Evaluation of pain and catheter-related bladder discomfort relative to balloon volumes of indwelling urinary catheters: A prospective study

Purpose: To evaluate patients' tolerance to indwelling urinary catheters (IUCs) before and after reducing their balloon volumes. IUCs are a source of discomfort or pain. Materials and Methods: All consecutive patients hospitalized in our department with IUCs were included during the study period with some exclusion. Each patient was his/her own control before and two hours after reduction of the balloon volume (RBV) by half using two types of assessments, a visual analog scale for pain and a catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) symptom questionnaire. Results: Forty-nine patients were included in our study that completed the assessments. The mean scores for pain before and after RBVs were 2.80 and 2.02, respectively. The difference was significant (p<0.05). The mean grades of the CRBD before and after RBVs were 1.02 and 0.75, respectively. The difference was significant (p<0.05). Conclusions: A 50% RBV has shown a significant amelioration in tolerating the catheter

The role of CT-scan assessment of muscle mass in predicting postoperative surgical complications after renal transplantation

International audienc

Socio-economic and psychological impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on private practice and public hospital radiologists

International audiencePurpose: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an urgent reorganisation of the healthcare system to prevent hospitals from overflowing and the virus from spreading. Our objective was to evaluate the socioeconomic and psychological impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on radiologists.Material and methods: French radiologists were invited to answer an online survey during the pandemic through mailing lists. The questionnaire was accessible for nine days. It covered socio-demographic information, exposure to COVID-19 at work and impact on work organisation, and included the Insomnia Severity Index and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Outcomes were moderate to severe insomnia, definite symptoms of depression or anxiety. Risk and protective factors were identified through multivariate binary logistic regression.Results: 1515 radiologists answered the survey. Overall, 674 (44.5 %) worked in a highCOVID-19 density area, 671 (44.3 %) were women, and 809 (53.4 %) worked in private practice. Among responders, 186 (12.3 %) expressed insomnia, 222 (14.6 %) anxiety, and 189 (12.5 %) depression symptoms. Lack of protective equipment, increased teleradiology activity and negative impact on education were risk factors for insomnia (respectively OR [95 %CI]:1.7[1.1-2.7], 1.5[1.1-2.2], and 2.5[1.8-3.6]). Female gender, respiratory history, working in COVID-19 high density area, increase of COVID-19 related activity, and impacted education were risk factors for anxiety (OR[95 %CI]:1.7[1.2-2.3], 2[1.1-3.4], 1.5[1.1-2], 1.2[1-1.4], and 2.1[1.5-3]). Conversely, working in a public hospital was a protective factor against insomnia, anxiety, and depression (OR[95 %CI]:0.4[0.2-0.7], 0.6[0.4-0.9], and 0.5[0.3-0.8]).Conclusions: During COVID-19 pandemic, many radiologists expressed depression, anxiety and insomnia symptoms. Working in a public hospital was a protective factor against every psychological symptom. Socio-economic impact was also major especially in private practice

Ejaculations and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: An Impossible Compromise? A Comprehensive Review

International audienceBackground: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is commonly responsible for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men aged 50 or over. Sexual dysfunctions, such as ejaculatory disorders (EjD), go along with LUTS but are frequently overlooked in the initial evaluation. This review aimed to detail BPH-related EjD, as well as their modifications by medical, surgical, and interventional treatments. Methods: We conducted a narrative review looking for publications between 1990 and 2020, regarding physiopathology, epidemiology, evaluation, and therapeutic management (medical, surgical, and interventional) of BPH-related EjD. Results: Sixty-five articles were included in our final analysis. Forty-six percent of men presenting with LUTS reported EjD. If the prevalence increases with age and LUTS severity, the functional impairment is not correlated with age. Several self-questionnaires evaluated the sexual function, but only four approaches are specific to EjD. Medical therapies were exposed to anejaculation, rather than retrograde ejaculation (RE) (4–30% (alpha-blockers), 4–18% (5-alpha-reductase inhibitors)). Regarding surgical therapies, trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and incision of the prostate (TUIP) are associated with 50–70% and 21–35% of RE. The RE rate is important after open simple prostatectomy but can be reduced with robotic approaches and urethral sparing techniques (19%). Anatomic endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) with or without a laser source is associated with an 11–36% RE rate, according to supramontanal preservation. Recent surgical techniques (Rezum©, Aquablation©, or Urolift©) were developed to preserve antegrade ejaculation with promising short-term results. Regardless of the surgical approach, anatomic studies suggest that the preservation of peri-montanal tissue (7.5 mm laterally; 10 mm proximally) is primordial to avoid post-operative RE. Finally, prostate artery embolization (PAE) limits the RE rate but exposes it to a 12 months 10% re-intervention rate. Conclusion: EjD concerns almost half of the patients presenting BPH-related LUTS. Initial evaluation of EjD impairment is primordial before medical or surgical therapy. Peri-montanal tissue preservation represents a key point for antegrade ejaculation preservation, regardless of the surgical option

