7 research outputs found

    Evaluating expert-based habitat suitability information of terrestrial mammals with GPS-tracking data

    Get PDF
    Aim Macroecological studies that require habitat suitability data for many species often derive this information from expert opinion. However, expert-based information is inherently subjective and thus prone to errors. The increasing availability of GPS tracking data offers opportunities to evaluate and supplement expert-based information with detailed empirical evidence. Here, we compared expert-based habitat suitability information from the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with habitat suitability information derived from GPS-tracking data of 1,498 individuals from 49 mammal species. Location Worldwide. Time period 1998-2021. Major taxa studied Forty-nine terrestrial mammal species. Methods Using GPS data, we estimated two measures of habitat suitability for each individual animal: proportional habitat use (proportion of GPS locations within a habitat type), and selection ratio (habitat use relative to its availability). For each individual we then evaluated whether the GPS-based habitat suitability measures were in agreement with the IUCN data. To that end, we calculated the probability that the ranking of empirical habitat suitability measures was in agreement with IUCN's classification into suitable, marginal and unsuitable habitat types. Results IUCN habitat suitability data were in accordance with the GPS data (> 95% probability of agreement) for 33 out of 49 species based on proportional habitat use estimates and for 25 out of 49 species based on selection ratios. In addition, 37 and 34 species had a > 50% probability of agreement based on proportional habitat use and selection ratios, respectively. Main conclusions We show how GPS-tracking data can be used to evaluate IUCN habitat suitability data. Our findings indicate that for the majority of species included in this study, it is appropriate to use IUCN habitat suitability data in macroecological studies. Furthermore, we show that GPS-tracking data can be used to identify and prioritize species and habitat types for re-evaluation of IUCN habitat suitability data

    Identification and evaluation of nextgeneration PTM-specific antibodies:A microarray-based approach

    No full text

    KonkursgÀldenÀrs skiljeavtal : nÀr binder avtalet konkursboet?

    No full text
    Syftet med denna kandidatuppsats Ă€r att beskriva gĂ€llande rĂ€tt kring om och nĂ€r en konkursgĂ€ldenĂ€rs skiljeavtal binder dess konkursbo samt konsekvenserna av detta. I dagslĂ€get Ă€r rĂ€ttsomrĂ„det osĂ€kert och enbart grundat pĂ„ praxis, uppsatsen utreder dĂ€rför Ă€ven om lagstiftning eller annan utveckling pĂ„ omrĂ„det Ă€r erforderlig. Det har i praxis konstaterats att en konkursgĂ€ldenĂ€rs skiljeavtal binder dess konkursbo dĂ„ tvister gĂ€ller obligationsrĂ€ttsliga ansprĂ„k och bevakningsförfaranden Ă€r aktuella. I praxis kan vidare konstateras att i tvister av sak- och föreningsrĂ€ttslig karaktĂ€r Ă€r ett konkursbo inte bundet av konkursgĂ€ldenĂ€rs skiljeavtal. Tvister avgörs dĂ„ i enlighet med konkursrĂ€ttens tvistlösningsmetoder. Juridisk metod anvĂ€nds för att beskriva gĂ€llande rĂ€tt och för att bringa klarhet i de grundlĂ€ggande bestĂ€mmelserna pĂ„ omrĂ„det anvĂ€nds en deskriptiv metod. En problemorienterad metod anvĂ€nds för att analysera rĂ€ttslĂ€get. Konsekvenserna av att ett konkursbo Ă€r bundet av konkursgĂ€ldenĂ€rens skiljeavtal Ă€r att en borgenĂ€r kan, genom sin skiljeklausul, komma att tillgodogöra sig mer ur konkursboets egendomsmassa Ă€n övriga borgenĂ€rer med bevakade fordringar i konkursen som inte avtalat om skiljeförfarande. Att konkursboet i obligationsrĂ€ttsliga fall Ă€r bundet att tvista i ett skiljeförfarande, trots att boet inte existerat vid skiljeavtalets uppkomst, innebĂ€r att en kollision mellan offentlig- och civilrĂ€tt uppstĂ„r. Författarna anser avslutningsvis att konkursgĂ€ldenĂ€rs skiljeklausul inte ska binda dess konkursbo. De sak- och föreningsrĂ€ttsliga rĂ€ttsfallen Ă€r mer klara i sina argument och utveckling av rĂ€ttslĂ€get bör dĂ€rför, enligt författarna, ske i samförstĂ„nd med dessa bedömningar.The purpose of this bachelor’s thesis is to investigate current law whether if and when a bankruptcy debtor’s arbitration agreement is binding towards its bankrupt’s estate and the consequences of this. The legal position is in the current situation uncertain and is solely based on legal cases; the thesis investigates therefore whether legislation or other development within the area is required.  It has been stated through legal cases that bankruptcy debtor’s arbitration agreement is binding towards its bankruptcy estate when the conflict refers to claims on law of obligations and when monitoring procedures are in question. Case law furthermore state that the bankruptcy estate is not bound by its bankruptcy debtor’s arbitration agreement in conflicts concerning law of property and rights of association. A traditional legal method has been used in order to investigate current law and a descriptive method has been used to clarify the fundamental provisions in the area. A problem-oriented method has been used in order to analyze the legal position. The consequences of the binding effect of the arbitration agreement towards the bankruptcy’s estate is that a creditor can, through its arbitration clause, utilize more from the bankruptcy’s estate property than the rest of the creditors, whom have not agreed on an arbitration clause. That the bankruptcy’s estate is considered forced to dispute in arbitration, even though the bankruptcy’s estate did not exist when the arbitration agreement occurred, implies that an impact between public- and civil law arises. The authors consider that the bankruptcy’s debtor arbitration clause should not be binding towards its bankruptcy’s estate. The authors is of the opinion that the case law conflicts concerning law of property and rights of association are more clear in their argument’s and development of the legal position should take guidance from these legal cases

    Evaluating expert‐based habitat suitability information of terrestrial mammals with GPS‐ tracking data

    No full text
    International audienceAimMacroecological studies that require habitat suitability data for many species often derive this information from expert opinion. However, expert-based information is inherently subjective and thus prone to errors. The increasing availability of GPS tracking data offers opportunities to evaluate and supplement expert-based information with detailed empirical evidence. Here, we compared expert-based habitat suitability information from the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with habitat suitability information derived from GPS-tracking data of 1,498 individuals from 49 mammal species.LocationWorldwide.Time period1998–2021.Major taxa studiedForty-nine terrestrial mammal species.MethodsUsing GPS data, we estimated two measures of habitat suitability for each individual animal: proportional habitat use (proportion of GPS locations within a habitat type), and selection ratio (habitat use relative to its availability). For each individual we then evaluated whether the GPS-based habitat suitability measures were in agreement with the IUCN data. To that end, we calculated the probability that the ranking of empirical habitat suitability measures was in agreement with IUCN's classification into suitable, marginal and unsuitable habitat types.ResultsIUCN habitat suitability data were in accordance with the GPS data (> 95% probability of agreement) for 33 out of 49 species based on proportional habitat use estimates and for 25 out of 49 species based on selection ratios. In addition, 37 and 34 species had a > 50% probability of agreement based on proportional habitat use and selection ratios, respectively.Main conclusionsWe show how GPS-tracking data can be used to evaluate IUCN habitat suitability data. Our findings indicate that for the majority of species included in this study, it is appropriate to use IUCN habitat suitability data in macroecological studies. Furthermore, we show that GPS-tracking data can be used to identify and prioritize species and habitat types for re-evaluation of IUCN habitat suitability data
    corecore