16 research outputs found

    Parents' Psychological and Decision-Making Outcomes following Prenatal Diagnosis with Complex Congenital Heart Defect: An Exploratory Study

    Get PDF
    UNLABELLED: Background. Parents with a fetus diagnosed with a complex congenital heart defect (CHD) are at high risk of negative psychological outcomes. Purpose. To explore whether parents' psychological and decision-making outcomes differed based on their treatment decision and fetus/neonate survival status. Methods. We prospectively enrolled parents with a fetus diagnosed with a complex, life-threatening CHD from September 2018 to December 2020. We tested whether parents' psychological and decision-making outcomes 3 months posttreatment differed by treatment choice and survival status. Results. Our sample included 23 parents (average Age[years]: 27 ± 4, range = 21-37). Most were women (n = 18), non-Hispanic White (n = 20), and married (n = 21). Most parents chose surgery (n = 16), with 11 children surviving to the time of the survey; remaining parents (n = 7) chose comfort-directed care. Parents who chose comfort-directed care reported higher distress (x¯ = 1.51, s = 0.75 v. x¯ = 0.74, s = 0.55; Mdifference = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-1.48) and perinatal grief (x¯ = 91.86, s = 22.96 v. x¯ = 63.38, s = 20.15; Mdifference = 27.18, 95% CI, 6.20-48.16) than parents who chose surgery, regardless of survival status. Parents who chose comfort-directed care reported higher depression (x¯ = 1.64, s = 0.95 v. x¯ = 0.65, s = 0.49; Mdifference = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.10-1.88) than parents whose child survived following surgery. Parents choosing comfort-directed care reported higher regret (x¯ = 26.43, s = 8.02 v. x¯ = 5.00, s = 7.07; Mdifference = 21.43, 95% CI, 11.59-31.27) and decisional conflict (x¯ = 20.98, s = 10.00 v. x¯ = 3.44, s = 4.74; Mdifference = 17.54, 95% CI; 7.75-27.34) than parents whose child had not survived following surgery. Parents whose child survived following surgery reported lower grief (Mdifference = -19.71; 95% CI, -39.41 to -0.01) than parents whose child had not. Conclusions. The results highlight the potential for interventions and care tailored to parents' treatment decisions and outcomes to support parental coping and well-being. HIGHLIGHTS: Question: Do the psychological and decision-making outcomes of parents differ based on their treatment decision and survival outcome following prenatal diagnosis with complex CHD?Findings: In this exploratory study, parents who decided to pursue comfort-directed care after a prenatal diagnosis reported higher levels of psychological distress and grief as well as higher decisional conflict and regret than parents who decided to pursue surgery.Meaning: The findings from this exploratory study highlight potential differences in parents' psychological and decision-making outcomes following a diagnosis of complex CHD for their fetus, which appear to relate to the treatment approach and the treatment outcome and may require tailoring of psychological and decision support

    Denitrificatie in het veld door gewasresten met/zonder N-immobiliserend materiaal

    No full text
    Perinatal cardiovascular care has evolved considerably to become its own multidisciplinary field of care. Despite advancements, there remain significant gaps in providing optimal care for the fetus, child, mother, and family. Continued advancement in detection and diagnosis, perinatal care and delivery planning, and prediction and improvement of morbidity and mortality for fetuses affected by cardiac conditions such as heart defects or functional or rhythm disturbances requires collaboration between the multiple types of specialists and providers. The Fetal Heart Society was created to formalize and support collaboration between individuals, stakeholders, and institutions. This article summarizes the challenges faced to create the infrastructure for advancement of the field and the measures the FHS is undertaking to overcome the barriers to support progress in the field of perinatal cardiac care

    22q11.2 Deletion Status and Perioperative Outcomes for Tetralogy of Fallot with Pulmonary Atresia and Multiple Aortopulmonary Collateral Vessels

    No full text
    Deletion of 22q11.2 (del22q11) is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). We sought to investigate its contribution to perioperative outcome in patients with a severe form of TOF characterized by pulmonary atresia (PA) or severe pulmonary stenosis (PS) and major aortopulmonary collateral arteries (MAPCAS). We conducted a retrospective review of patients with TOF/MAPCAS who underwent staged surgical reconstruction between 1995 and 2006. Groups were compared according to 22q11.2 deletion status using t-tests or the Wilcoxon Rank sum test. We included 26 subjects, 24 of whom survived the initial operation. Of those, 21 subjects had known deletion status and constitute the group for this analysis [15 with no deletion present (ND) and 6 del22q11 subjects]. There was no difference with respect to occurrence of palliative procedure prior to initial operation, or to timing of closure of the ventricular septal defect (VSD). Other than higher prevalence of prematurity (50%) in the del22q11 group versus no prematurity in the ND, the groups were comparable in terms of pre-operative characteristics. The intra- and post-operative course outcomes (length of cardiopulmonary bypass, use of vasopressors, duration of intensive care and length of hospital stay, tube-feeding) were also comparable. Although the del22q11 had longer mechanical ventilation than the ND, this difference was not significant [68 h (range 4-251) vs. 45 h (range 3-1005), p = 0.81]. In this detailed comparison of a small patient cohort, 22q11.2 deletion syndrome was not associated with adverse perioperative outcomes in patients with TOF, PA, and MAPCAS when compared to those without 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. These results are relevant to prenatal and neonatal pre-operative counseling and planning

