Capacity Characterized by a Medium Cut

n/

Hemodialysis with Polymethylmethacrylate Restores the Response to Hepatitis B Vaccination in Chronic Dialysis Patients: Hypothesized Mechanism of Action

Patients undergoing hemodialysis often present with a reduced response to anti-hepatitis B virus (anti-HBV) vaccination. The soluble form of CD40 (sCD40) is elevated in hemodialysis patients and this has been shown to correlate with lack of response to anti-HBV vaccination. Due to its high molecular weight, conventional dialyzers cannot clear sCD40. Previous studies have demonstrated, that dialysis membranes in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) can reduce the levels of sCD40. We have studied the effect of dialysis with PMMA membranes in patients who were non-responders to anti-HBV vaccination after&nbsp; a&nbsp; complete&nbsp; cycle&nbsp; of&nbsp; vaccinations.&nbsp; Interestingly,&nbsp; we&nbsp; found&nbsp; that&nbsp; significantly&nbsp; more&nbsp; patients&nbsp; in&nbsp; the PMMA group were able to mount a response to vaccination, compared to the control group (P = 0.04).</p

Dosing Penalty of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents after Switching from Originator to Biosimilar Preparations in Stable Hemodialysis Patients

To the Editor: The efficacy of ESA biosimilars has been tested mainly in the few studies needed for marketing authorization,1-5 whereas data from individual self-reported clinical experience are lacking. Such information, together with pharmacovigilance data, is key to obtaining reassurance regarding the safety of these products. Of note, 2 studies of efficacy when switching from originator to biosimilar in hemodialysis patients have reported a dosing penalty (ie, requiring higher doses to maintain Hb level) of 4% to 13% for HX575 (epoetin alfa; Binocrit) and 10% to 15% for SB309 (epoetin zeta; Retacrit). 4,5 Dosing penalty for biosimilars is relevant not only for cost reasons, but also when considering the significant association of higher ESA dose with adverse outcomes.6 All manufacturers recommend using the lowest effective dose for correcting anemia

Effectiveness of Switch to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA) Biosimilars versus Maintenance of ESA Originators in the Real-Life Setting: Matched-Control Study in Hemodialysis Patients

Background: In hemodialysis (HD), switching from erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) originators to biosimilars is associated with the need for doses approximately 10% higher, according to industry-driven studies. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy on anemia control of switching from ESA originators to biosimilars in daily clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively selected consecutive HD patients receiving stable intravenous ESA doses, and who had not been transfused in the previous 6 months, from 12 non-profit Italian centers. Patients switched from originators to biosimilars (n = 163) were matched with those maintained on ESA originators (n = 163) using a propensity score approach. The study duration was 24 weeks, and the primary endpoint was the mean dose difference (MDD), defined as the difference between the switch and control groups of ESA dose changes during the study (time-weighted average ESA dose minus baseline ESA dose). Results: Age (70 ± 13 years), male sex (63%), diabetes (29%), history of cardiovascular disease (40%), body weight (68 ± 14 kg), vascular access (86% arteriovenous fistula), hemoglobin [Hb] (11.2 ± 0.9 g/dL) and ESA dose (8504 ± 6370 IU/week) were similar in the two groups. Hb remained unchanged during the study in both groups. Conversely, ESA dose remained unchanged in the control group and progressively increased in the switch group from week 8 to 24. The time-weighted average of the ESA dose was higher in the switch group than in the control group (10,503 ± 7389 vs. 7981 ± 5858 IU/week; p = 0.001), leading to a significant MDD of 2423 IU/week (95% confidence interval [CI] 1615â\u80\u933321), corresponding to a 39.6% (95% CI 24.7â\u80\u9354.6) higher dose of biosimilars compared with originators. The time-weighted average of Hb was 0.2 g/dL lower in the switch group, with a more frequent ESA hyporesponsiveness (14.7 vs. 2.5%). Iron parameters and other resistance factors remained unchanged. Conclusions: In stable dialysis patients, switching from ESA originators to biosimilars requires 40% higher doses to maintain anemia control