BMJ Open

OBJECTIVES: To describe (i) the trend in oral anticoagulant (OAC) use following the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients and (ii) the current patterns of use of NOAC therapy in new users with AF in France. DESIGN: (i) Repeated cross-sectional study and (ii) population-based cohort study. SETTING: French national healthcare databases (50 million beneficiaries). PARTICIPANTS: (i) Patients with identified AF in 2011, 2013 and 2016 and (ii) patients with AF initiating OAC therapy in 2015-2016. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: (i) Trend in OAC therapy use in patients with AF and (ii) patterns of use of NOAC therapy in new users with AF. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2016, use of OAC therapy moderately increased (+16%), while use of antiplatelet therapy decreased (-22%) among all patients with identified AF. In 2016, among the 1.1 million AF patients, 66% used OAC therapy and were more likely to be treated by vitamin K antagonist (VKA) than NOAC therapy, including patients at higher risk of stroke (63.5%), while 33% used antiplatelet therapy. Among 192 851 new users of OAC therapy in 2015-2016 with identified AF, NOAC therapy (66.3%) was initiated more frequently than VKA therapy, including in patients at higher risk of stroke (57.8%). Reduced doses were prescribed in 40% of NOAC new users. Several situations of inappropriate use at NOAC initiation were identified, including concomitant use of drugs increasing the risk of bleeding (one in three new users) and potential NOAC underdosing. CONCLUSIONS: OAC therapy use in patients with AF remains suboptimal 4 years after the introduction of NOACs for stroke prevention in France and improvement in appropriate prescribing regarding NOAC initiation is needed. However, NOAC therapy is now the preferred drug class for initiation of OAC therapy in patients with AF, including in patients at higher risk of stroke

Stroke risk and NSAIDs: A systematic review of observational studies

Aims: To perform a quantitative systematic review of observational studies on the risk of stroke associated with the use of individual NSAIDs. Methods and results: Searches were conducted using the Medline database within PubMed (1990-2008). Observational cohort or case-control studies were eligible if reported on the risk of cardiovascular events associated with individual NSAIDs versus the nonuse of NSAIDs. We found 3193 articles, in which 75 were eligible for review and abstraction. Of the 75 articles, 6 reported relative risk (RR) of stroke. Data were abstracted into a database using a standardized entry form. Two authors assessed study quality, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. The pooled RR of all subtypes of incident stroke was increased with the current use of rofecoxib (RR=1.64, 95% CI=1.15-2.33) and diclofenac (RR=1.27, 95% CI=1.08-1.48). The pooled estimates for naproxen, ibuprofen, and celecoxib were close to unity. The risk of ischemic stroke was also increased with rofecoxib (RR=1.82, 95% CI=1.09-3.04) and diclofenac (RR=1.20, 95% CI=0.99-1.45). Data were inadequate to estimate the pooled RR by dose and duration, for other individual NSAIDs or nonischemic stroke subtypes. Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports an increased risk of ischemic stroke with the current use of rofecoxib and diclofenac. Additional studies are required to evaluate most individual NSAIDS, the effect of dose and duration, and the subtypes of stroke

The Contribution of National Spontaneous Reporting Systems to Detect Signals of Torsadogenicity: Issues Emerging from the ARITMO Project

Introduction: Spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs) are pivotal for signal detection, especially for rare events with a high drug-attributable component, such as torsade de pointes (TdP). Use of different national SRSs is rarely attempted because of inherent difficulties, but should be considered on the assumption that rare events are diluted in international databases. Objective: The aim was to describe TdP-related events associated with antipsychotics, H1-antihistamines and anti-infectives in three national SRSs (in Italy, Germany and France) and highlight potential signals of torsadogenicity through a combined literature evaluation. Methods: A common search strategy was applied to extract TdP-related events: (1) TdP, (2) QT interval abnormalities, (3) ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia, and (4) sudden cardiac death. Signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) were calculated for TdP + QT interval abnormalities and defined by a lower limit of the 95 % confidence interval of the reporting odds ratio (ROR) >1. Among SDRs with at least three cases without concomitant pro-arrhythmic drugs, we defined potential new signal of torsadogenicity as drugs with no published evidence from (a) the crediblemeds® website (http://www.crediblemeds.com, as of November 1st, 2014); (b) studies on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS); and (c) safety trials or pharmaco-epidemiological studies (as of December 16th, 2014). Results: Overall, 3505 cases were retrieved (1372, 1468, and 801 for France, Germany and Italy, respectively). Antipsychotics were mainly recorded in Germany (792 cases), whereas antibiotics peaked at 515 and 491 (France and Italy, respectively). Forty-one drugs met criteria for SDRs in at least one single source, of which 31 were detected only from one single SRS: 18, ten and three (French, German and Italian SRS, respectively). By contrast, only five SDRs were detected in all national data sources (amisulpride, aripiprazole, haloperidol, olanzapine, risperidone). Overall, five potential new signals of torsadogenicity were identified: flupentixol, ganciclovir, levocetirizine, oxatomide and tiapride. Conclusions: We found differences across and within national SRSs in the reporting of drug-induced TdP, which finally resulted in five potential new signals of torsadogenicity. These findings warrant targeted pharmacovigilance studies to formally assess the existence of actual drug–event associations

