Variability in electrodiagnostic findings associated with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) is a heterogeneous and often disputed entity. An electrodiagnostic pattern of T1 > C8 axon involvement is considered characteristic for the diagnosis of NTOS. However, since the advent of high-resolution nerve ultrasound (US) imaging, we have encountered several patients with a proven entrapment of the lower brachial plexus who showed a different, variable electrodiagnostic pattern. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, 14 patients with an NTOS diagnosis with a verified source of compression of the lower brachial plexus and abnormal findings on their electrodiagnostic testing were included. Their medical records were reviewed to obtain clinical, imaging, and electrodiagnostic data. RESULTS: Seven patients showed results consistent with the "classic" T1 axon  > C8 pattern of involvement. Less typical findings included equally severe involvement of T1 and C8 axons, more severe C8 involvement, pure motor abnormalities, neurogenic changes on needle electromyography in the flexor carpi radialis and biceps brachii muscles, and one patient with an abnormal sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude for the median sensory response recorded from the third digit. Patients with atypical findings on electrodiagnostic testing underwent nerve imaging more often compared to patients with classic findings (seven of seven patients vs. five of seven respectively), especially nerve ultrasound. DISCUSSION: When there is a clinical suspicion of NTOS, an electrodiagnostic finding other than the classic T1 > C8 pattern of involvement does not rule out the diagnosis. High resolution nerve imaging is valuable to diagnose additional patients with this treatable condition

Diagnostic accuracy of automated oscillometric determination of the ankle-brachial index in peripheral artery disease

Objective: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is underdiagnosed in primary care settings, partly because of limited accuracy of the Doppler ankle-brachial index (ABI). This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of an automated oscillometric ABI device compared with reference standard vascular laboratory Doppler ABI equipment and to examine the influence of oscillometric errors on performance. Methods: Consecutive patients who were referred to a large general hospital for an ABI measurement were invited to participate. In each patient, the oscillometric analysis was followed by the Doppler analysis. Legs with incompressible ankle arteries were excluded from analysis. ABI values were compared using the Bland-Altman method. Oscillometric errors were defined as the incapacity of the oscillometer to report a value of ABI. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed, and the area under the curve was computed. Results: A total of 201 patients participated. The Bland-Altman plot showed a mean difference of 0.05 +/- 0.12 (limits of agreement, -0.20 to 0.29), representing a small ABI overestimation after oscillometry. Oscillometric errors occurred more commonly in limbs with PAD than in limbs without PAD (28% and 7%, respectively; P < .001). Considering a 0.9 threshold and after oscillometric error exclusion, the oscillometric ABI showed a 74% sensitivity and a 97% specificity for a diagnosis of PAD. When oscillometric errors were considered as abnormal ABIs, sensitivity increased to 86% and specificity was maintained at 95%. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed an area under the curve of 0.96. The best oscillometric ABI cutoff point was 1.00. Using this threshold and when considering oscillometric errors as abnormal ABIs, sensitivity improved to 94% while maintaining specificity at 92%. Conclusions: Oscillometric ABI showed good diagnostic accuracy compared with the reference standard. However, the high incidence of oscillometric errors and the challenges to correctly interpret readings may limit the use of the oscillometric method in PAD diagnosis

Feasibility and Outcomes of a Multidisciplinary Care Pathway for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE: The North American Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) reporting standards for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) were published in 2016 to produce consistency in the diagnosis and treatment of NTOS, but outcomes resulting from following these standards are not yet available. The results of a standardised multidisciplinary care pathway for NTOS based on the North American SVS reporting standards for NTOS are reported. METHODS: Patients referred between August 2016 and December 2019 with suspected NTOS were evaluated in this single center prospective cohort study. Diagnosis and treatment were performed according to a care pathway based on the North American SVS reporting standards. The outcome of surgically treated patients was determined by the Derkash score, thoracic outlet syndrome disability scale (TDS), Cervical Brachial Score Questionnaire (CBSQ), Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hands Dutch language version (DASH-DLV) and Short Form-12 (SF-12) at three, six, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: Of 856 referred patients, 476 (55.6%) patients were diagnosed with NTOS. Dedicated physiotherapy was successful in 186 patients (39.1%). Surgical treatment was performed in 290 (60.9%) patients of whom 274 were included in the follow up. At a mean follow up of 16.9 ± 9.2 months, significant improvement (p < .001) in TDS, CBSQ, DASH-DLV, and SF-12 scores was seen in the surgical group between baseline and all follow up intervals. Derkash outcome after surgical intervention was excellent in 83 (30.3%), good in 114 (41.6%), fair in 43 (15.7%), and poor in 34 (12.4%) of the patients. Complications occurred in 16 (5.8%) patients, and 32 (10.4%) patients experienced recurrent or persistent NTOS complaints. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary care pathway based on the North American SVS reporting standards for NTOS helped to confirm the diagnosis in 56% of patients referred, and guided the selection of patients who might benefit from thoracic outlet decompression surgery after unsuccessful dedicated physiotherapy. Intermediate follow up showed good outcomes in the majority of surgically treated patients

