Lung Cancer in Peru

Peru is a South American nation with a growing and aging population of 31 million people with a life expectancy at birth of 76.7 years. The country is divided into 25 regions, 79% of the population is urban, and Lima, the capital, concentrates more than a third of the population.1 Although Peru is an upper-middle-income country, health expenditure represents only 5.1% of the gross domestic product, which is lower than the average of Latin America and the Caribbean (LATAM) (8.56%).2 Out-of-pocket health expenditure is 30.9%.3 Peru has a comprehensive National Cancer Plan and two population-based cancer registries in Lima and Arequipa.Revisión por pare

Características clínico-patológicas y sobrevida en mujeres jóvenes con cáncer cervical: análisis retrospectivo del Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas

Objective. To determine the clinical and histological characteristics and prognostic factors of cervical cancer (CC) in young Peruvian patients. Materials and methods. Retrospective analysis of patients younger than 35 years old diagnosed with CC between 2008 and 2012 in the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas. Results. 449 patients had epithelial neoplasms. The main histological types were: squamous cell carcinoma (84.9%), adenocarcinoma (11.0%) and adenosquamous carcinoma (2.4%). The average tumor size was 4.98 cm. Anemia (55.7%), elevated creatinine (21.2%) and hydronephrosis (13.8%) were also identified. 82.3% of the patients presented locally advanced disease. Stages IIB (47.4%) and IIIB (25.8%) were the most common. Overall 5-year survival was 59.5% (I, 90.9%; II, 57.5%; III, 42.7% and IV, 13.3%). Elevated creatinine, anemia, tumor size, parametrial involvement and hydronephrosis were factors that affected survival. No significant relation was found between histological type and survival. The presence of anemia (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI 95%]: 1.6-4.0) and hydronephrosis (aHR: 1.6; CI 95%: 1.0-4.0) were independently associated with survival; likewise, the parametrial commitment with (aHR: 3.3; CI 95%: 1.5-7.2) or without (aRH: 2.6; CI 95%: 1.3-5.3) extension to the pelvic bone. Conclusions. Cervical cancer in young Peruvians is diagnosed in advanced stages. Overall survival in each stage is similar to the reported in older patients. The importance of conventional prognosisrelated factors was confirmed. Anemia was an important independent prognostic factor requiring further investigations. Objetivos. Determinar las características clínicas, histológicas y los factores pronósticos del cáncer cervical (CC) en pacientes jóvenes peruanas. Materiales y métodos. Análisis retrospectivo de pacientes de 35 años de edad o menos diagnosticadas con CC entre el 2008 y el 2012 en el Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas. Resultados. 449 pacientes tenían neoplasias epiteliales. Los tipos histológicos principales fueron: carcinoma de células escamosas (84,9%), adenocarcinoma (11,0%) y carcinoma adenoescamoso (2,4%). El tamaño tumoral promedio fue 4,98 cm. También se identificó anemia (55,7%), creatinina elevada (21,2%) e hidronefrosis (13,8%). El 82,3% de los pacientes presentaron enfermedad localmente avanzada. Los estadios IIB (47,4%) y IIIB (25,8%) fueron los más comunes. La supervivencia global a 5 años fue de 59,5% (I, 90,9%; II, 57,5%; III, 42,7% y IV, 13,3%). La creatinina elevada, la anemia, el tamaño tumoral, el compromiso parametrial y la hidronefrosis fueron factores que afectaron la supervivencia. No se encontró relación significativa entre el tipo histológico y la supervivencia. La presencia de anemia (Hazard Ratio ajustado [HRa]: 2,5; intervalo de confianza al 95% [IC 95%]: 1,6-4,0) y la hidronefrosis (HRa: 1,6; IC 95%: 1,0-4,0) estuvieron independientemente asociados con la supervivencia; asimismo, el compromiso parametrial con (HRa: 3,3; IC 95%: 1,5-7,2) o sin (HRa: 2,6; IC 95%: 1,3-5,3) extensión al hueso pélvico. Conclusiones. El cáncer cervical en jóvenes peruanas es diagnosticado en estadios avanzados. La supervivencia global en cada estadio es similar a la reportada en pacientes mayores. Se confirmó la importancia de los factores convencionales relacionados con el pronóstico. La anemia fue un factor de pronóstico independiente importante que requiere mayores investigaciones

