Tumour size over 3 cm predicts poor short-term outcomes after major liver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. By the HC-AFC-2009 group.

INTRODUCTION: As mortality and morbidity after a curative resection remains high, it is essential to identify pre-operative factors associated with an early death after a major resection. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2008, we selected a population of 331 patients having undergone a major hepatectomy including segment I with a lymphadenectomy and a common bile duct resection for a proven hilar cholangiocarcinoma in 21 tertiary centres. The study's objective was to identify pre-operative predictors of early death (<12 months) after a resection. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 221 men and 110 women, with a median age of 61 years (range: 24-85). The post-operative mortality and morbidity rates were 8.2% and 61%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 85%, 64% and 53%, respectively. The median tumour size was 23 mm on pathology, ranging from 8 to 40. A tumour size >30 mm [odds ratio (OR) 2.471 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.136-7.339), P = 0.001] and major post-operative complication [OR 3.369 (95% CI 1.038-10.938), P = 0.004] were independently associated with death <12 months in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The present analysis of a series of 331 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma showed that tumour size >30 mm was independently associated with death <12 months

Treatment of HCC with claudin-1-specific antibodies suppresses carcinogenic signaling and reprograms the tumor microenvironment

Background &amp; aims: Despite recent approvals, the response to treatment and prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain poor. Claudin-1 (CLDN1) is a membrane protein that is expressed at tight junctions, but it can also be exposed non-junctionally, such as on the basolateral membrane of the human hepatocyte. While CLDN1 within tight junctions is well characterized, the role of non-junctional CLDN1 and its role as a therapeutic target in HCC remains unexplored. Methods: Using humanized monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specifically targeting the extracellular loop of human non-junctional CLDN1 and a large series of patient-derived cell-based and animal model systems we aimed to investigate the role of CLDN1 as a therapeutic target for HCC. Results: Targeting non-junctional CLDN1 markedly suppressed tumor growth and invasion in cell line-based models of HCC and patient-derived 3D ex vivo models. Moreover, the robust effect on tumor growth was confirmed in vivo in a large series of cell line-derived xenograft and patient-derived xenograft mouse models. Mechanistic studies, including single-cell RNA sequencing of multicellular patient HCC tumorspheres, suggested that CLDN1 regulates tumor stemness, metabolism, oncogenic signaling and perturbs the tumor immune microenvironment. Conclusions: Our results provide the rationale for targeting CLDN1 in HCC and pave the way for the clinical development of CLDN1-specific mAbs for the treatment of advanced HCC. Impact and implications: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with high mortality and unsatisfactory treatment options. Herein, we identified the cell surface protein Claudin-1 as a treatment target for advanced HCC. Monoclonal antibodies targeting Claudin-1 inhibit tumor growth in patient-derived ex vivo and in vivo models by modulating signaling, cell stemness and the tumor immune microenvironment. Given the differentiated mechanism of action, the identification of Claudin-1 as a novel therapeutic target for HCC provides an opportunity to break the plateau of limited treatment response. The results of this preclinical study pave the way for the clinical development of Claudin-1-specific antibodies for the treatment of advanced HCC. It is therefore of key impact for physicians, scientists and drug developers in the field of liver cancer and gastrointestinal oncology.</p

Treatment of HCC with claudin-1-specific antibodies suppresses carcinogenic signaling and reprograms the tumor microenvironment

Background & aims: Despite recent approvals, the response to treatment and prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain poor. Claudin-1 (CLDN1) is a membrane protein that is expressed at tight junctions, but it can also be exposed non-junctionally, such as on the basolateral membrane of the human hepatocyte. While CLDN1 within tight junctions is well characterized, the role of non-junctional CLDN1 and its role as a therapeutic target in HCC remains unexplored.Methods: Using humanized monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specifically targeting the extracellular loop of human non-junctional CLDN1 and a large series of patient-derived cell-based and animal model systems we aimed to investigate the role of CLDN1 as a therapeutic target for HCC.Results: Targeting non-junctional CLDN1 markedly suppressed tumor growth and invasion in cell line-based models of HCC and patient-derived 3D ex vivo models. Moreover, the robust effect on tumor growth was confirmed in vivo in a large series of cell line-derived xenograft and patient-derived xenograft mouse models. Mechanistic studies, including single-cell RNA sequencing of multicellular patient HCC tumorspheres, suggested that CLDN1 regulates tumor stemness, metabolism, oncogenic signaling and perturbs the tumor immune microenvironment.Conclusions: Our results provide the rationale for targeting CLDN1 in HCC and pave the way for the clinical development of CLDN1-specific mAbs for the treatment of advanced HCC.Impact and implications: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with high mortality and unsatisfactory treatment options. Herein, we identified the cell surface protein Claudin-1 as a treatment target for advanced HCC. Monoclonal antibodies targeting Claudin-1 inhibit tumor growth in patient-derived ex vivo and in vivo models by modulating signaling, cell stemness and the tumor immune microenvironment. Given the differentiated mechanism of action, the identification of Claudin-1 as a novel therapeutic target for HCC provides an opportunity to break the plateau of limited treatment response. The results of this preclinical study pave the way for the clinical development of Claudin-1-specific antibodies for the treatment of advanced HCC. It is therefore of key impact for physicians, scientists and drug developers in the field of liver cancer and gastrointestinal oncology

