27 research outputs found
The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The impact of additive-genetic relationships captured by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the accuracy of genomic breeding values (GEBVs) has been demonstrated, but recent studies on data obtained from Holstein populations have ignored this fact. However, this impact and the accuracy of GEBVs due to linkage disequilibrium (LD), which is fairly persistent over generations, must be known to implement future breeding programs.</p> <p>Materials and methods</p> <p>The data set used to investigate these questions consisted of 3,863 German Holstein bulls genotyped for 54,001 SNPs, their pedigree and daughter yield deviations for milk yield, fat yield, protein yield and somatic cell score. A cross-validation methodology was applied, where the maximum additive-genetic relationship (<it>a</it><sub><it>max</it></sub>) between bulls in training and validation was controlled. GEBVs were estimated by a Bayesian model averaging approach (BayesB) and an animal model using the genomic relationship matrix (G-BLUP). The accuracy of GEBVs due to LD was estimated by a regression approach using accuracy of GEBVs and accuracy of pedigree-based BLUP-EBVs.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Accuracy of GEBVs obtained by both BayesB and G-BLUP decreased with decreasing <it>a</it><sub><it>max </it></sub>for all traits analyzed. The decay of accuracy tended to be larger for G-BLUP and with smaller training size. Differences between BayesB and G-BLUP became evident for the accuracy due to LD, where BayesB clearly outperformed G-BLUP with increasing training size.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>GEBV accuracy of current selection candidates varies due to different additive-genetic relationships relative to the training data. Accuracy of future candidates can be lower than reported in previous studies because information from close relatives will not be available when selection on GEBVs is applied. A Bayesian model averaging approach exploits LD information considerably better than G-BLUP and thus is the most promising method. Cross-validations should account for family structure in the data to allow for long-lasting genomic based breeding plans in animal and plant breeding.</p
Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for cattle stature identifies common genes that regulate body size in mammals
peer-reviewedH.D.D., A.J.C., P.J.B. and B.J.H. would like to acknowledge the Dairy Futures
Cooperative Research Centre for funding. H.P. and R.F. acknowledge funding
from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the
AgroClustEr âSynbreedâSynergistic Plant and Animal Breedingâ (grant 0315527B).
H.P., R.F., R.E. and K.-U.G. acknowledge the Arbeitsgemeinschaft SĂŒddeutscher
RinderzĂŒchter, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Ăsterreichischer FleckviehzĂŒchter
and ZuchtData EDV Dienstleistungen for providing genotype data. A. Bagnato
acknowledges the European Union (EU) Collaborative Project LowInputBreeds
(grant agreement 222623) for providing Brown Swiss genotypes. Braunvieh Schweiz
is acknowledged for providing Brown Swiss phenotypes. H.P. and R.F. acknowledge
the German Holstein Association (DHV) and the ConfederaciĂłn de Asociaciones
de Frisona Española (CONCAFE) for sharing genotype data. H.P. was financially
supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
(DFG) (grant PA 2789/1-1). D.B. and D.C.P. acknowledge funding from the
Research Stimulus Fund (11/S/112) and Science Foundation Ireland (14/IA/2576).
M.S. and F.S.S. acknowledge the Canadian Dairy Network (CDN) for providing the
Holstein genotypes. P.S. acknowledges funding from the Genome Canada project
entitled âWhole Genome Selection through Genome Wide Imputation in Beef Cattleâ and acknowledges WestGrid and Compute/Calcul Canada for providing
computing resources. J.F.T. was supported by the National Institute of Food and
Agriculture, US Department of Agriculture, under awards 2013-68004-20364 and
2015-67015-23183. A. Bagnato, F.P., M.D. and J.W. acknowledge EU Collaborative
Project Quantomics (grant 516 agreement 222664) for providing Brown Swiss
and Finnish Ayrshire sequences and genotypes. A.C.B. and R.F.V. acknowledge
funding from the publicâprivate partnership âBreed4Foodâ (code BO-22.04-011-
001-ASG-LR) and EU FP7 IRSES SEQSEL (grant 317697). A.C.B. and R.F.V.
