Brief Report: Severe Pneumonitis After Combined Thoracic Radiotherapy and Osimertinib.

IntroductionOsimertinib is an effective treatment for metastatic NSCLC. Occasionally, thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) is delivered to patients receiving osimertinib to treat residual or progressing pulmonary tumors. Anecdotal reports suggest that the delivery of TRT in combination with osimertinib may be associated with a high risk of severe pneumonitis.MethodsA retrospective study was performed at a single academic medical center in the United States to investigate the incidence of severe pneumonitis among patients treated with combined TRT and osimertinib between June 2016 and December 2021. Baseline patient characteristics, tumor size and location, and dosimetric parameters were evaluated. The highest grade of radiation pneumonitis that developed within 6 months of treatment was scored in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.ResultsA total of 16 patients were identified who were treated with combined TRT and osimertinib. All had a diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC. Treatment-related grade greater than or equal to 2 pneumonitis developed in 56%, grade greater than or equal to 3 in 37.5%, and grade 4 in 6.3%; no patient developed grade 5 pneumonitis. Median time to any-grade pneumonitis was 29 days (1-84 d); all patients had symptom resolution with expectant management or oral steroid therapies. All patients discovered to have grade greater than or equal to 3 pneumonitis (n = 6) received TRT to tumors located within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree, including tumors abutting the proximal bronchial tree (n = 2) and within the mediastinum (n = 1).ConclusionsThe combination of TRT with osimertinib was associated with a high rate of severe pneumonitis that required oral steroid medications. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and to understand the clinical and treatment factors that influence this risk and how they can be mitigated

Brief Report: Severe Pneumonitis After Combined Thoracic Radiotherapy and Osimertinib

Introduction: Osimertinib is an effective treatment for metastatic NSCLC. Occasionally, thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) is delivered to patients receiving osimertinib to treat residual or progressing pulmonary tumors. Anecdotal reports suggest that the delivery of TRT in combination with osimertinib may be associated with a high risk of severe pneumonitis. Methods: A retrospective study was performed at a single academic medical center in the United States to investigate the incidence of severe pneumonitis among patients treated with combined TRT and osimertinib between June 2016 and December 2021. Baseline patient characteristics, tumor size and location, and dosimetric parameters were evaluated. The highest grade of radiation pneumonitis that developed within 6 months of treatment was scored in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Results: A total of 16 patients were identified who were treated with combined TRT and osimertinib. All had a diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC. Treatment-related grade greater than or equal to 2 pneumonitis developed in 56%, grade greater than or equal to 3 in 37.5%, and grade 4 in 6.3%; no patient developed grade 5 pneumonitis. Median time to any-grade pneumonitis was 29 days (1–84 d); all patients had symptom resolution with expectant management or oral steroid therapies. All patients discovered to have grade greater than or equal to 3 pneumonitis (n = 6) received TRT to tumors located within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree, including tumors abutting the proximal bronchial tree (n = 2) and within the mediastinum (n = 1). Conclusions: The combination of TRT with osimertinib was associated with a high rate of severe pneumonitis that required oral steroid medications. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and to understand the clinical and treatment factors that influence this risk and how they can be mitigated

Immune checkpoint inhibitor induced thyroid dysfunction is a frequent event post-treatment in NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: Thyroid dysfunction is the most frequent endocrine immune related adverse event (irAE) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), typically arising 3-6 months into immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, but arising after ICI cessation, in some cases. Due to limited post-treatment adverse event reporting requirements on ICI trials, the incidence of ICI-induced thyroid dysfunction arising after therapy is unclear. We investigated ICI-induced thyroid dysfunction in a cohort of 294 NSCLC patients, with a specific focus on the post-treatment setting. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of ICI-induced thyroid dysfunction (clinically acted upon or laboratory only) was performed in 294 UCLA NSCLC patients treated 2012-2018. Clinically acted upon thyroid dysfunction was defined as thyroid diagnosis documentation and/or thyroid medication administration. Laboratory only dysfunction was defined as abnormal thyroid labs in the absence of clinical action. Timing of thyroid dysfunction relative to ICI treatment and thyroid monitoring patterns were also assessed. RESULTS: 82% (241/294) of ICI treated NSCLC patients had thyroid labs during treatment. Of these 241 patients, 13% (31/241) had clinically acted upon thyroid dysfunction prior to, 8% (18/241) during, and 4% (9/241) after ICI. Most patients, 66% (159/241), did not have thyroid labs after ICI, but in the 53 patients with labs and no prior clinical dysfunction, 17% (9/53) developed clinical dysfunction after ICI. In these 9 patients, median time from ICI initiation to dysfunction was 253 days. Two patients with post-treatment laboratory only dysfunction were observed. CONCLUSIONS: ICI-induced thyroid dysfunction arising post-treatment appears more common than previously appreciated, warranting additional evaluation

A Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab in EGFR-Mutant, PD-L1+, Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Naïve Patients With Advanced NSCLC

BackgroundDespite the significant antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in NSCLC, clinical benefit has been less frequently observed in patients whose tumors harbor EGFR mutations compared to EGFR wild-type patients. Our single-center experience on the KEYNOTE-001 trial suggested that pembrolizumab-treated EGFR-mutant patients, who were tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) naïve, had superior clinical outcomes to those previously treated with a TKI. As TKI naïve EGFR-mutants have generally been excluded from pembrolizumab studies, data to guide treatment decisions in this patient population is lacking, particularly in patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50%.MethodsWe conducted a phase II trial (NCT02879994) of pembrolizumab in TKI naive patients with EGFR mutation-positive, advanced NSCLC and PD-L1-positive (≥1%, 22C3 antibody) tumors. Pembrolizumab was administered 200 mg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included safety of pembrolizumab, additional pembrolizumab efficacy endpoints, and efficacy and safety of an EGFR TKI after pembrolizumab.ResultsEnrollment was ceased due to lack of efficacy after 11 of 25 planned patients were treated. Eighty-two percent of trial patients were treatment naïve, 64% had sensitizing EGFR mutations, and 73% had PD-L1 expression ≥50%. Only 1 patient had an objective response (9%), but repeat analysis of this patient's tumor definitively showed the original report of an EGFR mutation to be erroneous. Observed treatment-related adverse events were similar to prior experience with pembrolizumab, but two deaths within 6 months of enrollment, including one attributed to pneumonitis, were of concern.ConclusionsPembrolizumab's lack of efficacy in TKI naïve, PD-L1+, EGFR-mutant patients with advanced NSCLC, including those with PD-L1 expression ≥50%, suggests that it is not an appropriate therapeutic choice in this setting

Consent document translation expense hinders inclusive clinical trial enrolment

Patients from historically under-represented racial and ethnic groups are enrolled in cancer clinical trials at disproportionately low rates in the USA1-3. As these patients often have limited English proficiency4-7, we hypothesized that one barrier to their inclusion is the cost to investigators of translating consent documents. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated more than 12,000 consent events at a large cancer centre and assessed whether patients requiring translated consent documents would sign consent documents less frequently in studies lacking industry sponsorship (for which the principal investigator pays the translation costs) than for industry-sponsored studies (for which the translation costs are covered by the sponsor). Here we show that the proportion of consent events for patients with limited English proficiency in studies not sponsored by industry was approximately half of that seen in industry-sponsored studies. We also show that among those signing consent documents, the proportion of consent documents translated into the patient's primary language in studies without industry sponsorship was approximately half of that seen in industry-sponsored studies. The results suggest that the cost of consent document translation in trials not sponsored by industry could be a potentially modifiable barrier to the inclusion of patients with limited English proficiency

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tumor necrosis factor- blockade in severe persistent asthma

Rationale: The treatment effect of golimumab, a human monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-?, in severe persistent asthma is unknown. Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of golimumab in a large population of patients with uncontrolled, severe persistent asthma. Methods: From 2004 to 2006, 309 patients with severe and uncontrolled asthma, despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting ?2 agonists, were randomized 1:1:1:1 to monthly subcutaneous injections of placebo or golimumab (50, 100, or 200 mg) through Week 52. Coprimary endpoints were the change from baseline through Week 24 in prebronchodilator percent-predicted FEV1 and the number of severe asthma exacerbations through Week 24. Measurements and Main Results: No significant differences were observed for the change in percent-predicted FEV1 (least squares mean: placebo, 2.44 [95% confidence interval (CI) ?0.574 to 5.461]; combined 100-mg and 200-mg, 2.91 [0.696–5.116]) or severe exacerbations (mean ± SD: placebo, 0.5 ± 1.07 vs. combined 100-mg and 200-mg 0.5 ± 0.97) through week 24. Through Week 24, 2.6% of patients treated with placebo vs. 19.5% of those treated with golimumab discontinued the study agent, and 1.3% and 7.8% discontinued study participation, respectively. An unfavorable risk–benefit profile led to early discontinuation of study-agent administration after the Week-24 database lock. Through Week 76, 20.5% of patients treated with placebo and 30.3% of patients treated with golimumab experienced serious adverse events, with serious infections occurring more frequently in golimumab-treated patients. One death and all eight malignancies occurred in the active groups. Conclusions: Overall, treatment with golimumab did not demonstrate a favorable risk–benefit profile in this study population of patients with severe persistent asthma. <br/