HFR1 Is Crucial for Transcriptome Regulation in the Cryptochrome 1-Mediated Early Response to Blue Light in Arabidopsis thaliana

Cryptochromes are blue light photoreceptors involved in development and circadian clock regulation. They are found in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes as light sensors. Long Hypocotyl in Far-Red 1 (HFR1) has been identified as a positive regulator and a possible transcription factor in both blue and far-red light signaling in plants. However, the gene targets that are regulated by HFR1 in cryptochrome 1 (cry1)-mediated blue light signaling have not been globally addressed. We examined the transcriptome profiles in a cry1- and HFR1-dependent manner in response to 1 hour of blue light. Strikingly, more than 70% of the genes induced by blue light in an HFR1-dependent manner were dependent on cry1, and vice versa. High overrepresentation of W-boxes and OCS elements were found in these genes, indicating that this strong cry1 and HFR1 co-regulation on gene expression is possibly through these two cis-elements. We also found that cry1 was required for maintaining the HFR1 protein level in blue light, and that the HFR1 protein level is strongly correlated with the global gene expression pattern. In summary, HFR1, which is fine-tuned by cry1, is crucial for regulating global gene expression in cry1-mediated early blue light signaling, especially for the function of genes containing W-boxes and OCS elements

PIF Genes Mediate the Effect of Sucrose on Seedling Growth Dynamics

As photoautotrophs, plants can use both the form and amount of fixed carbon as a measure of the light environment. In this study, we used a variety of approaches to elucidate the role of exogenous sucrose in modifying seedling growth dynamics. In addition to its known effects on germination, high-resolution temporal analysis revealed that sucrose could extend the number of days plants exhibited rapid hypocotyl elongation, leading to dramatic increases in ultimate seedling height. In addition, sucrose changed the timing of daily growth maxima, demonstrating that diel growth dynamics are more plastic than previously suspected. Sucrose-dependent growth promotion required function of multiple phytochrome-interacting factors (PIFs), and overexpression of PIF5 led to growth dynamics similar to plants exposed to sucrose. Consistent with this result, sucrose was found to increase levels of PIF5 protein. PIFs have well-established roles as integrators of response to light levels, time of day and phytohormone signaling. Our findings strongly suggest that carbon availability can modify the known photomorphogenetic signaling network

Comparison of bacterial microbiota of the predatory mite Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and its factitious prey Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Acari: Acaridae)

Neoseiulus cucumeris is a predatory mite used for biological control of arthropod pests. Mass-reared predators are fed with factitious prey mites such as Tyrophagus putrescentiae. Although some information on certain endosymbionts of N. cucumeris and T. putrescentiae exists, it is unclear whether both species share bacterial communities. The bacterial communities in populations of predator and prey mites, as well as the occurence of potential acaropathogenic bacteria were analyzed. The comparisons were based on the following groups: (i) N. cucumeris mass-production; (ii) N. cucumeris laboratory population with disease symptoms; (iii) T. putrescentiae pure populations and; (iv) T. putrescentiae from rearing units of N. cucumeris. Only 15% of OTUs were present in all samples from predatory and prey mite populations (core OTUs): the intracellular symbionts Wolbachia, Cardinium, plus other Blattabacterium-like, Solitalea-like, and Bartonella-like symbionts. Environmental bacteria were more abundant in predatory mites, while symbiotic bacteria prevailed in prey mites. Relative numbers of certain bacterial taxa were significantly different between the microbiota of prey mites reared with and without N. cucumeris. No significant differences were found in the bacterial communities of healthy N. cucumeris compared to N. cucumeris showing disease symptoms. We did not identify any confirmed acaropathogenic bacteria among microbiota

Residues Clustered in the Light-Sensing Knot of Phytochrome B are Necessary for Conformer-Specific Binding to Signaling Partner PIF3

