51 research outputs found

    Climate Change and Water Scarcity: The Case of Saudi Arabia

    Get PDF
    Background: Climate change is expected to bring increases in average global temperatures (1.4°C–5.8°C [34.52°F–42.44°F] by 2100) and precipitation levels to varying degrees around the globe. The availability and quality of water will be severely affected, and public health threats from the lack of this valuable resource will be great unless water-scarce nations are able to adapt. Saudi Arabia provides a good example of how the climate and unsustainable human activity go hand in hand in creating stress on and depleting water resources, and an example for adaptation and mitigation. Method: A search of the English literature addressing climate change, water scarcity, human health, and related topics was conducted using online resources and databases accessed through the University at Albany, State University of New York library web page. Results: Water scarcity, which encompasses both water availability and water quality, is an important indicator of health. Beyond drinking, water supply is intimately linked to food security, sanitation, and hygiene, which are primary contributors to the global burden of disease. Poor and disadvantaged populations are the ones who will suffer most from the negative effects of climate change on water supply and associated human health issues. Examples of adaptation and mitigation measures that can help reduce the strain on conventional water resources (surface waters and fossil aquifers or groundwater) include desalination, wastewater recycling and reuse, and outsourcing food items or “virtual water trade.” These are strategies being used by Saudi Arabia, a country that is water poor primarily due to decades of irresponsible irrigation practices. The human and environmental health risks associated with these adaptation measures are examined. Finally, strategies to protect human health through international collaboration and the importance of these efforts are discussed. Conclusion: International, multidisciplinary cooperation and collaboration will be needed to promote global water security and to protect human health, particularly in low-income countries that do not have the resources necessary to adapt on their own

    Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19

    Get PDF
    IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 non–critically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022). INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (n = 257), ARB (n = 248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; n = 10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; n = 264) for up to 10 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ support–free days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes. RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ support–free days among critically ill patients was 10 (–1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (n = 231), 8 (–1 to 17) in the ARB group (n = 217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (n = 231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ support–free days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570

    Novel therapeutic strategies for spinal muscular atrophy

    No full text

    Road Traffic Injury as a Major Public Health Issue in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Review

    Get PDF
    Injury was the largest single cause of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and death in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia I 2013. The vast majority of injury-related fatalities are deaths caused by road traffic. Measures to control this serious public health issue, which has significant consequences for both Saudi families and the Saudi economy as a whole, have been underway for years but with little success. Most attempts at intervening revolve around attempts for enforce stricter traffic laws and by installing automated traffic monitoring systems that will catch law breakers on camera and issue tickets and fines. While there has been much research on various factors that play a role in the high rate of road traffic injury in The Kingdom (e.g., driver behavior, animal collisions, disobeying traffic and pedestrian signals, environmental elements), virtually no attention has been given to examining why Saudi drivers behave the way that they do. This review provides a thorough account of the present situation in Saudi Arabia and discusses how health behavior theory can be used to gain a better understanding of driver behavior

    PLA2R Antibody Does Not Outperform Conventional Clinical Markers in Predicting Outcomes in Membranous Nephropathy

    No full text
    IntroductionThe prognostic value of PLA2R antibody (Ab) test in clinical practice remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate its ability in predicting hard outcomes in primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) after adjustments to conventional markers of disease activity.MethodsA total of 222 patients diagnosed with PMN from January 2003 to July 2019 having had a serum PLA2R Ab test, were included from 3 centers in the north of England. Baseline conventional markers, PLA2R-Ab-status (positive vs. negative), Ab-titer (high vs. low), and time of testing (pre-PLA2R era vs. PLA2R era) were evaluated for association with outcomes. Primary outcome was time to progression (composite of doubling of creatinine, stage 5 chronic kidney disease, or death). Secondary outcomes were time to partial remission (PR) and time to immunosuppression. Cox proportional hazard testing was used.ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 5.26 years, progression was seen in 65 (29.3%) and PR in 179 of 222 patients (80.6%). There was a clear association of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (standardized hazard ratio [HRZ] = 0.767, P Z = 1.44, P Z = 0.606, P P = 0.71) or time to PR (aHR = 0.84, P = 0.13). Similarly, baseline high Ab-titer was not associated with time to progression (aHR = 1.07, P = 0.77) or time to PR (aHR = 0.794, P = 0.08).ConclusionOnce adjusted to conventional markers of disease activity, baseline PLA2R Ab-positivity or Ab-titer do not predict disease progression or time to PR. Further studies are needed to harness the utility of PLA2R Ab test in prognostication in PMN
    corecore