Assessment of Factors Associated with Morbidity and Textbook Outcomes of Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Obese Patients. A French Nationwide Study

BACKGROUND: Liver surgeons need to know the expected outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in obese patients.OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study is to assess morbidity, mortality and textbook outcomes (TO) after LLR in obese patients.METHODS: This is a French multicenter study of patients undergoing LLR between 1996 and 2018. Obesity was defined by a BMI at or above 30 kg/m(2). Short-term outcomes and TO were compared between obese (ob) and nonobese (non-ob) patients. Factors associated with severe morbidity and TO were investigated.RESULTS: Of 3,154 patients included, 616 (19.5%) were obese. Ob-group patients had significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and higher incidence of metabolic syndrome and chronic liver disease and were less likely to undergo major hepatectomy. Mortality rates were similar between ob and non-ob groups (0.8 vs 1.1%; p = 0.66). Overall morbidity and hospital stay were significantly increased in the ob group compared with the non-ob group (39.4 vs 34.7%, p = 0.03; and 9.5 vs 8.6 days, p = 0.02), whereas severe 90-day morbidity (at or above Clavien-Dindo grade III) was similar between groups (8% in both groups; p = 0.90). TO rate was significantly lower for the ob group than the non-ob group (58.3 vs 63.7%; p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, obesity did not emerge as a risk factor for severe 90-day morbidity but was associated with a lower TO rate after LLR (odds ratio = 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-1.0; p = 0.03).CONCLUSIONS: LLR in obese patients is safe and effective with acceptable mortality and morbidity. Obesity had no impact on severe morbidity but was a factor for failing to achieve TO after LLR. (C) 2022 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved

Benchmark performance of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy and right hepatectomy in expert centers

International audienceHerein, we aimed to establish benchmark values - based on a composite indicator of healthcare quality - for the performance of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) and laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) using data from expert centers

Impact of cirrhosis in patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection in a nationwide multicentre survey

BACKGROUND: The aim was to analyse the impact of cirrhosis on short-term outcomes after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in a multicentre national cohort study. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients undergoing LLR in 27 centres between 2000 and 2017. Cirrhosis was defined as F4 fibrosis on pathological examination. Short-term outcomes of patients with and without liver cirrhosis were compared after propensity score matching by centre volume, demographic and tumour characteristics, and extent of resection. RESULTS: Among 3150 patients included, LLR was performed in 774 patients with (24·6 per cent) and 2376 (75·4 per cent) without cirrhosis. Severe complication and mortality rates in patients with cirrhosis were 10·6 and 2·6 per cent respectively. Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) developed in 3·6 per cent of patients with cirrhosis and was the major cause of death (11 of 20 patients). After matching, patients with cirrhosis tended to have higher rates of severe complications (odds ratio (OR) 1·74, 95 per cent c.i. 0·92 to 3·41; P = 0·096) and PHLF (OR 7·13, 0·91 to 323·10; P = 0·068) than those without cirrhosis. They also had a higher risk of death (OR 5·13, 1·08 to 48·61; P = 0·039). Rates of cardiorespiratory complications (P = 0·338), bile leakage (P = 0·286) and reoperation (P = 0·352) were similar in the two groups. Patients with cirrhosis had a longer hospital stay than those without (11 versus 8 days; P = 0·018). Centre expertise was an independent protective factor against PHLF in patients with cirrhosis (OR 0·33, 0·14 to 0·76; P = 0·010). CONCLUSION: Underlying cirrhosis remains an independent risk factor for impaired outcomes in patients undergoing LLR, even in expert centres

Comparing indications, complexity and outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection between centers with and without a liver transplant program: a French nationwide study

International audienceBackground: There are no data to evaluate the difference in populations and impact of centers with liver transplant programs in performing laparoscopic liver resection (LLR).Methods: This was a multicenter study including patients undergoing LLR for benign and malignant tumors at 27 French centers from 1996 to 2018. The main outcomes were postoperative severe morbidity and mortality.Results: A total of 3154 patients were included, and 14 centers were classified as transplant centers (N = 2167 patients, 68.7 %). The transplant centers performed more difficult LLRs and more resections for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients who more frequently had cirrhosis. A higher rate of performing the Pringle maneuver, a lower rate of blood loss and a higher rate of open conversion (all p < 0.05) were observed in the transplant centers. There was no association between the presence of a liver transplant program and either postoperative severe morbidity (<10 % in each group; p = 0.228) or mortality (1 % in each group; p = 0.915).Conclusions: Most HCCs, difficult LLRs, and cirrhotic patients are treated in transplant centers. We show that all centers can achieve comparable safety and quality of care in LLR independent of the presence of a liver transplant program