The bHLH transcription factor, PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 3 (PIF3), interacts specifically with the photoactivated, Pfr, form of Arabidopsis phytochrome B (phyB). This interaction induces PIF3 phosphorylation and degradation in vivo and modulates phyB-mediated seedling deetiolation in response to red light. To identify missense mutations in the phyB N-terminal domain that disrupt this interaction, we developed a yeast reverse-hybrid screen. Fifteen individual mutations identified in this screen, or in previous genetic screens for Arabidopsis mutants showing reduced sensitivity to red light, were shown to also disrupt light-induced binding of phyB to PIF3 in in vitro co-immunoprecipitation assays. These phyB missense mutants fall into two general classes: Class I (eleven mutants) containing those defective in light signal perception, due to aberrant chromophore attachment or photoconversion, and Class II (four mutants) containing those normal in signal perception, but defective in the capacity to transduce this signal to PIF3. By generating a homology model for the three-dimensional structure of the Arabidopsis phyB chromophore-binding region, based on the crystal structure of Deinococcus radiodurans phytochrome, we predict that three of the four Class II mutated phyB residues are solvent exposed in a cleft between the presumptive PAS and GAF domains. This deduction suggests that these residues could be directly required for the physical interaction of phyB with PIF3. Because these three residues are also necessary for phyB-imposed inhibition of hypocotyl elongation in response to red light, they are functionally necessary for signal transfer from photoactivated phyB, not only to PIF3 and other related bHLH transcription factors tested here, but also to other downstream signaling components involved in regulating seedling deetiolation

FHY1 Mediates Nuclear Import of the Light-Activated Phytochrome A Photoreceptor

The phytochrome (phy) family of photoreceptors is of crucial importance throughout the life cycle of higher plants. Light-induced nuclear import is required for most phytochrome responses. Nuclear accumulation of phyA is dependent on two related proteins called FHY1 (Far-red elongated HYpocotyl 1) and FHL (FHY1 Like), with FHY1 playing the predominant function. The transcription of FHY1 and FHL are controlled by FHY3 (Far-red elongated HYpocotyl 3) and FAR1 (FAr-red impaired Response 1), a related pair of transcription factors, which thus indirectly control phyA nuclear accumulation. FHY1 and FHL preferentially interact with the light-activated form of phyA, but the mechanism by which they enable photoreceptor accumulation in the nucleus remains unsolved. Sequence comparison of numerous FHY1-related proteins indicates that only the NLS located at the N-terminus and the phyA-interaction domain located at the C-terminus are conserved. We demonstrate that these two parts of FHY1 are sufficient for FHY1 function. phyA nuclear accumulation is inhibited in the presence of high levels of FHY1 variants unable to enter the nucleus. Furthermore, nuclear accumulation of phyA becomes light- and FHY1-independent when an NLS sequence is fused to phyA, strongly suggesting that FHY1 mediates nuclear import of light-activated phyA. In accordance with this idea, FHY1 and FHY3 become functionally dispensable in seedlings expressing a constitutively nuclear version of phyA. Our data suggest that the mechanism uncovered in Arabidopsis is conserved in higher plants. Moreover, this mechanism allows us to propose a model explaining why phyA needs a specific nuclear import pathway

Arabidopsis COP1 shapes the temporal pattern of CO accumulation conferring a photoperiodic flowering response

The transcriptional regulator CONSTANS (CO) promotes flowering of Arabidopsis under long summer days (LDs) but not under short winter days (SDs). Post-translational regulation of CO is crucial for this response by stabilizing the protein at the end of a LD, whereas promoting its degradation throughout the night under LD and SD. We show that mutations in CONSTITUTIVE PHOTOMORPHOGENIC 1 (COP1), a component of a ubiquitin ligase, cause extreme early flowering under SDs, and that this is largely dependent on CO activity. Furthermore, transcription of the CO target gene FT is increased in cop1 mutants and decreased in plants overexpressing COP1 in phloem companion cells. COP1 and CO interact in vivo and in vitro through the C-terminal region of CO. COP1 promotes CO degradation mainly in the dark, so that in cop1 mutants CO protein but not CO mRNA abundance is dramatically increased during the night. However, in the morning CO degradation occurs independently of COP1 by a phytochrome B-dependent mechanism. Thus, COP1 contributes to day length perception by reducing the abundance of CO during the night and thereby delaying flowering under SDs

