36 research outputs found

    Expansion des familles de gÚnes impliquées dans des maladies par duplication du génome chez les premiers vertébrés

    Get PDF
    The emergence and evolutionary expansion of gene families implicated in cancers and other severegenetic diseases is an evolutionary oddity from a natural selection perspective. In this thesis, wehave shown that gene families prone to deleterious mutations in the human genome have beenpreferentially expanded by the retention of "ohnolog" genes from two rounds of whole‐genomeduplication (WGD) dating back from the onset of jawed vertebrates. Using advanced inferenceanalysis, we have further demonstrated that the retention of many ohnologs suspected to be dosagebalanced is in fact indirectly mediated by their susceptibility to deleterious mutations. This enhancedretention of "dangerous" ohnologs, defined as prone to autosomal‐dominant deleterious mutations,is shown to be a consequence of WGD‐induced speciation and the ensuing purifying selection inpost‐WGD species. We have also developed a statistical approach to identify ohnologs in vertebrategenomes with high confidence. These ohnologs can be easily accessed from a web server. Ourfindings highlight the importance of WGD‐induced non‐adaptive selection for the emergence ofvertebrate complexity, while rationalizing, from an evolutionary perspective, the expansion of genefamilies frequently implicated in genetic disorders and cancers. The high confidence ohnologsidentified by our approach will also pave the way for novel functional genomic analysesdistinguishing gene duplicates according to their origin.L'expansion au cours de l'Ă©volution de familles de gĂšnes impliquĂ©es dans les cancers et d'autresmaladies gĂ©nĂ©tiques graves est surprenante du point de vue de la sĂ©lection naturelle. Dans cettethĂšse, nous avons montrĂ© que des familles de gĂšnes sujettes Ă  des mutations dĂ©lĂ©tĂšres dans legĂ©nome humain se sont principalement agrandies par rĂ©tention de gĂšnes "ohnologues" issus dedeux duplications globales du gĂ©nome (GGD) datant de l'origine des vertĂ©brĂ©s Ă  mĂąchoires. Enutilisant une mĂ©thode d'infĂ©rence avancĂ©e, nous avons aussi dĂ©montrĂ© que la rĂ©tention denombreux ohnologues soupçonnĂ©s d'ĂȘtre susceptibles aux Ă©quilibres de dosage d'expression Ă©tait enfait plus directement liĂ©e Ă  leur sensibilitĂ© aux mutations dĂ©lĂ©tĂšres. Cette rĂ©tention priviligiĂ©ed'ohnologues "dangereux", dĂ©finis comme sujets Ă  des mutations dĂ©lĂ©tĂšres dominantes, semble ĂȘtreune consĂ©quence des Ă©vĂȘnements de spĂ©ciation provoquĂ©s par ces GGD et la sĂ©lection depurification qui a suivi dans les espĂšces post‐GGD. Nous avons Ă©galement dĂ©veloppĂ© une approchequantitative pour identifier les ohnologues dans le gĂ©nome des vertĂ©brĂ©s. Ces ohnologues sontfacilement accessibles Ă  partir d'un serveur Web. Nos rĂ©sultats soulignent l' importance de lasĂ©lection non adaptative induite par GGD dans l'Ă©mergence de la complexitĂ© des vertĂ©brĂ©s, tout enrationalisant, d'un point de vue Ă©volutif, l'extension des familles de gĂšnes frĂ©quemment impliquĂ©esdans les maladies gĂ©nĂ©tiques et les cancers. Les ohnologues identifiĂ©s par notre approche ouvrentĂ©galement la voie Ă  de nouvelles analyses de gĂ©nomique fonctionnelle distinguant l'origine desgĂšnes dupliquĂ©s

    Identification of Ohnolog Genes Originating from Whole Genome Duplication in Early Vertebrates, Based on Synteny Comparison across Multiple Genomes