Urodynamic assessment and quality of life outcomes of robot-assisted totally intracorporeal radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder for bladder cancer: a preliminary study

Purpose: Few data exist regarding the functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder. The aim of this study was to evaluate the urodynamic and functional outcomes in patients undergoing RARC and totally intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder for bladder cancer. Methods: In this monocentric, observational study carried out between 2016 and 2020, consecutive patients undergoing RARC and intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder in the Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, were included. Reconstruction was totally intracorporeal Y-shaped neobladder. Main outcomes were urodynamic findings 6 months post-surgery, continence and quality of life (QoL). Continence was defined by no pad or one safety pad. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ), International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire (IIEF-5) and Bladder Cancer Index (BCI) scores were recorded. Results: Fourteen male patients were included (median age: 64 years [IQR 54–67]. Median maximal neobladder cystometric capacity was 495 ml [IQR 410–606] and median compliance was 35.5 ml/cm H2O [IQR 28–62]. All patients had post-void residual volume < 30 ml, except for three (22%) who required clean intermittent-self catheterisation. Daytime continence was achieved in 10 patients (71%) and night-time continence in two (14.3%). Median ICIQ score was 7 [IQR 5–11]. Postoperative erectile function was present in 7% of patients (mean IIEF-5 = 5 [IQR 2–7]). Thirteen patients (93%) were satisfied with their choice of neobladder. Conclusion: RARC with totally intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder for bladder cancer provides satisfactory urodynamic results and good QoL. These findings should be confirmed long-term.SCOPUS: ar.jDecretOANoAutActifinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Preliminary assessment of patient and physician satisfaction with the use of teleconsultation in urology during the COVID-19 pandemic

International audiencePurpose: Lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic compelled urologists to change access to healthcare, especially for oncology patients. Teleconsultation is a safe way to receive medical advice without a risk of infection, and was implemented urgently in our academic centres. Our purpose was to evaluate patient and physician satisfaction with teleconsultation set up during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: From March 16th 2020, all face-to-face consultations were cancelled in France, except for emergencies. Teleconsultation was started immediately by five senior urologists in two academic hospitals. All patients received an email survey including the validated Teleconsultation Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) and demographic questions. Data were collected prospectively. Physicians also responded to the TSQ. Patient satisfaction was measured objectively with the validated 14-item TSQ. Each item was scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Factors associated with positive satisfaction with teleconsultation were assessed by multivariable logistic regression.Results: Overall, 105 patients replied to the survey (91.3%). Median age was 66 years (IQR: 55‒71) and 95 were men (90.5%). Median overall TSQ score was 67 (IQR: 60‒69); teleconsultation was judged to be a good experience by 88 patients (83.8%) and four physicians (80%). Patients who met their surgeon for the first time were more likely to have a good experience (OR = 1.2 [95% CI 1.1‒1.5], p = 0.03).Conclusion: Introduced rapidly during the COVID-19 lockdown, urology teleconsultation attained a high level of satisfaction among both patients and physicians. A major change in telemedicine use is foreseen in the post COVID-19 era

