GM-CSF, Flt3-L and IL-4 affect viability and function of conventional dendritic cell types 1 and 2

Conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1) and conventional type 2 dendritic cells (cDC2) have attracted increasing attention as alternatives to monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) in cancer immunotherapy. Use of cDCs for therapy has been hindered by their low numbers in peripheral blood. In the present study, we found that extensive spontaneous apoptosis and cDC death in culture within 24hrs represent an additional challenge. Different media conditions that maintain cDC viability and function were investigated. CD141+ cDC1 and CD1c+ cDC2 were isolated from healthy blood donor buffy coats. Low viabilities were found with CellGenix DC, RPMI-1640, and X-VIVO 15 standard culture media and with several supplements at 24hrs and 48hrs. Among multiple factors it was found that GM-CSF improved both cDC1 and cDC2 viability, whereas Flt3-L and IL-4 only increased viability of cDC1 and cDC2, respectively. Combinations of these three cytokines improved viability of both cDCs further, both at 24hrs and 48hrs time points. Although these cytokines have been extensively investigated for their role in myeloid cell differentiation, and are also used clinically, their effects on mature cDCs remain incompletely known, in particular effects on pro-inflammatory or tolerogenic cDC features. HLA-DR, CD80, CD83, CD86, PD-L1 and PD-L2 cDC membrane expressions were relatively little affected by GM-CSF, IL-4 and Flt3-L cytokine supplements compared to the strong induction following Toll-like receptor (TLR) stimulation for 24hrs. With minor exceptions the three cytokines appeared to be permissive to the TLR-induced marker expression. Allogeneic mixed leukocyte reaction showed that the cytokines promoted T-cell proliferation and revealed a potential to boost both Th1 and Th2 polarizing cytokines. GM-CSF and Flt3-L and their combination improved the capability of cDC1 for dextran uptake, while in cDC2, dextran capture was improved by GM-CSF. The data suggest that GM-CSF, IL-4 and Flt3-L and combinations might be beneficial for DC viability and function in vitro. Limited viability of cDCs could be a confounding variable experimentally and in immunotherapy.publishedVersio

The prognostic effect of KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung carcinoma revisited: A norwegian multicentre study

Background: due to emerging therapeutics targeting KRAS G12C and previous reports with conflicting results regarding the prognostic impact of KRAS and KRAS G12C in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we aimed to investigate the frequency of KRAS mutations and their associations with clinical characteristics and outcome. Since mutation subtypes have different preferences for downstream pathways, we also aimed to investigate whether there were differences in outcome according to mutation preference for the Raf, PI3K/Akt, or RalGDS/Ral pathways. Methods: retrospectively, clinicopathological data from 1233 stage I–IV non-squamous NSCLC patients with known KRAS status were reviewed. KRAS’ associations with clinical characteristics were analysed. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed for the following groups: KRAS wild type (wt) versus mutated, KRAS wt versus KRAS G12C versus KRAS non-G12C, among KRAS mutation subtypes and among mutation subtypes grouped according to preference for downstream pathways. Results: a total of 1117 patients were included; 38% had KRAS mutated tumours, 17% had G12C. Among KRAS mutated, G12C was the most frequent mutation in former/current smokers (45%) and G12D in never smokers (46%). There were no significant differences in survival according to KRAS status, G12C status, among KRAS mutation subtypes or mutation preference for downstream pathways. Conclusion: KRAS status or KRAS mutation subtype did not have any significant influence on PFS or OS

Mobile SARS‑CoV‑2 screening facilities for rapid deployment and university-based diagnostic laboratory

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has created a public crisis. Many medical and public institutions and businesses went into isolation in response to the pandemic. Because SARS-CoV-2 can spread irrespective of a patient's course of disease, these institutions’ continued operation or reopening based on the assessment and control of virus spread can be supported by targeted population screening. For this purpose, virus testing in the form of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis and antibody detection in blood can be central. Mobile SARS-CoV-2 screening facilities with a built-in biosafety level (BSL)-2 laboratory were set up to allow the testing offer to be brought close to the subject group's workplace. University staff members, their expertise, and already available equipment were used to implement and operate the screening facilities and a certified diagnostic laboratory. This operation also included specimen collection, transport, PCR and antibody analysis, and informing subjects as well as public health departments. Screening facilities were established at different locations such as educational institutions, nursing homes, and companies providing critical supply chains for health care. Less than 4 weeks after the first imposed lockdown in Germany, a first mobile testing station was established featuring a build-in laboratory with two similar stations commencing operation until June 2020. During the 15-month project period, approximately 33,000 PCR tests and close to 7000 antibody detection tests were collected and analyzed. The presented approach describes the required procedures that enabled the screening facilities and laboratories to collect and process several hundred specimens each day under difficult conditions. This report can assist others in establishing similar setups for pandemic scenarios