12 research outputs found
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Clinical Impact and Effectiveness of the Available Therapeutic Options
Abstract
Background: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) can affect the
quality of life of patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). Peritoneal disease control by medical therapies in these patients has been poorly
investigated Objectives: To describe, in a consecutive series
of GEP-NENs, the clinical impact of PC and to report the effectiveness of available treatments in PC control. Methods:
A retrospective, monocenter analysis was performed of 135
GEP-NENs (1993â2016) with at least a 12-month follow-up.
Peritoneal disease progression was defined as detection of a
significant increase in size or appearance of new implants by
imaging. Results: A total of 62.9% of cases had diffuse PC
(involving at least 2 abdominal quadrants). According to
WHO 2017 classification, cases were 42.3% neuroendocrine
tumors NET-G1, 45.5% NET-G2, 6.5% NET-G3, 4.9% neuroendocrine carcinomas NEC-G3, and 0.8% mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasms. Bowel obstruction
occurred in 30 (22.2%) patients mainly depending on size of
peritoneal implants (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02â1.20; p = 0.01).
Patients with diffuse PC treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) showed peritoneal progression in
37.5% of cases, and bowel obstruction or ascites in 28.1%.
Better peritoneal disease control was observed in cases receiving somatostatin analogs at first-line therapy, probably
due to a less aggressive disease behavior for these patients.
Conclusions: Bowel obstruction is not uncommon in GEPNENs with PC. PRRT should be adopted with caution in GEPNENs with diffuse PC, but larger series are needed to confirm
these data
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Clinical Impact and Effectiveness of the Available Therapeutic Options
Abstract
Background: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) can affect the
quality of life of patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). Peritoneal disease control by medical therapies in these patients has been poorly
investigated Objectives: To describe, in a consecutive series
of GEP-NENs, the clinical impact of PC and to report the effectiveness of available treatments in PC control. Methods:
A retrospective, monocenter analysis was performed of 135
GEP-NENs (1993â2016) with at least a 12-month follow-up.
Peritoneal disease progression was defined as detection of a
significant increase in size or appearance of new implants by
imaging. Results: A total of 62.9% of cases had diffuse PC
(involving at least 2 abdominal quadrants). According to
WHO 2017 classification, cases were 42.3% neuroendocrine
tumors NET-G1, 45.5% NET-G2, 6.5% NET-G3, 4.9% neuroendocrine carcinomas NEC-G3, and 0.8% mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasms. Bowel obstruction
occurred in 30 (22.2%) patients mainly depending on size of
peritoneal implants (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02â1.20; p = 0.01).
Patients with diffuse PC treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) showed peritoneal progression in
37.5% of cases, and bowel obstruction or ascites in 28.1%.
Better peritoneal disease control was observed in cases receiving somatostatin analogs at first-line therapy, probably
due to a less aggressive disease behavior for these patients.
Conclusions: Bowel obstruction is not uncommon in GEPNENs with PC. PRRT should be adopted with caution in GEPNENs with diffuse PC, but larger series are needed to confirm
these data
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Clinical Impact and Effectiveness of the Available Therapeutic Options
Abstract
Background: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) can affect the
quality of life of patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). Peritoneal disease control by medical therapies in these patients has been poorly
investigated Objectives: To describe, in a consecutive series
of GEP-NENs, the clinical impact of PC and to report the effectiveness of available treatments in PC control. Methods:
A retrospective, monocenter analysis was performed of 135
GEP-NENs (1993â2016) with at least a 12-month follow-up.
Peritoneal disease progression was defined as detection of a
significant increase in size or appearance of new implants by
imaging. Results: A total of 62.9% of cases had diffuse PC
(involving at least 2 abdominal quadrants). According to
WHO 2017 classification, cases were 42.3% neuroendocrine
tumors NET-G1, 45.5% NET-G2, 6.5% NET-G3, 4.9% neuroendocrine carcinomas NEC-G3, and 0.8% mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasms. Bowel obstruction
occurred in 30 (22.2%) patients mainly depending on size of
peritoneal implants (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02â1.20; p = 0.01).
Patients with diffuse PC treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) showed peritoneal progression in
37.5% of cases, and bowel obstruction or ascites in 28.1%.
Better peritoneal disease control was observed in cases receiving somatostatin analogs at first-line therapy, probably
due to a less aggressive disease behavior for these patients.
Conclusions: Bowel obstruction is not uncommon in GEPNENs with PC. PRRT should be adopted with caution in GEPNENs with diffuse PC, but larger series are needed to confirm
these data
Treatment of advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia, are we on the way to personalised medicine?
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (GEPNEN) comprises clinically as well as prognostically diverse tumour entities often diagnosed at late stage. Current classification provides a uniform terminology and a Ki67-based grading system, thereby facilitating management. Advances in the study of genomic and epigenetic landscapes have amplified knowledge of tumour biology and enhanced identification of prognostic and potentially predictive treatment subgroups. Translation of this genomic and mechanistic biology into advanced GEPNEN management is limited. 'Targeted' treatments such as somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radiotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors are treatment options but predictive tools are lacking. The inability to identify clonal heterogeneity and define critical oncoregulatory pathways prior to therapy, restrict therapeutic efficacy as does the inability to monitor disease status in real time. Chemotherapy in the poor prognosis NEN G3 group, though associated with acceptable response rates, only leads to short-term tumour control and their molecular biology requires delineation to provide new and more specific treatment options.The future requires an exploration of the NEN tumour genome, its microenvironment and an identification of critical oncologic checkpoints for precise drug targeting. In the advance to personalised medical treatment of patients with GEPNEN, clinical trials need to be based on mechanistic and multidimensional characterisation of each tumour in order to identify the therapeutic agent effective for the individual tumour.This review surveys advances in NEN research and delineates the current status of translation with a view to laying the basis for a genome-based personalised medicine management of advanced GEPNEN