7 research outputs found

    Spatial Variation of Aerosol Chemical Composition and Organic Components Identified by Positive Matrix Factorization in the Barcelona Region

    No full text
    The spatial distribution of PM<sub>1</sub> components in the Barcelona metropolitan area was investigated using on-road mobile measurements of atmospheric particle- and gas-phase compounds during the DAURE campaign in March 2009. Positive matrix factorization (PMF) applied to organic aerosol (OA) data yielded 5 factors: hydrocarbon-like OA (HOA), cooking OA (COA), biomass burning OA (BBOA), and low volatility and semivolatile oxygenated OA (LV-OOA and SV-OOA). The area under investigation (∼500 km<sup>2</sup>) was divided into six zones (city center, harbor, industrial area, precoastal depression, 2 mountain ranges) for measurements and data analysis. Mean zonal OA concentrations are 4.9–9.5 μg m<sup>–3</sup>. The area is heavily impacted by local primary emissions (HOA 14–38%, COA 10–18%, BBOA 10–12% of OA); concentrations of traffic-related components, especially black carbon, are biased high due to the on-road nature of the measurements. The formation of secondary OA adds more than half of the OA burden outside the city center (SV-OOA 14–40%, LV-OOA 17–42% of OA). A case study of one measurement drive from the shore to the precoastal mountain range furthest downwind of the city center indicates the importance of nonfossil over anthropogenic secondary OA based on OA/CO

    Submicron Aerosol Composition and Source Contribution across the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, in Winter

    No full text
    The Kathmandu valley experiences an average wintertime PM1 concentration of ∼100 μg m–3 and daily peaks over 200 μg m–3. We present ambient nonrefractory PM1 chemical composition, and concentration measured by a mini aerosol mass spectrometer (mAMS) sequentially at Dhulikhel (on the valley exterior), then urban Ratnapark, and finally suburban Lalitpur in winter 2018. At all sites, organic aerosol (OA) was the largest contributor to combined PM1 (C-PM1) (49%) and black carbon (BC) was the second largest contributor (21%). The average background C-PM1 at Dhulikhel was 48 μg m–3; the urban enhancement was 120% (58 μg m–3). BC had an average of 6.1 μg m–3 at Dhulikhel, an urban enhancement of 17.4 μg m–3. Sulfate (SO4) was 3.6 μg m–3 at Dhulikhel, then 7.5 μg m–3 at Ratnapark, and 12.0 μg m–3 at Lalitpur in the brick kiln region. Chloride (Chl) increased by 330 and 250% from Dhulikhel to Ratnapark and Lalitpur on average. Positive matrix factorization (PMF) identified seven OA sources, four primary OA sources, hydrocarbon-like (HOA), biomass burning (BBOA), trash burning (TBOA), a sulfate-containing local OA source (sLOA), and three secondary oxygenated organic aerosols (OOA). OOA was the largest fraction of OA, over 50% outside the valley and 36% within. HOA (traffic) was the most prominent primary source, contributing 21% of all OA and 44% of BC. Brick kilns were the second largest contributor to C-PM1, 12% of OA, 33% of BC, and a primary emitter of aerosol sulfate. These results, though successive, indicate the importance of multisite measurements to understand ambient particulate matter concentration heterogeneity across urban regions

    Atmospheric Emission Characterization of Marcellus Shale Natural Gas Development Sites

    No full text
    Limited direct measurements of criteria pollutants emissions and precursors, as well as natural gas constituents, from Marcellus shale gas development activities contribute to uncertainty about their atmospheric impact. Real-time measurements were made with the Aerodyne Research Inc. Mobile Laboratory to characterize emission rates of atmospheric pollutants. Sites investigated include production well pads, a well pad with a drill rig, a well completion, and compressor stations. Tracer release ratio methods were used to estimate emission rates. A first-order correction factor was developed to account for errors introduced by fenceline tracer release. In contrast to observations from other shale plays, elevated volatile organic compounds, other than CH<sub>4</sub> and C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub>, were generally not observed at the investigated sites. Elevated submicrometer particle mass concentrations were also generally not observed. Emission rates from compressor stations ranged from 0.006 to 0.162 tons per day (tpd) for NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, 0.029 to 0.426 tpd for CO, and 67.9 to 371 tpd for CO<sub>2</sub>. CH<sub>4</sub> and C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub> emission rates from compressor stations ranged from 0.411 to 4.936 tpd and 0.023 to 0.062 tpd, respectively. Although limited in sample size, this study provides emission rate estimates for some processes in a newly developed natural gas resource and contributes valuable comparisons to other shale gas studies

    Wintertime Air Quality across the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: Concentration, Composition, and Sources of Fine and Coarse Particulate Matter