Limited adherence to peripheral arterial disease guidelines and suboptimal ankle brachial index reliability in Dutch primary care

\u3cp\u3eObjective/Background: The Dutch College of General Practitioners' guideline on peripheral arterial disease (PAD) provides clear recommendations on the management of PAD. An ankle brachial index (ABI) measurement, prescription of antiplatelet drugs and statins, and supervised exercise therapy (SET) for intermittent claudication (IC) are advised. The aims of this study were to determine the adherence of general practitioners (GPs) to their own guideline on PAD and to evaluate the reliability of primary care ABI measurements. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. All patients suspected of having symptomatic PAD who were referred by GPs to a large hospital in 2015 were evaluated regarding three of the guideline criteria: (i) ABI measurement; (ii) prescription of secondary prevention; (iii) initiation of SET. ABI values obtained in primary care and the hospital's vascular laboratory were compared using correlation coefficients and regression analysis. An abnormal ABI was defined as a value &lt;.9 (normal ABI ≥.9). Results: Of 308 potential patients with new onset PAD, 58% (n = 178) had undergone ABI measurement prior to referral. A modest correlation between ABI values obtained in primary care and the vascular laboratory was found (r =.63, p &lt;.001). Furthermore, a moderate reliability was calculated (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.49–0.69, p &lt;.001). Of the new patients with an abnormal ABI, 59% used antiplatelet drugs and 55% used statins. A referral for SET was initiated by a GP in 10% of new PAD patients with IC symptoms. Conclusions: Adherence by Dutch GPs to their own society's PAD guideline has room for improvement. The reliability of ABI measurements is suboptimal, whereas rates of prescription of secondary prevention and initiation of SET as primary treatment for IC need upgrading.\u3c/p\u3

Body mass index and complications following major gastrointestinal surgery: A prospective, international cohort study and meta-analysis

Aim Previous studies reported conflicting evidence on the effects of obesity on outcomes after gastrointestinal surgery. The aims of this study were to explore the relationship of obesity with major postoperative complications in an international cohort and to present a metaanalysis of all available prospective data. Methods This prospective, multicentre study included adults undergoing both elective and emergency gastrointestinal resection, reversal of stoma or formation of stoma. The primary end-point was 30-day major complications (Clavien\u2013Dindo Grades III\u2013V). A systematic search was undertaken for studies assessing the relationship between obesity and major complications after gastrointestinal surgery. Individual patient meta-analysis was used to analyse pooled results. Results This study included 2519 patients across 127 centres, of whom 560 (22.2%) were obese. Unadjusted major complication rates were lower in obese vs normal weight patients (13.0% vs 16.2%, respectively), but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.863) on multivariate analysis for patients having surgery for either malignant or benign conditions. Individual patient meta-analysis demonstrated that obese patients undergoing surgery formalignancy were at increased risk of major complications (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.49\u20132.96, P &lt; 0.001), whereas obese patients undergoing surgery for benign indications were at decreased risk (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46\u20130.75, P &lt; 0.001) compared to normal weight patients. Conclusions In our international data, obesity was not found to be associated with major complications following gastrointestinal surgery. Meta-analysis of available prospective data made a novel finding of obesity being associated with different outcomes depending on whether patients were undergoing surgery for benign or malignant disease