Colorectal Cancer Stage at Diagnosis Before vs During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy

IMPORTANCE Delays in screening programs and the reluctance of patients to seek medical attention because of the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 could be associated with the risk of more advanced colorectal cancers at diagnosis. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was associated with more advanced oncologic stage and change in clinical presentation for patients with colorectal cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included all 17 938 adult patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer from March 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021 (pandemic period), and from January 1, 2018, to February 29, 2020 (prepandemic period), in 81 participating centers in Italy, including tertiary centers and community hospitals. Follow-up was 30 days from surgery. EXPOSURES Any type of surgical procedure for colorectal cancer, including explorative surgery, palliative procedures, and atypical or segmental resections. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was advanced stage of colorectal cancer at diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were distant metastasis, T4 stage, aggressive biology (defined as cancer with at least 1 of the following characteristics: signet ring cells, mucinous tumor, budding, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and lymphangitis), stenotic lesion, emergency surgery, and palliative surgery. The independent association between the pandemic period and the outcomes was assessed using multivariate random-effects logistic regression, with hospital as the cluster variable. RESULTS A total of 17 938 patients (10 007 men [55.8%]; mean [SD] age, 70.6 [12.2] years) underwent surgery for colorectal cancer: 7796 (43.5%) during the pandemic period and 10 142 (56.5%) during the prepandemic period. Logistic regression indicated that the pandemic period was significantly associated with an increased rate of advanced-stage colorectal cancer (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95%CI, 1.01-1.13; P = .03), aggressive biology (OR, 1.32; 95%CI, 1.15-1.53; P < .001), and stenotic lesions (OR, 1.15; 95%CI, 1.01-1.31; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study suggests a significant association between the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the risk of a more advanced oncologic stage at diagnosis among patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer and might indicate a potential reduction of survival for these patients

'How much raltegravir do you take?' The answer may not be so obvious: an accidental finding from clinical practice

It has been over a decade since the introduction of ralte-gravir, which has a well-established efficacy and tolera-bility profile . However, until recently, raltegravir hasonly been available as twice-daily formulations with, as aresult, a lower cumulative compliance to therapy and ahigher rate of discontinuation compared with the otheragents in the class .Following encouraging results from the ONCEMRK trial, a new raltegravir formulation of 1200 mg once dailywas introduced, and has been available in our centre sinceMay 2018. The new once-daily administration appearspromising in improving the compliance to raltegravir-con-taining regimens. However, during our routine clinicalactivity, we noticed that some of the patients recentlyswitched to raltegravir 1200 mg once daily were incor-rectly taking the drug. We then decided to investigate thisissue and to determine how widespread it was and pro-ceeded to recall all patients switched to this therapy in ourclinical centre between May 2018 and December 2018. Wethen asked our patients how they were taking raltegravirand collected their opinions on the ease of administrationof the new formulation and the onset of side effects

Early discontinuation of DTG/ABC/3TC and BIC/TAF/FTC single-tablet regimens: a real-life multicenter cohort study

Background: Data regarding the efficacy and tolerability of DTG/ABC/3TC/and BIC/TAF/FTC in switching strategies are still scarce. The rates and reasons of early discontinuation within 24 weeks from the switch to dolutegravir (DTG) or bictegravir (BIC) single-tablet regimens (STRs) were compared.Methods: This is a multicenter cohort study. Persons living with HIV (PLWH) with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL switching to BIC-STR or DTG-STR were included and followed-up 24 weeks. Major outcome was the analysis of (quantitative assessment of) discontinuation due to adverse events and self-suspension (EDAEs). Second, we assessed virologic failure (VF), and all-cause discontinuation (EDAC). Cox model for regression analysis was employed.Results: We included 786 PLWH: 524 with DTG, 262 with BIC. At week 24, we observed 70 EDAC: 5 for VF (1 with BIC and 4 with DTG; p = 0.6276), 10 simplifications, more frequently with BIC than DTG (n = 5, 1.9% and n = 5, 0.9%; p = 0.072) and 55 EDAEs, 7 (2.7%) with BIC, 48 (9.2%) with DTG (p = 0.0323). EDAEs due to neurological and gastrointestinal toxicity were similar (p = 0.2398 and p = 0.1160, respectively). There were no significant differences in the rates of VF and EDAC. EDAEs rate was significantly higher for DTG than for BIC. The adjusted HR for EDAEs in DTG group was 3.28 (95% CI: 1.34-8.00; p = 0.009). We identified an association between EDAE in the DTG group and having an age >60 and having switched from a regimen without ABC.Conclusions: PLWH who received DTG or BIC do not show differences in VF or EDAC rates. However, EDAEs is more frequent with DTG especially in the over-sixties and in those who come from regimens without abacavir

Early discontinuation of DTG/ABC/3TC and BIC/TAF/FTC single-tablet regimens: a real-life multicenter cohort study

