665 research outputs found

    M(Bc)M(Bc)M(B^*_c)-M(B_c) Splitting from Nonrelativistic Renormalization Group

    Get PDF
    We compute the hyperfine splitting in a heavy quarkonium composed of different flavors in next-to-leading logarithmic approximation using the nonrelativistic renormalization group. We predict the mass difference of the vector and pseudoscalar charm-bottom mesons to be M(Bc)M(Bc)=46±15(th)11+13(δαs)M(B^*_c)-M(B_c)=46 \pm 15 {(\rm th)} {}^{+13}_{-11} (\delta\alpha_s) MeV.Comment: Eq.(22) and Appendix corrected, numerical results slightly changed. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:hep-ph/031208

    Spin Dependence of Heavy Quarkonium Production and Annihilation Rates: Complete Next-to-Next-to-Leading Logarithmic result

    Full text link
    The ratio of the photon mediated production or annihilation rates of spin triplet and spin singlet heavy quarkonium states is computed to the next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy within the nonrelativistic renormalization group approach. The result is presented in analytical form and applied to the phenomenology of ttˉt\bar{t}, bbˉb\bar{b} and ccˉc\bar{c} systems. The use of the nonrelativistic renormalization group considerably improves the behaviour of the perturbative expansion and is crucial for accurate theoretical analysis. For bottomonium decays we predict Γ(ηb(1S)γγ)=0.659±0.089(th.)0.018+0.019(δαs)±0.015(exp.)keV\Gamma(\eta_b(1S) \to \gamma\gamma)=0.659\pm 0.089 ({\rm th.}) {}^{+0.019}_{-0.018} (\delta \alpha_{\rm s})\pm 0.015 ({\rm exp.}) {\rm keV}. Our results question the accuracy of the existing extractions of the strong coupling constant from the bottomonium annihilation. As a by-product we obtain novel corrections to the ratio of the ortho- and parapositronium decay rates: the corrections of order α4ln2α\alpha^4\ln^2\alpha and α5ln3α\alpha^5\ln^3\alpha.Comment: Appendices A.4, A.5 and B correcte

    Ultrasoft contribution to quarkonium production and annihilation

    Get PDF
    We compute the third-order correction to electromagnetic S-wave quarkonium production and annihilation rates due to the emission and absorption of an ultrasoft gluon. Our result completes the analysis of the non-relativistic quarkonium bound-state dynamics in the next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order. The impact of the ultrasoft correction on the Upsilon(1S) leptonic width and the top quark-antiquark threshold production cross section is estimated.Comment: 10 page

    Soft, collinear and non-relativistic modes in radiative decays of very heavy quarkonium

    Get PDF
    We analyze the end-point region of the photon spectrum in semi-inclusive radiative decays of very heavy quarkonium (m alpha_s^2 >> Lambda_QCD). We discuss the interplay of the scales arising in the Soft-Collinear Effective Theory, m, m(1-z)^{1/2} and m(1-z) for z close to 1, with the scales of heavy quarkonium systems in the weak coupling regime, m, m alpha_s and m alpha_s^2. For 1-z \sim alpha_s^2 only collinear and (ultra)soft modes are seen to be relevant, but the recently discovered soft-collinear modes show up for 1-z << alpha_s^2. The S- and P-wave octet shape functions are calculated. When they are included in the analysis of the photon spectrum of the Upsilon (1S) system, the agreement with data in the end-point region becomes excellent. The NRQCD matrix elements and are also obtained.Comment: Revtex, 11 pages, 6 figures. Minor improvements and references added. Journal versio

    Top quark threshold production in γγ\gamma\gamma collision in the next-to-leading order

    Full text link
    The total cross section of the top quark-antiquark pair production near threshold in γγ\gamma\gamma collision is computed analytically up to the next-to-leading order in perturbative and nonrelativistic expansion for general photon helicity. The approximation includes the first order corrections in the strong coupling constant and the heavy quark velocity to the nonrelativistic Coulomb approximation.Comment: 27 pages Latex, misprints correcte