    No full text
    International audienceWhole genome duplications (WGD) have now been firmly established in all major eukary-otic kingdoms. In particular, all vertebrates descend from two rounds of WGDs, that occurred in their jawless ancestor some 500 MY ago. Paralogs retained from WGD, also coined 'ohnologs' after Susumu Ohno, have been shown to be typically associated with development, signaling and gene regulation. Ohnologs, which amount to about 20 to 35% of genes in the human genome, have also been shown to be prone to dominant deleterious mutations and frequently implicated in cancer and genetic diseases. Hence, identifying ohnologs is central to better understand the evolution of vertebrates and their susceptibility to genetic diseases. Early computational analyses to identify vertebrate ohnologs relied on content-based synteny comparisons between the human genome and a single invertebrate outgroup genome or within the human genome itself. These approaches are thus limited by lineage specific rearrangements in individual genomes. We report, in this study, the identification of vertebrate ohnologs based on the quantitative assessment and integration of syn-teny conservation between six amniote vertebrates and six invertebrate outgroups. Such a synteny comparison across multiple genomes is shown to enhance the statistical power of ohnolog identification in vertebrates compared to earlier approaches, by overcoming line-age specific genome rearrangements. Ohnolog gene families can be browsed and down-loaded for three statistical confidence levels or recompiled for specific, user-defined, significance criteria at http://ohnologs.curie.fr/. In the light of the importance of WGD on the genetic makeup of vertebrates, our analysis provides a useful resource for researchers interested in gaining further insights on vertebrate evolution and genetic diseases

    On the retention of gene duplicates prone to dominant deleterious mutations

    No full text
    Recent studies have shown that gene families from different functional categories have been preferentially expanded either by small scale duplication (SSD) or by whole-genome duplication (WGD). In particular, gene families prone to dominant deleterious mutations and implicated in cancers and other genetic diseases in human have been greatly expanded through two rounds of WGD dating back from early vertebrates. Here, we strengthen this intriguing observation, showing that human oncogenes involved in different primary tumors have retained many WGD duplicates compared to other human genes. In order to rationalize this evolutionary outcome, we propose a consistent population genetics model to analyze the retention of SSD and WGD duplicates taking into account their propensity to acquire dominant deleterious mutations. We solve a deterministic haploid model including initial duplicated loci, their retention through sub-functionalization or their neutral loss-of-function or deleterious gain-of-function at one locus. Extensions to diploid genotypes are presented and population size effects are analyzed using stochastic simulations. The only difference between the SSD and WGD scenarios is the initial number of individuals with duplicated loci. While SSD duplicates need to spread through the entire population from a single individual to reach fixation, WGD duplicates are de facto fixed in the small initial post-WGD population arising through the ploidy incompatibility between post-WGD individuals and the rest of the pre-WGD population. WGD duplicates prone to dominant deleterious mutations are then shown to be indirectly selected through purifying selection in post-WGD species, whereas SSD duplicates typically require positive selection. These results highlight the long-term evolution mechanisms behind the surprising accumulation of WGD duplicates prone to dominant deleterious mutations and are shown to be consistent with cancer genome data on the prevalence of human oncogenes with WGD duplicates

    Evolution after WGD and identification of ohnologs.

    No full text
    <p>Evolution after WGD and identification of ohnologs using content-based synteny comparison. The genomes of three lineages sharing a common ancestor are shown. Orthologs and paralogs have been depicted by the same color. The WGD lineage (A) underwent whole genome duplication (B) followed by non-functionalization (C) and genome rearrangements (D) leading to the current intragenomic content-based synteny (I). By contrast, the two outgroup genomes without WGD (E, G) experienced lineage specific genome rearrangements (F, H) leading to 1-to-2 content-based synteny pattern with the WGD lineage (J, K). Note, that some ohnolog pairs (D) are only identified by one of the two outgroups (J or K) due to lineage specific rearrangements.</p

    Venn diagram of the distribution of amniote ohnologs.

    No full text
    <p>A six-way Venn diagram showing the distribution in percentages of the ohnologs identified in at least one amniote and predicted from the relaxed criteria. 36.6% of ohnologs are found in all six amniotes. Each shaded sectors in red contributes to more than 2% of all consensus ohnologs in amniotes (numbers of ohnologs are given in <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004394#pcbi.1004394.s011" target="_blank">S10 Fig</a>).</p

    Venn diagram of distribution of human ohnologs with respect to outgroups.

    No full text
    <p>A six-way Venn diagram showing the distribution in percentages of the 7,715 of the total 8,178 human ohnolog pairs that are identified by at least one outgroup and predicted from the relaxed criteria. Only 3.8% of human ohnolog pairs are identified by all outgroup. Each of the shaded sectors in green contributes to more than 2% of all ohnolog pairs (numbers of ohnolog pairs are given in <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004394#pcbi.1004394.s009" target="_blank">S8 Fig</a>).</p
    corecore