acknowledge CRV (Arnhem, the Netherlands) for providing data on Dutch and
New Zealand Holstein and Jersey bulls.Stature is affected by many polymorphisms of small effect in humans1. In contrast, variation in dogs, even within breeds, has been suggested to be largely due to variants in a small number of genes2,3. Here we use data from cattle to compare the genetic architecture of stature to those in humans and dogs. We conducted a meta-analysis for stature using 58,265 cattle from 17 populations with 25.4 million imputed whole-genome sequence variants. Results showed that the genetic architecture of stature in cattle is similar to that in humans, as the lead variants in 163 significantly associated genomic regions (P < 5 Ă 10â8) explained at most 13.8% of the phenotypic variance. Most of these variants were noncoding, including variants that were also expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) and in ChIPâseq peaks. There was significant overlap in loci for stature with humans and dogs, suggesting that a set of common genes regulates body size in mammals
Effects of the underlying model in multiple imputation: type I error and risks estimates
Efficiency of multiple imputation for the detection of the true disease susceptibility site in presence of missing data
Dealing with missing data in family-based association studies: A multiple imputation approach
Careers in Creative Industries
Genomic selection (GS) is commonly used in livestock and increasingly in plant breeding. Relying on phenotypes and genotypes of a reference population, GS allows performance prediction for young individuals having only genotypes. This is expected to achieve fast high genetic gain but with a potential loss of genetic diversity. Existing methods to conserve genetic diversity depend mostly on the choice of the breeding individuals. In this study, we propose a modification of the reference population composition to mitigate diversity loss. Since the high cost of phenotyping is the limiting factor for GS, our findings are of major economic interest. This study aims to answer the following questions: how would decisions on the reference population affect the breeding population, and how to best select individuals to update the reference population and balance maximizing genetic gain and minimizing loss of genetic diversity? We investigated three updating strategies for the reference population: random, truncation, and optimal contribution (OC) strategies. OC maximizes genetic merit for a fixed loss of genetic diversity. A French Montbéliarde dairy cattle population with 50K SNP chip genotypes and simulations over 10 generations were used to compare these different strategies using milk production as the trait of interest. Candidates were selected to update the reference population. Prediction bias and both genetic merit and diversity were measured. Changes in the reference population composition slightly affected the breeding population. Optimal contribution strategy appeared to be an acceptable compromise to maintain both genetic gain and diversity in the reference and the breeding populations
Genomic selection in French dairy cattle
Chantier qualité GAGenomic selection is implemented in French Holstein, Montbéliarde, and Normande breeds (70%, 16% and 12% of French dairy cows). A characteristic of the model for genomic evaluation is the use of haplotypes instead of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), so as to maximise linkage disequilibrium between markers and quantitative trait loci (QTLs). For each trait, a QTL-BLUP model (i.e. a best linear unbiased prediction model including QTL random effects) includes 300-700 trait-dependent chromosomal regions selected either by linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis or by elastic net. This model requires an important effort to phase genotypes, detect QTLs, select SNPs, but was found to be the most efficient one among all tested ones. QTLs are defined within breed and many of them were found to be breed specific. Reference populations include 1800 and 1400 bulls in Montbéliarde and Normande breeds. In Holstein, the very large reference population of 18 300 bulls originates from the EuroGenomics consortium. Since 2008, ~65 000 animals have been genotyped for selection by Labogena with the 50k chip. Bulls genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) were made official in June 2009. In 2010, the market share of the young bulls reached 30% and is expected to increase rapidly. Advertising actions have been undertaken to recommend a time-restricted use of young bulls with a limited number of doses. In January 2011, genomic selection was opened to all farmers for females. Current developments focus on the extension of the method to a multi-breed context, to use all reference populations simultaneously in genomic evaluation