Cutting errors in total knee replacement: Assessment by computer assisted surgery

The observed errors in the position of the implanted prosthesis can be due to a number of potential causes. One of these is the potential error during execution of the bone cuts. However, there is only minimal information on this in the current literature. The amount of cutting errors in 40 consecutive total knee replacements was reported. All the operations were done by the same surgeon. The amount of cutting error was measured by the use of computer navigation system. It was hypothesized that there was no difference in the amount of error between bone cut through the cutting slot (slotted cutting) and bone cut done on the surface of the cutting guide (open cutting). It was found that the average absolute cutting error was 1° in the coronal plane and 1.4° in the sagittal plane. Significantly more outlier (more than 3°) was observed in the errors in the sagittal plane (P = 0.014, chi square test). Open cutting resulted in less error in the sagittal plane of the tibial cut when compared with slotted cutting (P = 0.031, Mann-Whitney U Test). This was attributed by the use of a thicker saw blade with higher stiffness in the open cutting method. © 2008 Springer-Verlag.postprin

Relationship between cutting errors and learning curve in computer-assisted total knee replacement

Computer-assisted total knee replacement (TKR) has been shown to improve radiographic alignment. Continuous feedback from the navigation system allows accurate adjustment of the bone cuts, thus reducing errors. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of experience both with computer navigation and knee replacement surgery on the frequency of errors in intraoperative bone cuts and implant alignment. Three homogeneous patient groups undergoing computer assisted TKR were included in the study. Each group was treated by one of three surgeons with varying experience in computer-aided and knee replacement surgery. Surgeon A had extensive experience in knee replacement and computer-assisted surgery. Surgeon B was an experienced knee replacement surgeon. A general orthopaedic surgeon with limited knee replacement surgery experience performed all surgeries in group C. The cutting errors and the number of re-cuts were determined intraoperatively. The complications and mean surgical time were collected for each group. The postoperative frontal femoral component angle, frontal tibial component angle, hip–knee–ankle angle and component slopes were evaluated. The results showed that the number of cutting errors were lowest for TKR performed by the surgeon with experience in navigation. This difference was statistically significant when compared to the general orthopaedic surgeon. A statistically significant superior result was achieved in final mechanical axis alignment for the surgeon experienced in computer-guided surgery compared to the other two groups (179.3° compared to 178.9° and 178.1°). However, the total number of outliers was similar, with no statistically significant differences among the three surgeons. Experience with navigation significantly reduced the surgical time