Light Plays an Essential Role in Intracellular Distribution of Auxin Efflux Carrier PIN2 in Arabidopsis thaliana

BACKGROUND: Light plays a key role in multiple plant developmental processes. It has been shown that root development is modulated by shoot-localized light signaling and requires shoot-derived transport of the plant hormone, auxin. However, the mechanism by which light regulates root development is not largely understood. In plants, the endogenous auxin, indole-3-acetic acid, is directionally transported by plasma-membrane (PM)-localized auxin influx and efflux carriers in transporting cells. Remarkably, the auxin efflux carrier PIN proteins exhibit asymmetric PM localization, determining the polarity of auxin transport. Similar to PM-resident receptors and transporters in animal and yeast cells, PIN proteins undergo constitutive cycling between the PM and endosomal compartments. Auxin plays multiple roles in PIN protein intracellular trafficking, inhibiting PIN2 endocytosis at some concentrations and promoting PIN2 degradation at others. However, how PIN proteins are turned over in plant cells is yet to be addressed. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: Using laser confocal scanning microscopy, and physiological and molecular genetic approaches, here, we show that in dark-grown seedlings, the PM localization of auxin efflux carrier PIN2 was largely reduced, and, in addition, PIN2 signal was detected in vacuolar compartments. This is in contrast to light-grown seedlings where PIN2 was predominantly PM-localized. In light-grown plants after shift to dark or to continuous red or far-red light, PIN2 also accumulated in vacuolar compartments. We show that PIN2 vacuolar targeting was derived from the PM via endocytic trafficking and inhibited by HY5-dependent light signaling. In addition, the ubiquitin 26S proteasome is involved in the process, since its inhibition by mutations in COP9 and a proteasome inhibitor MG132 impaired the process. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Collectively, our data indicate that light plays an essential role in PIN2 intracellular trafficking, promoting PM-localization in the presence of light and, on the other hand, vacuolar targeting for protein degradation in the absence of light. Based on these results, we postulate that light regulation of root development is mediated at least in part by changes in the intracellular distribution of auxin efflux carriers, PIN proteins, in response to the light environment

Arabidopsis cell expansion is controlled by a photothermal switch

In Arabidopsis, the seedling hypocotyl has emerged as an exemplar model system to study light and temperature control of cell expansion. Light sensitivity of this organ is epitomized in the fluence rate response where suppression of hypocotyl elongation increases incrementally with light intensity. This finely calibrated response is controlled by the photoreceptor, phytochrome B, through the deactivation and proteolytic destruction of phytochrome-interacting factors (PIFs). Here we show that this classical light response is strictly temperature dependent: a shift in temperature induces a dramatic reversal of response from inhibition to promotion of hypocotyl elongation by light. Applying an integrated experimental and mathematical modelling approach, we show how light and temperature coaction in the circuitry drives a molecular switch in PIF activity and control of cell expansion. This work provides a paradigm to understand the importance of signal convergence in evoking different or non-intuitive alterations in molecular signalling