Transcriptomic Profiling of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Bladder Cancer Consensus Classification Relevance, Molecular Heterogeneity, and Differential Immune Signatures

International audienceAnalyses of large transcriptomics data sets of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) have led to a consensus classification. Molecular subtypes of upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) are less known. Our objective was to determine the relevance of the consensus classification in UTUCs by characterizing a novel cohort of surgically treated ≥pT1 tumors. Using immunohistochemistry (IHC), subtype markers GATA3-CK5/6-TUBB2B in multiplex, CK20, p16, Ki67, mismatch repair system proteins, and PD-L1 were evaluated. Heterogeneity was assessed morphologically and/or with subtype IHC. FGFR3 mutations were identified by pyrosequencing. We performed 3'RNA sequencing of each tumor, with multisampling in heterogeneous cases. Consensus classes, unsupervised groups, and microenvironment cell abundance were determined using gene expression. Most of the 66 patients were men (77.3%), with pT1 (n = 23, 34.8%) or pT2-4 stage UTUC (n = 43, 65.2%). FGFR3 mutations and mismatch repair-deficient status were identified in 40% and 4.7% of cases, respectively. Consensus subtypes robustly classified UTUCs and reflected intrinsic subgroups. All pT1 tumors were classified as luminal papillary (LumP). Combining our consensus classification results with those of previously published UTUC cohorts, LumP tumors represented 57.2% of ≥pT2 UTUCs, which was significantly higher than MIBCs. Ten patients (15.2%) harbored areas of distinct subtypes. Consensus classes were associated with FGFR3 mutations, stage, morphology, and IHC. The majority of LumP tumors were characterized by low immune infiltration and PD-L1 expression, in particular, if FGFR3 mutated. Our study shows that MIBC consensus classification robustly classified UTUCs and highlighted intratumoral molecular heterogeneity. The proportion of LumP was significantly higher in UTUCs than in MIBCs. Most LumP tumors showed low immune infiltration and PD-L1 expression and high proportion of FGFR3 mutations. These findings suggest differential response to novel therapies between patients with UTUC and those with MIBC. Copyrigh

Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries

Background Anastomotic leak affects 8 per cent of patients after right colectomy with a 10-fold increased risk of postoperative death. The EAGLE study aimed to develop and test whether an international, standardized quality improvement intervention could reduce anastomotic leaks. Methods The internationally intended protocol, iteratively co-developed by a multistage Delphi process, comprised an online educational module introducing risk stratification, an intraoperative checklist, and harmonized surgical techniques. Clusters (hospital teams) were randomized to one of three arms with varied sequences of intervention/data collection by a derived stepped-wedge batch design (at least 18 hospital teams per batch). Patients were blinded to the study allocation. Low- and middle-income country enrolment was encouraged. The primary outcome (assessed by intention to treat) was anastomotic leak rate, and subgroup analyses by module completion (at least 80 per cent of surgeons, high engagement; less than 50 per cent, low engagement) were preplanned. Results A total 355 hospital teams registered, with 332 from 64 countries (39.2 per cent low and middle income) included in the final analysis. The online modules were completed by half of the surgeons (2143 of 4411). The primary analysis included 3039 of the 3268 patients recruited (206 patients had no anastomosis and 23 were lost to follow-up), with anastomotic leaks arising before and after the intervention in 10.1 and 9.6 per cent respectively (adjusted OR 0.87, 95 per cent c.i. 0.59 to 1.30; P = 0.498). The proportion of surgeons completing the educational modules was an influence: the leak rate decreased from 12.2 per cent (61 of 500) before intervention to 5.1 per cent (24 of 473) after intervention in high-engagement centres (adjusted OR 0.36, 0.20 to 0.64; P &lt; 0.001), but this was not observed in low-engagement hospitals (8.3 per cent (59 of 714) and 13.8 per cent (61 of 443) respectively; adjusted OR 2.09, 1.31 to 3.31). Conclusion Completion of globally available digital training by engaged teams can alter anastomotic leak rates. Registration number: NCT04270721 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)