    No full text
    The Kathmandu Valley in Nepal experiences poor air quality, especially in the dry winter season. In this study, we investigated the concentration, chemical composition, and sources of fine and coarse particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10, and PM10–2.5) at three sites within or near the Kathmandu Valley during the winter of 2018 as part of the second Nepal Ambient Monitoring and Source Testing Experiment (NAMaSTE 2). Daily PM2.5 concentrations were very high throughout the study period, ranging 72–149 μg m–3 at the urban Ratnapark site in Kathmandu, 88–161 μg m–3 at the suburban Lalitpur site, and 40–74 μg m–3 at rural Dhulikhel on the eastern rim of the Kathmandu Valley. Meanwhile, PM10 ranged 194–309, 174–377, and 64–131 μg m–3, respectively. At the Ratnapark site, crustal materials from resuspended soil contributed an average of 11% of PM2.5 and 34% of PM10. PM2.5 was largely comprised of organic carbon (OC, 28–30% by mass) and elemental carbon (EC, 10–14% by mass). As determined by chemical mass balance source apportionment modeling, major PM2.5 OC sources were garbage burning (15–21%), biomass burning (10–17%), and fossil fuel (14–26%). Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) contributions from aromatic volatile organic compounds (13–23% OC) were larger than those from isoprene (0.3–0.5%), monoterpenes (0.9–1.4%), and sesquiterpenes (3.6–4.4%). Nitro-monoaromatic compoundsof interest due to their light-absorbing properties and toxicityindicate the presence of biomass burning-derived SOA. Knowledge of primary and secondary PM sources can facilitate air quality management in this region

    Assessing the Oxidative Potential of Outdoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Wintertime Fairbanks, Alaska

    No full text
    The oxidative potential (OP) of outdoor PM2.5 in wintertime Fairbanks, Alaska, is investigated and compared to those in wintertime Atlanta and Los Angeles. Approximately 40 filter samples collected in January–February 2022 at a Fairbanks residential site were analyzed for OP utilizing dithiothreitol-depletion (OPDTT) and hydroxyl-generation (OPOH) assays. The study-average PM2.5 mass concentration was 12.8 μg/m3, with a 1 h average maximum of 89.0 μg/m3. Regression analysis, correlations with source tracers, and contrast between cold and warmer events indicated that OPDTT was mainly sensitive to copper, elemental carbon, and organic aerosol from residential wood burning, and OPOH to iron and organic aerosol from vehicles. Despite low photochemically-driven oxidation rates, the water-soluble fraction of OPDTT was unusually high at 77%, mainly from wood burning emissions. In contrast to other locations, the Fairbanks average PM2.5 mass concentration was higher than Atlanta and Los Angeles, whereas OPDTT in Fairbanks and Atlanta were similar, and Los Angeles had the highest OPDTT and OPOH. Site differences were observed in OP when normalized by both the volume of air sampled and the particle mass concentration, corresponding to exposure and the intrinsic health-related properties of PM2.5, respectively. The sensitivity of OP assays to specific aerosol components and sources can provide insights beyond the PM2.5 mass concentration when assessing air quality

    Goetz_etal_2017_data

    No full text
    The zip file holds six tab delimited text files that contain 1 Hz mobile lab data and accompanying local background estimates from 2012 measurements in SW PA and NE PA and 2015 measurements in NE PA. See publication for more details. The provided local background data is derived from 20 minute 35th percentile smoothing. All time information is in military format. Date information is in mm/dd/yy. Concentration data is in units of ppbv. GPS data is in units of decimal degrees and in datum WGS84. Please contact authors if additional information is needed. All use of the provided data should be accompanied by the proper citations

    Apportionment of Primary and Secondary Organic Aerosols in Southern California during the 2005 Study of Organic Aerosols in Riverside (SOAR-1)

    No full text
    Ambient sampling was conducted in Riverside, California during the 2005 Study of Organic Aerosols in Riverside to characterize the composition and sources of organic aerosol using a variety of state-of-the-art instrumentation and source apportionment techniques. The secondary organic aerosol (SOA) mass is estimated by elemental carbon and carbon monoxide tracer methods, water soluble organic carbon content, chemical mass balance of organic molecular markers, and positive matrix factorization of high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometer data. Estimates obtained from each of these methods indicate that the organic fraction in ambient aerosol is overwhelmingly secondary in nature during a period of several weeks with moderate ozone concentrations and that SOA is the single largest component of PM<sub>1</sub> aerosol in Riverside. Average SOA/OA contributions of 70−90% were observed during midday periods, whereas minimum SOA contributions of ∼45% were observed during peak morning traffic periods. These results are contrary to previous estimates of SOA throughout the Los Angeles Basin which reported that, other than during severe photochemical smog episodes, SOA was lower than primary OA. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed
    corecore