76 research outputs found

    Introduction BUFFER SYSTEMS AND BIOCOMPATIBILITY IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS

    Get PDF

    Peritoneal Dialysis

    Get PDF

    Recovery of Renal Function after One-Year of Dialysis Treatment: Case Report and Registry Data

    Get PDF
    Objective. Uncertainty has arisen as to whether renal function can be recovered from after long-term regular dialysis treatment. We therefore conducted an analysis and scrutinized one patient report. Material and Methods. Swedish registry of patients with kidney disease and one patient case. Results. 39 patients (0.2%) from the Swedish registry comprising 17590 patients who commenced RRT (renal replacement therapy) between 1991 and 2008 had recovered from renal function after more than 365 days of regular dialysis treatment. The most common diagnosis was renovascular disease with hypertension but a large group had uremia of unknown cause. HUS, cortical/tubular necrosis, and autoimmune diseases were also found. The mean treatment time before withdrawal was 2 years. Conclusions. A small number of patients recover after a long period of regular dialysis treatment. One could discuss whether it is difficult to identify patients who have recovered while undergoing regular dialysis treatment. Regular monitoring of renal function may be important

    A functional variant of the myeloperoxidase gene is associated with cardiovascular disease in end-stage renal disease patients

    Get PDF
    A functional variant of the myeloperoxidase gene is associated with cardiovascular disease in end-stage renal disease patients. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients and there is emerging evidence that genetic factors may contribute to the development of atherosclerosis. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is an abundant enzyme involved in the production of free radicals. A functional G→A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) has been identified at position -463, where the A allele is associated with lower MPO expression. To analyze the association between this SNP and inflammation, oxidative stress, and CVD, we studied a cohort of 155 ESRD patients (52 ± 1 years, 62% males, 22% diabetics) shortly before the initiation of dialysis treatment. CVD was defined by medical history criteria; plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) was used as a marker of inflammation, and plasma pentosidine as an estimation of oxidative protein damage. DNA from leukocytes was used for genotyping, performed by the pyrosequencing reaction. Only five patients (3%) had the genotype AA at the -463 position, whereas 38 (25%) had the GA and 112 (72%) had the GG genotype. No differences were noted in plasma IL-6 levels between the genotype groups, whereas the pentosidine levels were higher in the GG group (28.4 pmol/mg albumin [range, 8.5 to 123 pmol/mg albumin]) compared to the other two groups (21.4 pmol/mg albumin [range, 7.6 to 384 pmol/mg albumin; P < 0.05]). Patients with the GG genotype had a higher prevalence of positive serology for Chlamydia pneumoniae (51%) when compared to the carriers of the A allele (24%) (P < 0.05). The prevalence of CVD was lower in the AA (0%) and GA genotypes (18%), compared to the GG genotype (35%). The GG genotype was still associated with CVD after correction for age, diabetes, smoking, malnutrition, and inflammation. Our findings suggest that the -463 G→A SNP, which supposedly results in lower MPO activity, is associated with a lower prevalence of CVD in ESRD patients. It could be speculated that this effect is mediated by a decreased oxidative stress due to lower production of free radicals

    The future of European Nephrology 'Guidelines' - a declaration of intent by European Renal Best Practice (ERBP)

    Get PDF
    The disparities of medical practice, together with a growing number of possible interventions, have increased the demand for well-conceived guidance for practitioners [1]. However, this development is hampered by the number and quality of scientific studies that test medical hypotheses, which are often unsatisfactory. This is especially true in nephrology, where well-conducted controlled trials are rare [2]. Because patients with renal failure are generally excluded from controlled studies in the general population [3], the development of sufficiently well-founded guidance in nephrology has always been difficult. With the development of European Best Practice Guidelines (EBPG), the European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplantation Association (ERA–EDTA) has created its own guidance-generating process. Similar initiatives have also arisen in the USA (Kidney Disease Outcome Initiative—K/DOQI), Australia (Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment—CARI), Canada (Canadian Society of Nephrology—CSN), the UK (United Kingdom Renal Association—UKRA), as well as at several other locations around the world. These institutions have generated a plethora of often parallel recommendations on similar topics but sometimes with different messages [4]. The question can be asked: ‘Is there still a place for an institution generating European nephrology guidance?’ If there is, how should such an initiative be managed to conform with current demands? To answer these questions, the Council of ERA–EDTA set up a commission that convened three times in the course of 2008–09. The present text is a distillation of the discussions, reflections and final conclusions of this commission. It is an ad hoc document, reflecting the current status. In the future, concepts and attitudes might change, as medical thinking is influenced by changes in practice, needs, general philosophy, ethics and political/financial conditions

    Preface : “Practical Research on Gamification in Education (2)”

    Get PDF
    <p>(A) Areas under the curves (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) in 746 patients for pentosidine in relation to all-cause mortality.(B) Areas under the curves (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) in 746 patients for pentosidine in relation to CVD-mortality.</p

    Converting from face-to-face to postal follow-up and its effects on participant retention, response rates and errors:lessons from the EQUAL study in the UK