Nitric oxide triggers a transient metabolic reprogramming in Arabidopsis

[EN] Nitric oxide (NO) regulates plant growth and development as well as responses to stress that enhanced its endogenous production. Arabidopsis plants exposed to a pulse of exogenous NO gas were used for untargeted global metabolomic analyses thus allowing the identification of metabolic processes affected by NO. At early time points after treatment, NO scavenged superoxide anion and induced the nitration and the S-nitrosylation of proteins. These events preceded an extensive though transient metabolic reprogramming at 6 h after NO treatment, which included enhanced levels of polyamines, lipid catabolism and accumulation of phospholipids, chlorophyll breakdown, protein and nucleic acid turnover and increased content of sugars. Accordingly, lipid-related structures such as root cell membranes and leaf cuticle altered their permeability upon NO treatment. Besides, NO-treated plants displayed degradation of starch granules, which is consistent with the increased sugar content observed in the metabolomic survey. The metabolic profile was restored to baseline levels at 24 h post-treatment, thus pointing up the plasticity of plant metabolism in response to nitroxidative stress conditions.This work was supported by grants BIO2011-27526 and BIO2014-56067-P from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and FEDER funds. We thank support and comments from Danny Alexander (Metabolon Inc., USA) on metabolomic analyses.Leon Ramos, J.; Costa-Broseta, Á.; Castillo López Del Toro, MC. (2016). Nitric oxide triggers a transient metabolic reprogramming in Arabidopsis. Scientific Reports. 6:1-14. doi:10.1038/srep37945S1146Arc, E., Galland, M., Godin, B., Cueff, G. & Rajjou, L. Nitric oxide implication in the control of seed dormancy and germination. Front. Plant Sci. 4, 346 (2013).Beligni, M. V. & Lamattina, L. Nitric oxide stimulates seed germination and de-etiolation, and inhibits hypocotyl elongation, three light-inducible responses in plants. Planta 210, 215–221 (2000).Lozano-Juste, J. & León, J. Nitric oxide regulates DELLA content and PIF expression to promote photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 156, 1410–1123 (2011).He, Y. et al. Nitric oxide represses the Arabidopsis floral transition. Science 305, 1968–1971 (2004).Tsai, Y. C., Delk, N. A., Chowdhury, N. I. & Braam, J. Arabidopsis potential calcium sensors regulate nitric oxide levels and the transition to flowering. Plant Signal. Behav. 2, 446–454 (2007).Manjunatha, G., Lokesh, V. & Neelwarne, B. Nitric oxide in fruit ripening: trends and opportunities. Biotechnol. Adv. 28, 489–499 (2010).Liu, F. & Guo, F. Q. Nitric oxide deficiency accelerates chlorophyll breakdown and stability loss of thylakoid membranes during dark-induced leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. PLoS One 8(2), e56345 (2013).Du, J. et al. Nitric oxide induces cotyledon senescence involving co-operation of the NES1/MAD1 and EIN2-associated ORE1 signalling pathways in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 4051–4063 (2014).Siddiqui, M. H., Al-Whaibi, M. H. & Basalah, M. O. Role of nitric oxide in tolerance of plants to abiotic stress. Protoplasma 248, 447–455 (2011).Arasimowicz-Jelonek, M. & Floryszak-Wieczorek, J. Nitric oxide: an effective weapon of the plant or the pathogen? Mol. Plant Pathol. 15, 406–416 (2014).Thomas, D. D. Breathing new life into nitric oxide signaling: A brief overview of the interplay between oxygen and nitric oxide. Redox Biol. 5, 225–33 (2015).Groβ, F., Durner, J. & Gaupels, F. Nitric oxide, antioxidants and prooxidants in plant defence responses. Front. Plant Sci. 4, 419 (2013).Astier, J. & Lindermayr, C. Nitric oxide-dependent posttranslational modification in plants: an update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13, 15193–15208 (2012).Hess, D. T. & Stamler, J. S. Regulation by S-nitrosylation of protein post-translational modification. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 4411–4418 (2012).Guerra, D. D. & Callis, J. Ubiquitin on the move: the ubiquitin modification system plays diverse roles in the regulation of endoplasmic reticulum- and plasma membrane-localized proteins. Plant Physiol. 160, 56–64 (2012).Skalska, K., Miller, J. S. & Ledakowicz, S. Trends in NO(x) abatement: a review. Sci. Total Environ. 