Background: Data regarding the efficacy and tolerability of DTG/ABC/3TC/and BIC/TAF/FTC in switching strategies are still scarce. The rates and reasons of early discontinuation within 24 weeks from the switch to dolutegravir (DTG) or bictegravir (BIC) single-tablet regimens (STRs) were compared. Methods: This is a multicenter cohort study. Persons living with HIV (PLWH) with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL switching to BIC-STR or DTG-STR were included and followed-up 24 weeks. Major outcome was the analysis of (quantitative assessment of) discontinuation due to adverse events and self-suspension (EDAEs). Second, we assessed virologic failure (VF), and all-cause discontinuation (EDAC). Cox model for regression analysis was employed. Results: We included 786 PLWH: 524 with DTG, 262 with BIC. At week 24, we observed 70 EDAC: 5 for VF (1 with BIC and 4 with DTG; p = 0.6276), 10 simplifications, more frequently with BIC than DTG (n = 5, 1.9% and n = 5, 0.9%; p = 0.072) and 55 EDAEs, 7 (2.7%) with BIC, 48 (9.2%) with DTG (p = 0.0323). EDAEs due to neurological and gastrointestinal toxicity were similar (p = 0.2398 and p = 0.1160, respectively). There were no significant differences in the rates of VF and EDAC. EDAEs rate was significantly higher for DTG than for BIC. The adjusted HR for EDAEs in DTG group was 3.28 (95% CI: 1.34-8.00; p = 0.009). We identified an association between EDAE in the DTG group and having an age >60 and having switched from a regimen without ABC. Conclusions: PLWH who received DTG or BIC do not show differences in VF or EDAC rates. However, EDAEs is more frequent with DTG especially in the over-sixties and in those who come from regimens without abacavir

Early discontinuation of DTG/ABC/3TC and BIC/TAF/FTC single-tablet regimens: a real-life multicenter cohort study

Background: Data regarding the efficacy and tolerability of DTG/ABC/3TC/and BIC/TAF/FTC in switching strategies are still scarce. The rates and reasons of early discontinuation within 24 weeks from the switch to dolutegravir (DTG) or bictegravir (BIC) single-tablet regimens (STRs) were compared. Methods: This is a multicenter cohort study. Persons living with HIV (PLWH) with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL switching to BIC-STR or DTG-STR were included and followed-up 24 weeks. Major outcome was the analysis of (quantitative assessment of) discontinuation due to adverse events and self-suspension (EDAEs). Second, we assessed virologic failure (VF), and all-cause discontinuation (EDAC). Cox model for regression analysis was employed. Results: We included 786 PLWH: 524 with DTG, 262 with BIC. At week 24, we observed 70 EDAC: 5 for VF (1 with BIC and 4 with DTG; p = 0.6276), 10 simplifications, more frequently with BIC than DTG (n = 5, 1.9% and n = 5, 0.9%; p = 0.072) and 55 EDAEs, 7 (2.7%) with BIC, 48 (9.2%) with DTG (p = 0.0323). EDAEs due to neurological and gastrointestinal toxicity were similar (p = 0.2398 and p = 0.1160, respectively). There were no significant differences in the rates of VF and EDAC. EDAEs rate was significantly higher for DTG than for BIC. The adjusted HR for EDAEs in DTG group was 3.28 (95% CI: 1.34-8.00; p = 0.009). We identified an association between EDAE in the DTG group and having an age >60 and having switched from a regimen without ABC. Conclusions: PLWH who received DTG or BIC do not show differences in VF or EDAC rates. However, EDAEs is more frequent with DTG especially in the over-sixties and in those who come from regimens without abacavir

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome after intramuscular oxygen-ozone therapy

N

Long-Term Serological Response to 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Versus 23-Valent Polysaccharide Vaccine in HIV-Infected Adults

INTRODUCTION: Long-term comparative immunologic response to 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) versus 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) among HIV-infected adults has not yet been investigated. METHODS: In this prospective pilot study, we quantified in HIV-positive adults serotype-specific IgG concentrations of the 12 pneumococcal serotypes shared by both vaccines 5 years after vaccination with two doses of PCV13 8 weeks apart (group 1) or one dose of PPV23 (group 2) and compared them with those assessed prior to vaccination (BL) and after 1 year (T1). Comparison of immunogenicity was based on geometric mean concentration (GMC), proportion of individuals with\u2009 65\u2009twofold increase from BL in specific antibody concentration against\u2009 65\u20092 serotypes and percentage of individuals with serotype-specific IgG\u2009 65\u20090.35 \u3bcg/ml,\u2009 65\u20091 \u3bcg/ml and\u2009 65\u2009individual serotype-specific correlates of protection. RESULTS: We included 91 subjects (median CD4+ 650 cells/\ub5l,\u2009>\u200990% with HIV-RNA\u2009<\u200950 copies/ml); patients in groups 1 (n\u2009=\u200942) and 2 (n\u2009=\u200949) were homogeneous for the main characteristics. GMCs were significantly higher in the PCV13 group than in the PPV23 group for serotype 19F (p\u2009=\u20090.003). Both vaccines revealed higher significant GMCs to most serotypes compared with BL, i.e., eight in group 1 vs. seven in group 2. With respect to T1, GMCs decreased significantly in the PCV13 group for eight vs. ten serotypes in the PPV23 group. More participants in the PCV13 group had\u2009 65\u20092 increase from BL in antibody levels to\u2009 65\u20092 serotypes compared with the PPV23 group (78.6% vs. 59.2%, p\u2009=\u20090.042). Overall, the percentage of subjects with serotype-specific IgG\u2009 65\u20090.35 \u3bcg/ml,\u2009 65\u20091 \u3bcg/ml and\u2009 65\u2009individual serotype-specific correlates of protection was similar between groups. CONCLUSION: In this study with HIV-positive adults with a favorable viro-immunologic profile, both vaccines were shown to achieve a long-term durable serologic response. We found minor differences in immunogenicity between the two vaccines, which favored PCV13 over PPV23 5 years after immunization