 1st dose. Infected vaccinated participants had superior antibody levels across time compared to naïve-vaccinated people. mRNA vaccines and, particularly the Spikevax, induced higher antibodies after 1st and 2nd doses compared to Vaxzevria or Janssen COVID-19 vaccines. In multivariable regression analyses, antibody responses after vaccination were predicted by the type of vaccine, infection age, sex, smoking, and mental and cardiovascular diseases. Conclusions Our data support that infected people would benefit from vaccination. Results also indicate that hybrid immunity results in superior antibody responses and infection-naïve people would need a booster dose earlier than previously infected people. Mental diseases are associated with less efficient responses to vaccination

    Additional file 1 of SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination, and antibody response trajectories in adults: a cohort study in Catalonia

    No full text
    Additional file 1: Table S1. Characteristics of participants with breakthrough infections, post-vaccination. Table S2. Allocation of vaccinated and non-vaccinated participants with evidence of infection according to the criterion of infection fulfilled. Table S3. Fold change (FC) (95% CI) in antibody levels within one year after infection estimated using two repeated samples among decayers. Estimates are based on linear mixed-effects models. Table S4. Spearman correlations for RBD antigen. All participants, n=1,076. Darker red=stronger association. Table S5. Cross tabulation between serostatus to RBD of Wuhan variant with the RBD of Alpha, Beta Gamma and Delta variants. Table S6. Characteristics of non-responders (seronagetive or with an undetermined status) to vaccination. Table S7. Association (fold change FC and 95% CI and p-values) between each determinant with log10 antibody leves in vaccinated people after adjusting each model for time since last vaccination and number of doses. Participants with any vaccination excluding Janssen (n=923). Table S8. P-values for comparisons related to Figs. 3 and 5 and Figure S6. Figure S1. Dates and density of positive viral detection tests, sampling in 2020 (1st serological assessment) and 2021 (2nd serological assessment) and receipt of 1st vaccine dose in the study population (n=1,076). Figure S2. Venn diagram illustrating overlap between sustainer groups of IgA or IgG antibodies against nucleoprotein and spike antigens, among all infected unvaccinated participants (n=64). Figure S3. Differences in IgG antibody responses against RBD between Wuhan, Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Delta variant among vaccinated people. All differences were statistically significant apart from Delta vs Wuhan (p=0.861) and Alpha vs Wuhan (p=0.051). Figure S4. Generalized additive models for associations of days since vaccination with antibody responses to the six isotype-antigen combinations in infected (red) and naïve (blue) participants after first or second dose in people vaccinated by Vaxzevria (a), Comirnaty (b) or Spikevax (c). Fitted lines after adjustment for participant’s age. Plus symbols (+) represent measured responses for a specific participant. Figure S5. Differences in antibody responses by infection and/or vaccination and number of doses in people vaccinated with Comirnaty (a), Spikevarx (b), Vaxzevria (c) of Janssen COVID-19 vaccine (d). Figure S6. Differences in IgM responses by infection and/or vaccination and number of doses. Table S8 presents corresponding p-values
    corecore