    Quarkonium spectroscopy and perturbative QCD: massive quark-loop effects

    Get PDF
    We study the spectra of the bottomonium and B_c states within perturbative QCD up to order alpha_s^4. The O(Lambda_QCD) renormalon cancellation between the static potential and the pole mass is performed in the epsilon-expansion scheme. We extend our previous analysis by including the (dominant) effects of non-zero charm-quark mass in loops up to the next-to-leading non-vanishing order epsilon^3. We fix the b-quark MSbar mass mˉbmbMSˉ(mbMSˉ)\bar{m}_b \equiv m_b^{\bar{\rm MS}}(m_b^{\bar{\rm MS}}) on Upsilon(1S) and compute the higher levels. The effect of the charm mass decreases mˉb\bar{m}_b by about 11 MeV and increases the n=2 and n=3 levels by about 70--100 MeV and 240--280 MeV, respectively. We provide an extensive quantitative analysis. The size of non-perturbative and higher order contributions is discussed by comparing the obtained predictions with the experimental data. An agreement of the perturbative predictions and the experimental data depends crucially on the precise value (inside the present error) of alpha_s(M_Z). We obtain mbMSˉ(mbMSˉ)=4190±20±25±3 MeVm_b^{\bar{\rm MS}}(m_b^{\bar{\rm MS}}) = 4190 \pm 20 \pm 25 \pm 3 ~ {\rm MeV}.Comment: 33 pages, 21 figures; v2: Abstract modified; Table7 (summary of errors) added; Version to appear in Phys.Rev.

    NRQCD Analysis of Bottomonium Production at the Tevatron

    Get PDF
    Recent data from the CDF collaboration on the production of spin-triplet bottomonium states at the Tevatron p \bar p collider are analyzed within the NRQCD factorization formalism. The color-singlet matrix elements are determined from electromagnetic decays and from potential models. The color-octet matrix elements are determined by fitting the CDF data on the cross sections for Upsilon(1S), Upsilon(2S), and Upsilon(3S) at large p_T and the fractions of Upsilon(1S) coming from chi_b(1P) and chi_b(2P). We use the resulting matrix elements to predict the cross sections at the Tevatron for the spin-singlet states eta_b(nS) and h_b(nP). We argue that eta_b(1S) should be observable in Run II through the decay eta_b -> J/psi + J/psi.Comment: 20 pages, 3 figure

    Calculations of binding energies and masses of heavy quarkonia using renormalon cancellation

    Full text link
    We use various methods of Borel integration to calculate the binding ground energies and masses of b-bbar and t-tbar quarkonia. The methods take into account the leading infrared renormalon structure of the hard+soft part of the binding energies E(s), and of the corresponding quark pole masses m_q, where the contributions of these singularities in M(s) = 2 m_q + E(s) cancel. Beforehand, we carry out the separation of the binding energy into its hard+soft and ultrasoft parts. The resummation formalisms are applied to expansions of m_q and E(s) in terms of quantities which do not involve renormalon ambiguity, such as MSbar quark mass, and alpha_s. The renormalization scales are different in calculations of m_q, E(s) and E(us). The MSbar mass of b quark is extracted, and the binding energies of t-tbar and the peak (resonance) energies for (t+tbar) production are obtained.Comment: 23 pages, 8 double figures, revtex4; the version to appear in Phys.Rev.D; extended discussion between Eqs.(25) and (26); the paragraph between Eqs.(32) and (33) is new and explains the numerical dependence of the residue parameter on the factorization scale; several new references were added; acknowledgments were modified; the numerical results are unchange

    Heavy quark mass determination from the quarkonium ground state energy: a pole mass approach

    Full text link
    The heavy quark pole mass in perturbation theory suffers from a renormalon caused, inherent uncertainty of O(ΛQCD)O(\Lambda_{\rm QCD}). This fundamental difficulty of determining the pole mass to an accuracy better than the inherent uncertainty can be overcome by direct resummation of the first infrared renormalon. We show how a properly defined pole mass as well as the MSˉ\bar {\rm MS} mass for the top and bottom quarks can be determined accurately from the O(mαs5)O(m\alpha_s^5) quarkonium ground state energy.Comment: 16 pages; published versio
    corecore