    Parents’ Psychological and Decision-Making Outcomes following Prenatal Diagnosis with Complex Congenital Heart Defect: An Exploratory Study

    No full text
    Background. Parents with a fetus diagnosed with a complex congenital heart defect (CHD) are at high risk of negative psychological outcomes. Purpose. To explore whether parents’ psychological and decision-making outcomes differed based on their treatment decision and fetus/neonate survival status. Methods. We prospectively enrolled parents with a fetus diagnosed with a complex, life-threatening CHD from September 2018 to December 2020. We tested whether parents’ psychological and decision-making outcomes 3 months posttreatment differed by treatment choice and survival status. Results. Our sample included 23 parents (average Age [years] : 27 ± 4, range = 21–37). Most were women ( n  = 18), non-Hispanic White ( n  = 20), and married ( n  = 21). Most parents chose surgery ( n  = 16), with 11 children surviving to the time of the survey; remaining parents ( n  = 7) chose comfort-directed care. Parents who chose comfort-directed care reported higher distress ( x ¯  = 1.51, s  = 0.75 v. x ¯  = 0.74, s  = 0.55; Mdifference = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05–1.48) and perinatal grief ( x ¯  = 91.86, s  = 22.96 v. x ¯  = 63.38, s  = 20.15; Mdifference = 27.18, 95% CI, 6.20–48.16) than parents who chose surgery, regardless of survival status. Parents who chose comfort-directed care reported higher depression ( x ¯  = 1.64, s  = 0.95 v. x ¯  = 0.65, s  = 0.49; Mdifference = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.10–1.88) than parents whose child survived following surgery. Parents choosing comfort-directed care reported higher regret ( x ¯  = 26.43, s  = 8.02 v. x ¯  = 5.00, s  = 7.07; Mdifference = 21.43, 95% CI, 11.59–31.27) and decisional conflict ( x ¯  = 20.98, s  = 10.00 v. x ¯  = 3.44, s  = 4.74; Mdifference = 17.54, 95% CI; 7.75–27.34) than parents whose child had not survived following surgery. Parents whose child survived following surgery reported lower grief (Mdifference = −19.71; 95% CI, −39.41 to −0.01) than parents whose child had not. Conclusions. The results highlight the potential for interventions and care tailored to parents’ treatment decisions and outcomes to support parental coping and well-being. Highlights Question: Do the psychological and decision-making outcomes of parents differ based on their treatment decision and survival outcome following prenatal diagnosis with complex CHD? Findings: In this exploratory study, parents who decided to pursue comfort-directed care after a prenatal diagnosis reported higher levels of psychological distress and grief as well as higher decisional conflict and regret than parents who decided to pursue surgery. Meaning: The findings from this exploratory study highlight potential differences in parents’ psychological and decision-making outcomes following a diagnosis of complex CHD for their fetus, which appear to relate to the treatment approach and the treatment outcome and may require tailoring of psychological and decision support

    Parents' quality of life and health after treatment decision for a fetus with severe congenital heart defect

    No full text
    Purpose: This exploratory study examines differences in parents' quality of life by treatment decision and the child's survival outcome in the context of life-threatening congenital heart disease (CHD). Design and methods: Parents of a fetus or neonate diagnosed with severe CHD enrolled in the observational control group of a clinical trial (NCT04437069) and completed quality of life (i.e., contact with clinicians, social support, partner relationship, state of mind), mental and physical health survey measures. Comparisons were made between parents who chose comfort-directed care or surgery and between those whose child did and did not survive. Results: Parents who chose surgery and their child did not survive reported the most contact with their clinicians. Parents who chose comfort-directed care reported lower social support than parents who chose surgery and their child did not survive as well as poorer state of mind compared to parents who chose surgery. Conclusions: Some aspects of parents' quality of life differed based on their treatment decision. Parents who choose comfort-directed care are vulnerable to some negative outcomes. Practice implications: Decision support tools and bereavement resources to assist parents with making and coping with a complex treatment decision is important for clinical care

    Parents\u27 decision-making for their foetus or neonate with a severe congenital heart defect

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Parents who receive a diagnosis of a severe, life-threatening CHD for their foetus or neonate face a complex and stressful decision between termination, palliative care, or surgery. Understanding how parents make this initial treatment decision is critical for developing interventions to improve counselling for these families. METHODS: We conducted focus groups in four academic medical centres across the United States of America with a purposive sample of parents who chose termination, palliative care, or surgery for their foetus or neonate diagnosed with severe CHD. RESULTS: Ten focus groups were conducted with 56 parents ( = 34 years; 80% female; 89% White). Results were constructed around three domains: decision-making approaches; values and beliefs; and decision-making challenges. Parents discussed varying approaches to making the decision, ranging from relying on their gut feeling to desiring statistics and probabilities. Religious and spiritual beliefs often guided the decision to not terminate the pregnancy. Quality of life was an important consideration, including how each option would impact the child (e.g., pain or discomfort, cognitive and physical abilities) and their family (e.g., care for other children, marriage, and career). Parents reported inconsistent communication of options by clinicians and challenges related to time constraints for making a decision and difficulty in processing information when distressed. CONCLUSION: This study offers important insights that can be used to design interventions to improve decision support and family-centred care in clinical practice
    corecore