7 research outputs found
Lysozyme enhances the bactericidal effect of BP100 peptide against Erwinia amylovora, the causal agent of fire blight of rosaceous plants
Dual Action of BPC194:A Membrane Active Peptide Killing Bacterial Cells
<p>Membrane active peptides can perturb the lipid bilayer in several ways, such as poration and fusion of the target cell membrane, and thereby efficiently kill bacterial cells. We probe here the mechanistic basis of membrane poration and fusion caused by membrane-active, antimicrobial peptides. We show that the cyclic antimicrobial peptide, BPC194, inhibits growth of Gram-negative bacteria and ruptures the outer and inner membrane at the onset of killing, suggesting that not just poration is taking place at the cell envelope. To simplify the system and to better understand the mechanism of action, we performed Forster resonance energy transfer and cryogenic transmission electron microscopy studies in model membranes and show that the BPC194 causes fusion of vesicles. The fusogenic action is accompanied by leakage as probed by dual-color fluorescence burst analysis at a single liposome level. Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations reveal how the peptides are able to simultaneously perturb the membrane towards porated and fused states. We show that the cyclic antimicrobial peptides trigger both fusion and pore formation and that such large membrane perturbations have a similar mechanistic basis.</p>
Disaccharides impact the lateral organization of lipid membranes
Disaccharides are well-known for their membrane protective ability. Interaction between sugars and multicomponent membranes, however, remains largely unexplored. Here, we combine molecular dynamics simulations and fluorescence microscopy to study the effect of mono- and disaccharides on membranes that phase separate into Lo and Ld domains. We find that nonreducing disaccharides, sucrose and trehalose, strongly destabilize the phase separation leading to uniformly mixed membranes as opposed to monosaccharides and reducing disaccharides. To unveil the driving force for this process, simulations were performed in which the sugar linkage was artificially modified. The availability of accessible interfacial binding sites that can accommodate the nonreducing disaccharides is key for their strong impact on lateral membrane organization. These exclusive interactions between the nonreducing sugars and the membranes may rationalize why organisms such as yeasts, tardigrades, nematodes, bacteria, and plants accumulate sucrose and trehalose, offering cell protection under anhydrobiotic conditions. The proposed mechanism might prove to be a more generic way by which surface bound agents could affect membranes
Membrane protein structure, function, and dynamics: a perspective from experiments and theory
Membrane proteins mediate processes that are fundamental for the flourishing of biological cells. Membrane-embedded transporters move ions and larger solutes across membranes; receptors mediate communication between the cell and its environment and membrane-embedded enzymes catalyze chemical reactions. Understanding these mechanisms of action requires knowledge of how the proteins couple to their fluid, hydrated lipid membrane environment. We present here current studies in computational and experimental membrane protein biophysics, and show how they address outstanding challenges in understanding the complex environmental effects on the structure, function, and dynamics of membrane proteins.JTD, IA, and MR used the computational resources of the Modeling Facility of the Department of Chemistry, University of California Irvine funded by NSF Grant CHE-0840513 for this work. A-NB was supported in part by the Marie Curie International Reintegration Award IRG-26920.TWA was supported by ARC DP120103548, NSF MCB1052477, DE Shaw Anton (PSCA00061P; NRBSC, through NIH RC2GM093307), VLSCI (VR0200), and NCI (dd7). BA and SV acknowledge the support by ERC advanced Grant No. 268888. ZC and PG would like to acknowledge Reference Framework (NSRF) 2011–2013, National Action ‘‘Cooperation,’’ under grant entitled ‘‘Magnetic Nanoparticles for targeted MRI therapy (NANOTHER),’’ with code ‘‘11RYM-1-1799.’’ The program is cofunded by the European Regional Development Fund and national resources. Part of the calculations presented herein were performed using resources of the LinkSCEEM-2 project, funded by the EC under FP7 through Capacities Research Infrastructure, INFRA-2010-1.2.3 Virtual Research Communities, Combination of Collaborative Project and Coordination and Support Actions (CPCSA) under Grant agreement no. RI-261600. GB was supported in part by NSF grant MCB1330728 from the National Science Foundation and Grant PO1GM55876-14A1 from the National Institutes of Health. LD received funding from EU FP7 (PIOF-GA-2012-329534). LD, and MLK used the computational resources of Temple University, supported by the National Science Foundation through major research instrumentation grant number CNS-09-58854. JS acknowledges support from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III FEDER (CP12/03139