408, 3976–3989 (2010).Pilegaard, K. Processes regulating nitric oxide emissions from soils. Phil. Transac. Royal Soc. London. Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 368, 20130126 (2013).Jaegle, L., Steinberger, L., Martin, R. V. & Chance, K. Global partitioning of NOx sources using satellite observations: Relative roles of fossil fuel combustion, biomass burning and soil emissions. Faraday Discus. 130, 407–423 (2005).Gupta, K. J., Fernie, A. R., Kaiser, W. M. & van Dongen, J. T. On the origins of nitric oxide. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 160–168 (2011).Mur, L. A. et al. Nitric oxide in plants: an assessment of the current state of knowledge. AoB Plants 5, pls052 (2013).Correa-Aragunde, N., Foresi, N. & Lamattina, L. Nitric oxide is a ubiquitous signal for maintaining redox balance in plant cells: regulation of ascorbate peroxidase as a case study. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 2913–2921 (2015).Noctor, G., Lelarge-Trouverie, C. & Mhamdi, A. The metabolomics of oxidative stress. Phytochemistry 112, 33–53 (2015).Allan, W. L., Simpson, J. P., Clark, S. M. & Shelp, B. J. Gamma-hydroxybutyrate accumulation in Arabidopsis and tobacco plants is a general response to abiotic stress: putative regulation by redox balance and glyoxylate reductase isoforms. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 2555–2564 (2008).Romero, L. C., Aroca, M. Á., Laureano-Marín, A. M., Moreno, I., García, I. & Gotor, C. Cysteine and cysteine-related signaling pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant 7, 264–276 (2014).Noctor, G. et al. Glutathione in plants: an integrated overview. Plant Cell Environ. 35, 454–484 (2012).Feussner, I. & Wasternack, C. The lipoxygenase pathway. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 53, 275–297 (2002).Green, M. A. & Fry, S. C. Vitamin C degradation in plant cells via enzymatic hydrolysis of 4-O-oxalyl-L-threonate. Nature 433, 83–87 (2005).Szarka, A., Tomasskovics, B. & Bánhegyi, G. The ascorbate-glutathione-α-tocopherol triad in abiotic stress response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13, 4458–4483 (2012).Hurlock, A. K., Roston, R. L., Wang, K. & Benning, C. Lipid trafficking in plant cells. Traffic 15, 915–932 (2014).Blokhina, O., Virolainen, E. & Fagerstedt, K. V. Antioxidants, oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress: a review. Ann. Bot. 91, 179–194 (2003).Yeats, T. H. & Rose, J. K. The formation and function of plant cuticles. Plant Physiol. 163, 5–20 (2013).Lozano-Juste, J. & León, J. Enhanced abscisic acid-mediated responses in nia1nia2noa1-2 triple mutant impaired in NIA/NR- and AtNOA1-dependent nitric oxide biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 152, 891–903 (2010).Hörtensteiner, S. Update on the biochemistry of chlorophyll breakdown. Plant Mol Biol. 82, 505–17 (2013).Pruzinská, A. et al. Chlorophyll breakdown in senescent Arabidopsis leaves: characterization of chlorophyll catabolites and of chlorophyll catabolic enzymes involved in the degreening reaction. Plant Physiol. 139, 52–63 (2005).Hirashima, M., Tanaka, R. & Tanaka, A. Light-independent cell death induced by accumulation of pheophorbide a in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 50, 719–29 (2009).Zottini, M., Costa, A., De Michele, R., Ruzzene, M., Carimi, F. & Lo Schiavo, F. Salicylic acid activates nitric oxide synthesis in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 58, 1397–1405 (2007).Mainz, E. R. et al. Monitoring intracellular nitric oxide production using microchip electrophoresis and laser-induced fluorescence detection. Analytical Methods 4, 414–420 (2012).Vandelle, E. & Delledonne, M. Peroxynitrite formation and function in plants. Plant Sci. 181, 534–539 (2011).Minocha, R., Majumdar, R. & Minocha, S. C. Polyamines and abiotic stress in plants: a complex relationship. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 175 (2014).Parsons H. T., Yasmin, T. & Fry, S. C. Alternative pathways of dehydroascorbic acid degradation in vitro and in plant cell cultures: novel insights into vitamin C catabolism. Biochem. J. 440, 375–383 (2011).Hou, Q., Ufer, G. & Bartels, D. Lipid signalling in plant responses to abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 39, 1029–4108 (2016).Zhou, X. R., Callahan, D. L., Shrestha, P., Liu, Q., Petrie, J. R. & Singh, S. P. Lipidomic analysis of Arabidopsis seed genetically engineered to contain DHA. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 41 (2014).Pohl, C. H. & Kock, J. L. Oxidized fatty acids as inter-kingdom signaling molecules. Molecules 19, 1273–1285 (2014).Araújo, W. L., Tohge, T., Ishizaki, K., Leaver, C. J. & Fernie, A. R. Protein degradation-an alternative respiratory substrate for stressed plants. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 489–498 (2011).Sakamoto, W. & Takami, T. Nucleases in higher plants and their possible involvement in DNA degradation during leaf senescence. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 3835–3843 (2014).Del Duca, S., Serafini-Fracassini, D. & Cai, G. Senescence and programmed cell death in plants: polyamine action mediated by transglutaminase. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 120 (2014).Franco, M. C. & Estévez, A. G. Tyrosine nitration as mediator of cell death. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 3939–3950 (2014).Palumbo, A., Fiore, G., Di Cristo, C., Di Cosmo, A. & d’Ischia, M. NMDA receptor stimulation induces temporary alpha-tubulin degradation signalled by nitric oxide-mediated tyrosine nitration in the nervous system of Sepia officinalis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 293, 1536–1543 (2002).Wang, Y. Y., Lin, S. Y., Chuang, Y. H., Mao, C. H., Tung, K. C. & Sheu, W. H. Protein nitration is associated with increased proteolysis in skeletal muscle of bile duct ligation-induced cirrhotic rats. Metabolism 59, 468–472 (2010).Castillo, M. C., Lozano-Juste, J., González-Guzmán, M., Rodriguez, L., Rodriguez, P. L. & León, J. Inactivation of PYR/PYL/RCAR ABA receptors by tyrosine nitration may enable rapid inhibition of ABA signaling by nitric oxide in plants. Sci. Signal. 8(392), ra89 (2015).Blaise, G. A., Gauvin, D., Gangal, M. & Authier, S. Nitric oxide, cell signaling and cell death. Toxicology 208, 177–192 (2005).Brüne, B. Nitric oxide: NO apoptosis or turning it ON? Cell Death Differ. 10, 864–869 (2003).Wang, Y., Chen, C., Loake, G. J. & Chu, C. Nitric oxide: promoter or suppressor of programmed cell death? Prot. Cell 1, 133–142 (2010).Serrano, I., Romero-Puertas, M. C., Sandalio, L. M. & Olmedilla, A. The role of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide in programmed cell death associated with self-incompatibility. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 2869–2876 (2015).Huang, S., Hill, R. D. & Stasolla, C. Plant hemoglobin participation in cell fate determination. Plant Signal. Behavior 9, e29485 (2014).Maes, M. B., Scharpé, S. & De Meester, I. Dipeptidyl peptidase II (DPPII), a review. Clin. Chim. Acta 380, 31–49 (2007).Gibbs, D. J. et al. Nitric oxide sensing in plants is mediated by proteolytic control of group VII ERF transcription factors. Mol. Cell 53, 369–379 (2014).Kitamura, K. Inhibition of the Arg/N-end rule pathway-mediated proteolysis by dipeptide-mimetic molecules. Amino Acids 48, 235–243 (2016).Duek, P. D., Elmer, M. V., van Oosten, V. R. & Fankhauser C. The degradation of HFR1, a putative bHLH class transcription factor involved in light signaling, is regulated by phosphorylation and requires COP1. Curr Biol. 14, 2296–2301 (2004)

Gene Ontology Consortium: going forward

The Gene Ontology (GO; http://www.geneontology.org) is a community-based bioinformatics resource that supplies information about gene product function using ontologies to represent biological knowledge. Here we describe improvements and expansions to several branches of the ontology, as well as updates that have allowed us to more efficiently disseminate the GO and capture feedback from the research community. The Gene Ontology Consortium (GOC) has expanded areas of the ontology such as cilia-related terms, cell-cycle terms and multicellular organism processes. We have also implemented new tools for generating ontology terms based on a set of logical rules making use of templates, and we have made efforts to increase our use of logical definitions. The GOC has a new and improved web site summarizing new developments and documentation, serving as a portal to GO data. Users can perform GO enrichment analysis, and search the GO for terms, annotations to gene products, and associated metadata across multiple species using the all-new AmiGO 2 browser. We encourage and welcome the input of the research community in all biological areas in our continued effort to improve the Gene Ontology