Therapie

Pharmacoepidemiology is the study of interactions between drugs and human populations, investigating, in real conditions of life, benefits, risks and use of drugs. Pharmacoepidemiology applies to drugs and their pharmacological evaluations, the different methods also used in epidemiology to assess in real conditions of life, benefits, risks and use of drugs. Pharmacoepidemiologic studies are ad-hoc studies or studies on databases. Specific methods exist to measure drug exposure, as well as indicators of compliance and misuse of drugs. Various designs for descriptive and explanatory studies exist, in a context in which a growing proportion of studies are carried out using medico-administrative data. The limits traditionally affecting the study designs are modified in this context, almost any design selected for the conduct of a study from these databases then deriving from a cohort in whom the information has been recorded prospectively and exhaustively

: Drug Saf

International audienceIntroduction Qualitative approaches based on drug causality assessment estimate the causal link between a drug and the occurrence of an adverse event from individual case safety reports. Quantitative approaches based on disproportionality analyses were developed subsequently to allow automated statistical signal detection from pharmacovigilance databases. This study assessed the potential value of causality assessment for automated safety signal detection. Methods All drug–serious adverse event pairs with a positive rechallenge and a semiology suggestive of drug causality were identified in the French pharmacovigilance database (BNPV) from 2011 to 2017. The results were compared with those obtained from automated disproportionality analyses of the BNPV/World Health Organization (WHO) VigiBase®, complemented by the list of signals validated by the WHO-UMC (Uppsala Monitoring Centre). Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPCs), Martindale®, Meyler’s® and MedLINE® were used as other sources of information for the purpose of comparison. Results Of the 155 pairs of interest, 115 (74.2%) were also identified by another source of information. Since the individual case reporting in the BNPV, 23 (14.8%) of the adverse events (AEs) have been added to the SmPC, seven of which were not identified by disproportionality. Finally, 40 pairs were not identified by any other source of information, 13 of which were considered as potential new safety signals after analysis of case reports by pharmacovigilance experts. The signals identified by causality assessment involved antineoplastic and immunomodulatory drugs especially, in comparison with signals identified by WHO-UMC or by disproportionality within the BNPV. Conclusion The approach therefore appears useful as an additional tool for safety signal detection, especially for antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci

Benzodiazepines and z-drugs are primarily indicated for the treatment of sleep disorders and anxiety symptoms. Their frequent long-term use contrasts with the international guidelines that limit treatment duration to a maximum of 4 weeks. The objective of this study was to assess the frequency of their use that was not in accordance with guidelines in the French general population between 2007 and 2012 and associated characteristics. A cohort of 67,550 benzodiazepine new users was set up in an exhaustive database for health-care reimbursements and representative of the French population. Benzodiazepine use not in accordance with guidelines was defined as the concomitant dispensation of several benzodiazepines, the dispensation of treatment over a period longer than recommended, or a new dispensing within the 2 months following the end of a previous treatment of maximum recommended duration, considering that French recommendations distinguish between hypnotic (4 weeks) and anxiolytic benzodiazepines (12 weeks). Benzodiazepine use not in accordance with guidelines was high, in about 30% of new hypnotic users and 20% of new anxiolytic users. Its frequency was stable over the study period. Associated characteristics were similar for new hypnotic or anxiolytic users, i.e.. older age, treatment initiation by a psychiatrist, presence of a chronic disease, hospitalization, or another psychotropic treatment. These findings provide a solid basis for establishing a public health policy to reduce benzodiazepine use not compliant with guidelines. They should be further explored in patients most at risk in the present study, e.g., patients treated by a psychiatrist

