Severe COVID-19 in pregnancy is almost exclusively limited to unvaccinated women - time for policies to change Comment

Non peer reviewe

Variations across Europe in hospitalization and management of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 during the initial phase of the pandemic : Multi-national population-based cohort study using the International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems (INOSS)

Funding Information: The national studies reported the following funding sources: The BOSS project was funded by the Belgian Federal Public Service of Health. The NOSS collaboration was supported by the Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (grant no. 6505, 2020). NOSS‐Denmark was supported by grants from The Region of Southern Denmark and Region Zealand's shared fund for joint health research projects (Reg. no. A767), and EasyTrial provided the data collection software. NOSS‐Finland received grants from the Finnish Medical Society, and from Helsinki University. UKOSS received funding from the National Institute for Health Research HS&DR Programme (11/46/12). The national studies in Italy and the Netherlands did not have specific funding. The multi‐national study received partial funding support from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) under the Framework service contract nr EMA/2018/28/PE. The content of this paper expresses the opinions of the authors and may not be understood or quoted as being made on behalf of or reflecting the position of the EMA or any of its committees or working parties. The research leading to these results was conducted as part of the activities of the EU PE&PV (Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance) Research Network, which is a public academic partnership coordinated by Utrecht University, the Netherlands. The CONSIGN project was scientifically coordinated by the University Medical Center, Utrecht. Funding Information: OB declares support from the European Medicines agency (EMA). HE declares grants from the Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG) and Norwegian Research Council (grant no 320181). AA declares a grant from the Region of Southern Denmark and Region Zealand's shared fund for joint health research projects. OA declares grants from the Finnish Medical Association and NFOG. MK declares grants from the National Institute for Health and Care Research, Medical Research Council, Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership and Wellbeing of Women during the course of the study. MS leads a department that conducts studies on COVID‐19 vaccines for the European Medicines Agency, Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Janssen. All support was according to the ENCePP code of conduct. None of the other authors (NV, RR, SD, EJ, EO, MAS, TS, RV, AV, KB) has anything to disclose. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).Introduction: The majority of data on COVID-19 in pregnancy are not from sound population-based active surveillance systems. Material and methods: We conducted a multi-national study of population-based national or regional prospective cohorts using standardized definitions within the International Network of Obstetric Survey systems (INOSS). From a source population of women giving birth between March 1 and August 31, 2020, we included pregnant women admitted to hospital with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test ≤7 days prior to or during admission and up to 2 days after birth. The admissions were further categorized as COVID-19-related or non-COVID-19-related. The primary outcome of interest was incidence of COVID-19-related hospital admission. Secondary outcomes included severe maternal disease (ICU admission and mechanical ventilation) and COVID-19-directed medical treatment. Results: In a source population of 816 628 maternities, a total of 2338 pregnant women were admitted with SARS-CoV-2; among them 940 (40%) were COVID-19-related admissions. The pooled incidence estimate for COVID-19-related admission was 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.27–1.02) per 1000 maternities, with notable heterogeneity across countries (I2 = 97.3%, P = 0.00). In the COVID-19 admission group, between 8% and 17% of the women were admitted to intensive care, and 5%–13% needed mechanical ventilation. Thromboprophylaxis was the most frequent treatment given during COVID-19-related admission (range 14%–55%). Among 908 infants born to women in the COVID-19-related admission group, 5 (0.6%) stillbirths were reported. Conclusions: During the initial months of the pandemic, we found substantial variations in incidence of COVID-19-related admissions in nine European countries. Few pregnant women received COVID-19-directed medical treatment. Several barriers to rapid surveillance were identified. Investment in robust surveillance should be prioritized to prepare for future pandemics.Peer reviewe

Haptic Feedback, Force Feedback, and Force-Sensing in Simulation Training for Laparoscopy : A Systematic Overview

