87 research outputs found

    DES Y3 + KiDS-1000: Consistent cosmology combining cosmic shear surveys

    Get PDF
    We present a joint cosmic shear analysis of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) and the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-1000) in a collaborative effort between the two survey teams. We find consistent cosmological parameter constraints between DES Y3 and KiDS-1000 which, when combined in a joint-survey analysis, constrain the parameter S8=σ8Ωm/0.3S_8 = \sigma_8 \sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} with a mean value of 0.7900.014+0.0180.790^{+0.018}_{-0.014}. The mean marginal is lower than the maximum a posteriori estimate, S8=0.801S_8=0.801, owing to skewness in the marginal distribution and projection effects in the multi-dimensional parameter space. Our results are consistent with S8S_8 constraints from observations of the cosmic microwave background by Planck, with agreement at the 1.7σ1.7\sigma level. We use a Hybrid analysis pipeline, defined from a mock survey study quantifying the impact of the different analysis choices originally adopted by each survey team. We review intrinsic alignment models, baryon feedback mitigation strategies, priors, samplers and models of the non-linear matter power spectrum.Comment: 38 pages, 21 figures, 15 tables, submitted to the Open Journal of Astrophysics. Watch the core team discuss this analysis at https://cosmologytalks.com/2023/05/26/des-kid

    Irbesartan in Marfan syndrome (AIMS): a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Irbesartan, a long acting selective angiotensin-1 receptor inhibitor, in Marfan syndrome might reduce aortic dilatation, which is associated with dissection and rupture. We aimed to determine the effects of irbesartan on the rate of aortic dilatation in children and adults with Marfan syndrome. METHODS: We did a placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised trial at 22 centres in the UK. Individuals aged 6-40 years with clinically confirmed Marfan syndrome were eligible for inclusion. Study participants were all given 75 mg open label irbesartan once daily, then randomly assigned to 150 mg of irbesartan (increased to 300 mg as tolerated) or matching placebo. Aortic diameter was measured by echocardiography at baseline and then annually. All images were analysed by a core laboratory blinded to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the rate of aortic root dilatation. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN90011794. FINDINGS: Between March 14, 2012, and May 1, 2015, 192 participants were recruited and randomly assigned to irbesartan (n=104) or placebo (n=88), and all were followed for up to 5 years. Median age at recruitment was 18 years (IQR 12-28), 99 (52%) were female, mean blood pressure was 110/65 mm Hg (SDs 16 and 12), and 108 (56%) were taking β blockers. Mean baseline aortic root diameter was 34·4 mm in the irbesartan group (SD 5·8) and placebo group (5·5). The mean rate of aortic root dilatation was 0·53 mm per year (95% CI 0·39 to 0·67) in the irbesartan group compared with 0·74 mm per year (0·60 to 0·89) in the placebo group, with a difference in means of -0·22 mm per year (-0·41 to -0·02, p=0·030). The rate of change in aortic Z score was also reduced by irbesartan (difference in means -0·10 per year, 95% CI -0·19 to -0·01, p=0·035). Irbesartan was well tolerated with no observed differences in rates of serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Irbesartan is associated with a reduction in the rate of aortic dilatation in children and young adults with Marfan syndrome and could reduce the incidence of aortic complications

    Influences de la sylviculture sur le risque de dégâts biotiques et abiotiques dans les peuplements forestiers

    Full text link

    Intoxicação por monofluoroacetato em animais

    Full text link

    Asymmetric Distortion Generation in a Variable Height Annulus

    No full text

    Comparative reasoning in constitutional litigation: functions, methods and selected case law of the German Federal Constitutional Court

    Get PDF
    The German Federal Constitutional Court: History, Jurisdiction and Composition.Structure and Style of the Judgments. Comparative Reasoning in Constitutional Litigation: Comparative Law as a “fifth” Method of Interpretation, numbers and statistics and selcted case law. The Affirmative Function of Foreign Case Law. The Dismissive or Distinguishing Function of Foreign Case Law. The Implicit or “hidden” Use of Comparative Reasoning. Questions of Methodology
    corecore