Br J Clin Pharmacol

INTRODUCTION: In 2017, concerns regarding Adverse Events (AEs) associated with levonorgestrel Intra-Uterine Device Mirena(R) were largely echoed in medias in France. This resulted in a tremendous reporting of AEs to Pharmacovigilance Centres. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the reporting of AEs regarding Mirena(R) in France and to study the impact of media coverage on this reporting. METHODS: All cases reports involving Mirena(R) recorded in the French national pharmacovigilance database from marketing (21/07/1995) until 04/08/2017 were extracted. To allow studying the influence of mediatisation, reports were described separately for the periods preceding and following the observed media coverage peak (15/05/2017). RESULTS: Overall, 3,224 reports were considered, 510 (15.8%) recorded before the media coverage peak, and 2,714 (84.2%) after. Before the peak, 76.5% of reports originated from health professionals; median time-to-report was of 5.5 months (IQR: 1.7-18.6), and median number of AEs per report of 1 (min-max: 1-17). After the peak, 98.6% originated from patients; median time-to-report was 21 months (IQR: 8.1-45.5), and median number of AEs per report was 6 (min-max: 1-37). After the peak, most reports mentioned anxio-depressive disorders (38.8% vs 10.6% before) or sexual disorders (47.3% vs 6.9%). Other emphasized AEs were weight increase (42.3% vs 10.2%) and pain (gastrointestinal, 19.1% vs 3.5%; musculoskeletal, 22.2% vs 4.5%). CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the importance of mediatisation impact on spontaneous reporting with changes concerning amounts of reports, type of reporter, and type of reported AEs. For Mirena(R), this led to generate signals regarding anxio-depressive and sexual disorders

Comparative effectiveness of recommended versus less intensive drug combinations in secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome

Purpose: The secondary prevention treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is based on the combined use of drugs from four therapeutic classes (beta-blockers, antiplatelet agents, statins, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers). The objective of this study was to compare the long-term effectiveness of the recommended therapeutic combination with those of incomplete combinations in secondary prevention of ACS. Methods: This cohort study used data from a representative sample of the French national healthcare insurance system database. Patients hospitalised for an incident ACS between 2006 and 2011 and aged ≥20 years at the time of ACS were included in the study. Effectiveness in preventing the composite outcome ACS, transient ischemic attack, ischemic stroke or all-cause-death was estimated using time-fixed and time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models with different definitions of exposure (at inclusion or determined daily during follow-up) and adjustment for patient characteristics, co-morbidities and co-medications. Results: Of the 2874 patients included in the study, 33.9% were women; median age was 67 years (interquartile range: 56–77). The median duration of follow-up was 3.6 years (interquartile range: 2.2–5.3). Compared with the use of recommended combination, use of combination with three classes increased the risk of the composite outcome from 1.25 (95% confidence interval (95%CI), [1.07–1.47]) in the time-fixed model and from 1.40 (95%CI, [1.15–1.70]) or 1.42 (95%CI, [1.13–1.79]) in the time-dependent models. Conclusions: After ACS, the use of incomplete drugs combinations compared with the recommended four drugs combination was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality

Heart

OBJECTIVE: A prolonged QTc (LQT) is a surrogate for the risk of torsade de pointes (TdP). QTc interval duration is influenced by sex hormones: oestradiol prolongs and testosterone shortens QTc. Drugs used in the treatment of breast cancer have divergent effects on hormonal status. METHODS: We performed a disproportionality analysis using the European database of suspected adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports to evaluate the reporting OR (ROR chi(2)) of LQT, TdP and ventricular arrhythmias associated with selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs: tamoxifen and toremifene) as opposed to aromatase inhibitors (AIs: anastrozole, exemestane and letrozole). When the proportion of an ADR is greater in patients exposed to a drug (SERMs) compared with patients exposed to control drug (AIs), this suggests an association between the specific drug and the reaction and is a potential signal for safety. Clinical and demographic characterisation of patients with SERMs-induced LQT and ventricular arrhythmias was performed. RESULTS: SERMs were associated with higher proportion of LQT reports versus AIs (26/8318 vs 11/14851, ROR: 4.2 (2.11-8.55), p<0.001). SERMs were also associated with higher proportion of TdP and ventricular arrhythmia reports versus AIs (6/8318 vs 2/14851, ROR: 5.4 (1.29-26.15), p:0.02; 16/8318 vs 12/14851, ROR: 2.38 (1.15-4.94), p:0.02, respectively). Mortality was 38% in patients presenting ventricular arrhythmias associated with SERMs. CONCLUSIONS: SERMs are associated with more reports of drug-induced LQT, TdP and ventricular arrhythmias compared with AIs. This finding is consistent with oestradiol-like properties of SERMs on the heart as opposed to effects of oestrogen deprivation and testosterone increase induced by AIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03259711