Notulae to the Italian flora of algae, bryophytes, fungi and lichens: 5

In this contribution, new data concerning bryophytes, fungi, and lichens of the Italian flora are presented. It includes new records and confirmations for the bryophyte genera Diplophyllum and Ptychostomum, the fungal genera Arrhenia, Gymnosporangium, and Sporidesmium and the lichen genera Arthonia, Coenogonium, Flavoplaca, Gyalolechia, Parmotrema, Peltigera, Pterygiopsis, Squamarina, Tornabea, and Waynea

Qualita' di vita in residenze per anziani231Guida alle osservazioni quotidiane

Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Biblioteca Centrale, P.le Aldo Moro, 7, ROMA (Italia) / CNR - Consiglio Nazionale delle RichercheSIGLEITItal

Riproducibilità ed accuratezza nelle diagnosi di CIN in 15 laboratori italiani: progetto pilota nazionale. Messa a punto di nuovi indici clinici di variabilità diagnostica : Gruppo Nazionale di lavoro per il controllo di qualità esterno in Citopatologia cervico-vaginale

OBJECTIVES: To assess reliability and accuracy of cervical smear diagnoses, to evaluate the effectiveness of the participation in a programme of slide exchange in increasing reliability and to re-examine the agreement in discriminating between CIN 2 and CIN 3 (merged in High grade SIL in the Bethesda System). SETTING: 15 laboratories participating on a voluntary basis throughout Italy, for a period of 1 year. METHOD: Phase one: circulation of 40 slides including all main diagnostic categories; discussion of results by representatives of participating centres. Phase two: circulation of another 40 similar slides. For each slide, not only a diagnosis but also recommendations for further examinations and a judgment on diagnostic difficulty were asked. Common measures of reliability and accuracy and (the latter only for slides on which a consensus diagnosis was reached corresponding to the histological diagnosis) were calculated; three new indices of diagnostic variability were also computed. RESULTS: Consensus diagnosis among representatives of participating laboratories on about 90% of the slides was reached both in the first and in the second phase. On 3 slides it was impossible to reach a consensus diagnosis even among external referees. In both phases, the study showed a marked variability among diagnoses, recommendations and judgment on diagnostic difficulty and, on some slides, a worrying lack of reliability in the determination of precancerous lesions. The agreement on discrimination between CIN 1 and CIN 2 was low, but it was slightly better between CIN 2 and CIN 3. No significant relationship between accuracy and workload was found. External quality control or better said, continuous quality improvement activities are essential but should be conducted in a more systematic way with greater involvement of cytotechnicians

Reliability and accuracy of reporting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in 15 laboratories throughout Italy: phase 1 of a national programme of external quality control in cervical screening

This paper reports results of a first phase of a pilot study to assess and improve quality of diagnoses in cervical cytological laboratories located throughout Italy. It represents the first phase of an External Quality Assurance programme (EQA). In the first phase, two sets of cervical smears representing a range of diagnoses were circulated among participating laboratories. Responses were recorded on a standardized form. Participants were asked to assess the adequacy of the smear and formulate a diagnosis. They were also asked to recommend management of the patient on the basis of the smear report and judge the degree of diagnostic difficulty of each slide. Crude index of agreement, unweighted and weighted kappas, diagnostic specific kappas, sensitivity and specificity as well as clinical indices of variability were calculated. In the second phase, two additional sets of slides were circulated after discussion of the first phase. There was striking variability between laboratories, both in terms of diagnoses offered and recommendations for management on individual slides. Assessment of the degree of difficulty of each slide was also very variable. Discrimination between CINII and CINIII was poor, confirming the choice of merging these two categories in the Bethesda classification. However, discrimination between CINI and CINII was also unsatisfactory. The results were discussed in workshops and it was possible to reach a consensus diagnosis in 35 of 40 smears. This study confirms the need for external quality control programmes