Health-related quality of life with pembrolizumab or placebo plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer (KEYNOTE-826): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: In the KEYNOTE-826 study, the addition of the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab to chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab improved overall survival and progression-free survival (primary endpoints) versus placebo plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab, with manageable toxicity, in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. In this Article, we report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KEYNOTE-826. METHODS: KEYNOTE-826 is a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial in 151 cancer treatment centres in 19 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer not previously treated with systemic chemotherapy (previous radiosensitising chemotherapy was allowed) and not amenable to curative treatment and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally by means of an interactive voice response system in a double-blind manner to receive either pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks intravenously for up to 35 cycles plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel 175 mg/m FINDINGS: Between Nov 20, 2018, and Jan 31, 2020, of 883 patients screened, 617 were randomly assigned (pembrolizumab group, n=308; placebo group, n=309). 587 (95%) of 617 patients received at least one dose of study treatment and completed at least one post-baseline PRO assessment and were therefore included in the PRO analyses (pembrolizumab group, n=290; placebo group, n=297). Median follow-up was 22·0 months (IQR 19·1-24·4). At week 30, QLQ-C30 completion was 199 (69%) of 290 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 168 (57%) of 297 patients in the placebo group; compliance was 199 (94%) of 211 and 168 (90%) of 186, respectively. The least squares mean change in QLQ-C30 GHS-QoL score from baseline to week 30 was -0·3 points (95% CI -3·1 to 2·6) in the pembrolizumab group and -1·3 points (-4·2 to 1·7) in the placebo group, with a between-group difference in least squares mean change of 1·0 point (95% CI -2·7 to 4·7). Median time to true deterioration in GHS-QoL was not reached (NR; 95% CI 13·4 months-NR) in the pembrolizumab group and 12·9 months (6·6-NR) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·84 [95% CI 0·65-1·09]). 122 (42%) of 290 patients in the pembrolizumab group versus 85 (29%) of 297 in the placebo group had improved GHS-QoL at any time during the study (p=0·0003). INTERPRETATION: Addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab did not negatively affect health-related quality of life. Along with the efficacy and safety results already reported from KEYNOTE-826, these data support the benefit of pembrolizumab and the value of immunotherapy in patients with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic cervical cancer. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme

L’année 2021 dans tous ses états : une synthèse digérée

International audience5548 Background: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death by gynecological cancer. Complete surgery remains one of the main prognostic factors. Laparoscopic exploration is mandatory to assess surgical resectability at diagnosis or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, there is no clinical or biological marker that can correctly predict resectability and may be able to avoid a second laparoscopic exploration for initially unresectable diseases. Our aim was to assess circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) value as a predictive non-invasive marker of evolution towards resectability for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy. Methods: We explored in this work one of the secondary objectives of the CIDOC study (NCT03302884). CIDOC is a multicenter prospective study aiming to explore ctDNA value as early marker of disease relapse after first-line treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients with mucinous histology or early stages not requiring chemotherapy are excluded. Plasma samples are collected at diagnosis, during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and during follow-up. After DNA extraction, panel-based next generation sequencing is performed on both tumor samples and germline DNA, and somatic mutations of interest are selected for ctDNA monitoring. ctDNA analyses are conducted using droplet digital PCR (BioRad QX200) by measuring the variant allele fraction (VAF) of previously identified mutations. Results: This intermediary analysis has included 47 patients diagnosed between March 2017 and December 2019. Median age was 69 years old (48 – 84). Most of the patients had advanced disease (89.4% stage FIGO III or IV), serous histology (94.8%), and high grade tumor (92.3%). Most of the patients underwent complete interval cytoreductive surgery (76.3% vs 17.4% complete upfront surgery). Most of the tumors had TP53 mutations (85.1%), following by alterations involving DNA repair genes (38.3%). Median cell-free DNA concentration at baseline was 0.38 ng/µL (0 – 12.8). ctDNA was identified in 92.1% of patients at baseline with a median VAF of 1.84% (0 – 42.52%). ctDNA VAF was correlated to the peritoneal dissemination ( p= 0.039) assessed with the peritoneal cancer index. ctDNA clearance after preoperative chemotherapy tended to be correlated to achievement of complete interval surgery for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( p= 0.108). Conclusions: ctDNA may be a promising non-invasive marker to assess peritoneal cancer spreading and to predict surgical resectability after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. If confirmed in larger populations, this may enable to avoid additional surgical explorations for patients who remain ctDNA positive after chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03302884