    Get PDF
    Background: Prospective cohort studies are challenging to deliver, with one of the main difficulties lying in retention of participants. The need to socially distance during the COVID-19 pandemic has added to this challenge. The pre-COVID-19 adaptation of the European Quality (EQUAL) study in the UK to a remote form of follow-up for efficiency provides lessons for those who are considering changing their study design. Methods: The EQUAL study is an international prospective cohort study of patients ≥65 years of age with advanced chronic kidney disease. Initially, patients were invited to complete a questionnaire (SF-36, Dialysis Symptom Index and Renal Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire) at research clinics every 3–6 months, known as “traditional follow-up” (TFU). In 2018, all living patients were invited to switch to “efficient follow-up” (EFU), which used an abbreviated questionnaire consisting of SF-12 and Dialysis Symptom Index. These were administered centrally by post. Response rates were calculated using returned questionnaires as a proportion of surviving invitees, and error rates presented as the average percentage of unanswered questions or unclear answers, of total questions in returned questionnaires. Response and error rates were calculated 6-monthly in TFU to allow comparisons with EFU. Results: Of the 504 patients initially recruited, 236 were still alive at the time of conversion to EFU; 111 of these (47%) consented to the change in follow-up. In those who consented, median TFU was 34 months, ranging from 0 to 42 months. Their response rates fell steadily from 88% (98/111) at month 0 of TFU, to 20% (3/15) at month 42. The response rate for the first EFU questionnaire was 60% (59/99) of those alive from TFU. With this improvement in response rates, the first EFU also lowered errors to baseline levels seen in early follow-up, after having almost trebled throughout traditional follow-up. Conclusions: Overall, this study demonstrates that administration of shorter follow-up questionnaires by post rather than in person does not negatively impact patient response or error rates. These results may be reassuring for researchers who are trying to limit face-to-face contact with patients during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Suboptimal dialysis initiation is associated with comorbidities and uraemia progression rate but not with estimated glomerular filtration rate

    Get PDF
    Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA.Background: Despite early referral of uraemic patients to nephrological care, suboptimal dialysis initiation (SDI) remains a common problem associated with increased morbimortality. We hypothesized that SDI is related to pre-dialysis care. Methods: In the 'Peridialysis' study, time and reasons for dialysis initiation (DI), clinical and biochemical data and centre characteristics were registered during the pre- and peri-dialytic period for 1583 end-stage kidney disease patients starting dialysis over a 3-year period at 15 nephrology departments in the Nordic and Baltic countries to identify factors associated with SDI. Results: SDI occurred in 42%. Risk factors for SDI were late referral, cachexia, comorbidity (particularly cardiovascular), hypoalbuminaemia and rapid uraemia progression. Patients with polycystic renal disease had a lower incidence of SDI. High urea and C-reactive protein levels, acidosis and other electrolyte disorders were markers of SDI, independently of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). SDI patients had higher eGFR than non-SDI patients during the pre-dialysis period, but lower eGFR at DI. eGFR as such did not predict SDI. Patients with comorbidities had higher eGFR at DI. Centre practice and policy did not associate with the incidence of SDI. Conclusions: SDI occurred in 42% of all DIs. SDI was associated with hypoalbuminaemia, comorbidity and rate of eGFR loss, but not with the degree of renal failure as assessed by eGFR.Peer reviewe

    First-year mortality in incident dialysis patients : results of the Peridialysis study

    Get PDF
    Funding Information: We thank all physicians and other staff members who participated in this study. Baxter Novum is the result of a grant from Baxter Healthcare to Karolinska Institutet. Thanks to Sara Denguir for data collection assistance. Funding Information: The project was supported by an unrestricted grant from Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, Illinois, USA, grant number 05253284. The funder had no role in study design; collection, analysis and interpretation of data; writing the report; or the decision to submit the report for publication. Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).BACKGROUND: Controversy surrounds which factors are important for predicting early mortality after dialysis initiation (DI). We investigated associations of predialysis course and circumstances affecting planning and execution of DI with mortality following DI. METHODS: Among 1580 patients participating in the Peridialysis study, a study of causes and timing of DI, we registered features of predialysis course, clinical and biochemical data at DI, incidence of unplanned suboptimal DI, contraindications to peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis (HD), and modality preference, actual choice, and cause of modality choice. Patients were followed for 12 months or until transplantation. A flexible parametric model was used to identify independent factors associated with all-cause mortality. RESULTS: First-year mortality was 19.33%. Independent factors predicting death were high age, comorbidity, clinical contraindications to PD or HD, suboptimal DI, high eGFR, low serum albumin, hyperphosphatemia, high C-reactive protein, signs of overhydration and cerebral symptoms at DI. Among 1061 (67.2%) patients who could select dialysis modality based on personal choice, 654 (61.6%) chose PD, 368 (34.7%) center HD and 39 (3.7%) home HD. The 12-months survival did not differ significantly between patients receiving PD and in-center HD. CONCLUSIONS: First-year mortality in incident dialysis patients was in addition to high age and comorbidity, associated with clinical contraindications to PD or HD, clinical symptoms, hyperphosphatemia, inflammation, and suboptimal DI. In patients with a "free" choice of dialysis modality based on their personal preferences, PD and in-center HD led to broadly similar short-term outcomes.publishersversionPeer reviewe
    corecore