Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity: AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive versus AcrySof SA60AT monofocal intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: To compare the visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in eyes with the AcrySof ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) (Alcon) and eyes with the monofocal AcrySof SA60AT IOL. SETTING: Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Ophthalmology, Rome, and private clinical practice, Rome, Italy. METHODS: One hundred eyes had phacoemulsification cataract extraction and implantation of a ReSTOR multifocal OIL in the capsular bag. Inclusion criteria were corneal astigmatism less than 1.5 diopters (D), myopia less than 4.0 D, and no associated ocular disease. A complete ophthalmic examination, including uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity, was performed 6 months postoperatively. Results were compared with those in 40 eyes with the AcrySof monofocal IOL single-piece IOL. RESULTS: In the multifocal group, 90 eyes (90%) had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better (logMAR <0.10) and an uncorrected near visual acuity at 35 cm of J3 or better (logMAR 0.14). The multifocal group and monofocal group had similar distance uncorrected and best corrected visual acuities; however, the multifocal group had significantly better near uncorrected acuity. The mean contrast sensitivity values were 18.28 dB (static program) and 17.95 dB (dynamic program) in the multifocal group and 19.18 dB (static program) and 21.2 dB (dynamic program) in the monofocal group. CONCLUSIONS: The ReSTOR multifocal IOL provided a satisfactory full range of vision; 92% of the patients achieved total spectacle independence. Contrast sensitivity was lower than with the SA60AT monofocal IOL

Massive carcinoma of the cornea in an immunocompetent patient

n/

Efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in long standing diabetic macular edema a microperimetry and optical coherence tomography study

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in patients suffering from diffuse long standing diabetic macular edema, by the assessment of retinal thickness and retinal function by means of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and microperimetry-1. Methods: Twenty eyes received 8 mg in 0.2 mL preservative free intravitreal triamcinolone injection delivered through the pars plana. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), foveal thickness, and the average retinal sensitivity of the 45 stimuli were considered in our study. Patients were instructed to attend for OCT and microperimetry-1 follow-up at baseline, 1,3, and 6. Results: At the baseline, mean macular thickness was 692μ, ± 70μ; mean visual acuity was 0.13 ± 0.09. Mean macular sensitivity determined with the microperimetry-1 was 6.85 dB ± 2.1 dB. At the 1 month follow-up, mean OCT macular thickness decreased to 348.28μ, ± 132.10μ (P = 0.0001); mean BCVA improved to 0.23 ± 0.15 (P = 0.019); mean retinal sensitivity improved to 8.71 dB ± 2.79 dB (P = 0.03). At the 3 months follow-up, mean OCT macular thickness changed to 363.7μ ± 123.52μ (P = 0.0002); mean BCVA was 0.23 ± 0.15 (P = 0.0024); mean retinal sensitivity 8.54 dB ± 2.78 dB (P = 0.048). Six months after the injection, mean OCT macular thickness was 460.61 μ ± 104.9μ (P > 0.05); mean BCVA was 0.15 (P > 0.05); mean retinal sensitivity 7.54 dB ± 2.58 dB (P > 0.05). Conclusion: In our study, we found intravitreal effective in improving BCVA, macular thickness, and retinal sensitivities during the first 3 months. At 6 months, follow-up of the data were not dissimilar to those obtained at baseline. Further investigation is warranted to asses the correlation among daily life visual performance, retinal sensitivities, and macular thickness. RETINA 28:1270-1275, 2008 Copyright © by Ophthalmic Communications Society, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited

Scleral ossification in phthisical eyes.

Heterotopic secondary ossification of the eye usually affects intraocular tissues. Although calcium deposition in the scleral lamellae is not uncommonly observed, bone formation is only rarely associated with chromosomal abnormalities or colobomatous eyes. Herein two cases of both scleral and intraocular ossification in patients with long-standing ocular phthisis are reported. The cases of idiopathic scleral ossification, albeit exceedingly rare, suggest that osteogenic precursor cells may reside in the sclera, as well and though very rarely, these cells can also be stimulated to form heterotopic bone by a traumatic or inflammatory local event. Copyright © 2006 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC