11 research outputs found

    Cytokinins – regulators of de novo shoot organogenesis

    Get PDF
    Plants, unlike animals, possess a unique developmental plasticity, that allows them to adapt to changing environmental conditions. A fundamental aspect of this plasticity is their ability to undergo postembryonic de novo organogenesis. This requires the presence of regulators that trigger and mediate specific spatiotemporal changes in developmental programs. The phytohormone cytokinin has been known as a principal regulator of plant development for more than six decades. In de novo shoot organogenesis and in vitro shoot regeneration, cytokinins are the prime candidates for the signal that determines shoot identity. Both processes of de novo shoot apical meristem development are accompanied by changes in gene expression, cell fate reprogramming, and the switching-on of the shoot-specific homeodomain regulator, WUSCHEL. Current understanding about the role of cytokinins in the shoot regeneration will be discussed

    Role of alternative telomere lengthening unmasked in telomerase knock-out mutant plants

    Get PDF
    Telomeres in many eukaryotes are maintained by telomerase in whose absence telomere shortening occurs. However, telomerase-deficient Arabidopsis thaliana mutants (Attert(-/-)) show extremely low rates of telomere shortening per plant generation (250-500 bp), which does not correspond to the expected outcome of replicative telomere shortening resulting from ca. 1,000 meristem cell divisions per seed-to-seed generation. To investigate the influence of the number of cell divisions per seed-to-seed generation, Attert(-/-) mutant plants were propagated from seeds coming either from the lower-most or the upper-most siliques (L- and U-plants) and the length of their telomeres were followed over several generations. The rate of telomere shortening was faster in U-plants, than in L-plants, as would be expected from their higher number of cell divisions per generation. However, this trend was observed only in telomeres whose initial length is relatively high and the differences decreased with progressive general telomere shortening over generations. But in generation 4, the L-plants frequently show a net telomere elongation, while the U-plants fail to do so. We propose that this is due to the activation of alternative telomere lengthening (ALT), a process which is activated in early embryonic development in both U- and L-plants, but is overridden in U-plants due to their higher number of cell divisions per generation. These data demonstrate what so far has only been speculated, that in the absence of telomerase, the number of cell divisions within one generation influences the control of telomere lengths. These results also reveal a fast and efficient activation of ALT mechanism(s) in response to the loss of telomerase activity and imply that ALT is probably involved also in normal plant development

    GOLEM: distribution of Gene regulatOry eLEMents within the plant promoters

    Full text link
    Motivation: The regulation of gene expression during tissue development is extremely complex. One of the key regulatory mechanisms of gene expression involves the recognition of regulatory motifs by various proteins in the promoter regions of many genes. Localisation of these motifs in proximity to the transcription start site (TSS) or translation start site (ATG) is critical for regulating the initiation and rate of transcription. The levels of transcription of individual genes, regulated by these motifs, can vary signifi cantly in diff erent tissues and developmental stages, especially during tightly regulated processes such as sexual reproduction. However, the precise localisation and visualisation of the regulatory motifs within gene promoters with respect to gene transcription in specifi c tissues, can be challenging. Results: Here, we introduce a program called GOLEM (Gene regulatOry eLEMents) which enables users to precisely locate any motif of interest with respect to TSS or ATG within the relevant plant genomes across the plant Tree of Life (Marchantia, Physcomitrium, Amborella, Oryza, Zea, Solanum and Arabidopsis). The visualisation of the motifs is performed with respect to the transcript levels of particular genes in leaves and male reproductive tissues, and can be compared with genome-wide distribution regardless of the transcription level. Availability and implementation: GOLEM is freely available at https://golem.ncbr.muni.cz and its source codes are provided under the MIT licence at GitHub at https://github.com/sb-ncbr/golem.Comment: 4 pages, 1 figur

    Composition and Function of Telomerase—A Polymerase Associated with the Origin of Eukaryotes

    No full text
    The canonical DNA polymerases involved in the replication of the genome are unable to fully replicate the physical ends of linear chromosomes, called telomeres. Chromosomal termini thus become shortened in each cell cycle. The maintenance of telomeres requires telomerase—a specific RNA-dependent DNA polymerase enzyme complex that carries its own RNA template and adds telomeric repeats to the ends of chromosomes using a reverse transcription mechanism. Both core subunits of telomerase—its catalytic telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) subunit and telomerase RNA (TR) component—were identified in quick succession in Tetrahymena more than 30 years ago. Since then, both telomerase subunits have been described in various organisms including yeasts, mammals, birds, reptiles and fish. Despite the fact that telomerase activity in plants was described 25 years ago and the TERT subunit four years later, a genuine plant TR has only recently been identified by our group. In this review, we focus on the structure, composition and function of telomerases. In addition, we discuss the origin and phylogenetic divergence of this unique RNA-dependent DNA polymerase as a witness of early eukaryotic evolution. Specifically, we discuss the latest information regarding the recently discovered TR component in plants, its conservation and its structural features

    Telomeres in Plants and Humans: Not So Different, Not So Similar

    No full text
    Parallel research on multiple model organisms shows that while some principles of telomere biology are conserved among all eukaryotic kingdoms, we also find some deviations that reflect different evolutionary paths and life strategies, which may have diversified after the establishment of telomerase as a primary mechanism for telomere maintenance. Much more than animals, plants have to cope with environmental stressors, including genotoxic factors, due to their sessile lifestyle. This is, in principle, made possible by an increased capacity and efficiency of the molecular systems ensuring maintenance of genome stability, as well as a higher tolerance to genome instability. Furthermore, plant ontogenesis differs from that of animals in which tissue differentiation and telomerase silencing occur during early embryonic development, and the “telomere clock” in somatic cells may act as a preventive measure against carcinogenesis. This does not happen in plants, where growth and ontogenesis occur through the serial division of apical meristems consisting of a small group of stem cells that generate a linear series of cells, which differentiate into an array of cell types that make a shoot and root. Flowers, as generative plant organs, initiate from the shoot apical meristem in mature plants which is incompatible with the human-like developmental telomere shortening. In this review, we discuss differences between human and plant telomere biology and the implications for aging, genome stability, and cell and organism survival. In particular, we provide a comprehensive comparative overview of telomere proteins acting in humans and in Arabidopsis thaliana model plant, and discuss distinct epigenetic features of telomeric chromatin in these species

    Histone H1 protects telomeric repeats from H3K27me3 invasion in Arabidopsis

    Get PDF
    Linker histones play a pivotal role in shaping chromatin architecture, notably through their globular H1 (GH1) domain that contacts the nucleosome and linker DNA. Yet, the interplay of H1 with chromatin factors along the epigenome landscape is poorly understood. Here, we report that Arabidopsis H1 favors chromatin compaction and H3K27me3 marking on a majority of Polycomb-targeted protein-coding genes while preventing H3K27me3 accumulation on telomeres and pericentromeric interstitial telomeric repeats (ITRs). These contrasting effects of H1 on H3K27me3 enrichment are associated with long-distance effects on the 3D organization of telomeres and ITRs. Mechanistically, H1 prevents ITRs from being invaded by Telomere Repeat Binding 1 (TRB1), a GH1-containing telomere component with an extra-telomeric function in targeting Polycomb to genes bearing telomeric motifs. We propose that reciprocal DNA binding of H1 and TRB1 to clustered telobox motifs prevents H3K27me3 accumulation on large chromosomal blocks, conferring a sequence-specific role to H1 in epigenome homeostasis

    Histone H1 protects telomeric repeats from H3K27me3 invasion in Arabidopsis

    No full text
    Summary: While the pivotal role of linker histone H1 in shaping nucleosome organization is well established, its functional interplays with chromatin factors along the epigenome are just starting to emerge. Here we show that, in Arabidopsis, as in mammals, H1 occupies Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) target genes where it favors chromatin condensation and H3K27me3 deposition. We further show that, contrasting with its conserved function in PRC2 activation at genes, H1 selectively prevents H3K27me3 accumulation at telomeres and large pericentromeric interstitial telomeric repeat (ITR) domains by restricting DNA accessibility to Telomere Repeat Binding (TRB) proteins, a group of H1-related Myb factors mediating PRC2 cis recruitment. This study provides a mechanistic framework by which H1 avoids the formation of gigantic H3K27me3-rich domains at telomeric sequences and contributes to safeguard nucleus architecture
    corecore