OBJECTIVES: To provide a systematic overview of the literature assessing the value of haptic and force feedback in current simulators teaching laparoscopic surgical skills. DATA SOURCES: The databases of Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched to retrieve relevant studies published until January 31st, 2017. The search included laparoscopic surgery, simulation, and haptic or force feedback and all relevant synonyms. METHODS: Duplicates were removed, and titles and abstracts screened. The remaining articles were subsequently screened full text and included in this review if they followed the inclusion criteria. A total of 2 types of feedback have been analyzed and will be discussed separately: haptic- and force feedback. RESULTS: A total of 4023 articles were found, of which 87 could be used in this review. A descriptive analysis of the data is provided. Results of the added value of haptic interface devices in virtual reality are variable. Haptic feedback is most important for more complex tasks. The interface devices do not require the highest level of fidelity. Haptic feedback leads to a shorter learning curve with a steadier upward trend. Concerning force feedback, force parameters are measured through force sensing systems in the instrument and/or the environment. These parameters, especially in combination with motion parameters, provide box trainers with an objective evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Feedback of force-use both real time and postpractice has been shown to improve training. CONCLUSIONS: Haptic feedback is added to virtual reality simulators to increase the fidelity and thereby improve training effect. Variable results have been found from adding haptic feedback. It is most important for more complex tasks, but results in only minor improvements for novice surgeons. Force parameters and force feedback in box trainers have been shown to improve training results

Haptic feedback, force feedback, and force-sensing in simulation training for laparoscopy: A systematic overview

OBJECTIVES: To provide a systematic overview of the literature assessing the value of haptic and force feedback in current simulators teaching laparoscopic surgical skills. DATA SOURCES: The databases of Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched to retrieve relevant studies published until January 31st, 2017. The search included laparoscopic surgery, simulation, and haptic or force feedback and all relevant synonyms. METHODS: Duplicates were removed, and titles and abstracts screened. The remaining articles were subsequently screened full text and included in this review if they followed the inclusion criteria. A total of 2 types of feedback have been analyzed and will be discussed separately: haptic- and force feedback. RESULTS: A total of 4023 articles were found, of which 87 could be used in this review. A descriptive analysis of the data is provided. Results of the added value of haptic interface devices in virtual reality are variable. Haptic feedback is most important for more complex tasks. The interface devices do not require the highest level of fidelity. Haptic feedback leads to a shorter learning curve with a steadier upward trend. Concerning force feedback, force parameters are measured through force sensing systems in the instrument and/or the environment. These parameters, especially in combination with motion parameters, provide box trainers with an objective evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Feedback of force-use both real time and postpractice has been shown to improve training. CONCLUSIONS: Haptic feedback is added to virtual reality simulators to increase the fidelity and thereby improve training effect. Variable results have been found from adding haptic feedback. It is most important for more complex tasks, but results in only minor improvements for novice surgeons. Force parameters and force feedback in box trainers have been shown to improve training results.Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technolog

Maternal cardiac arrest in the Netherlands: A nationwide surveillance study

Background: Maternal cardiac arrest is a complex and demanding clinical situation requiring a well-attuned team effort of healthcare workers of multiple disciplines. A recent report on maternal cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom reported a rise in incidence over a span of 10 years, while maternal mortality increased in the United States between 2000 and 2014. However, reported causes of maternal cardiac arrest differed between both countries. Objective(s): To determine the incidence, causes and management of maternal cardiac arrest in the Netherlands and compare incidence with previous estimates in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Study design: Using the Netherlands Obstetric Surveillance System, all Dutch cases of maternal cardiac arrest during a three-year period (2013–2016) were prospectively collected. Complete casefile copies were obtained for analysis. Main outcome measures were incidence of maternal cardiac arrest and cardiac arrest in pregnancy, use of perimortem caesarean section if appropriate and maternal death. Results: The monthly card return rate was 97%; 18 women with cardiac arrest during pregnancy and 20 postpartum met the inclusion criteria. Incidence of maternal cardiac arrest was 7.6 per 100,000 pregnancies and 3.6 per 100,000 pregnancies excluding postpartum maternal cardiac arrest. Main causes were pulmonary embolism (n = 9), major obstetric hemorrhage (n = 7) and amniotic fluid embolism (n = 6). Aortocaval compression relief and perimortem caesarean section were performed in 9/14 (29%) and 11/14 (79%) respectively in pregnancies 20 weeks gestational age onwards. Twenty-two women died, representing a case fatality rate of 58% (95% CI 42–72%). Conclusion(s): There is a higher incidence of cardiac arrest in pregnancy compared to both previous estimates in the Netherlands and recently established figures in the United Kingdom. Main causes of maternal cardiac arrest are potentially preventable and/or treatable complications of pregnancy. Insufficient use of critical elements of obstetric resuscitation identifies the need for enhanced obstetric emergency training for obstetric and non-obstetric first responders