9 research outputs found
Cyclodextrin-complexed Ocimum basilicum leaves essential oil increases fos protein expression in the central nervous system and produce an antihyperalgesic effect in animal models for fibromyalgia
O. basilicum leaves produce essential oils (LEO) rich in monoterpenes. The
short half-life and water insolubility are limitations for LEO medical uses. ÎČ-Cyclodextrin
(ÎČ-CD) has been employed to improve the pharmacological properties of LEO. We
assessed the antihyperalgesic profile of LEO, isolated or complexed in ÎČ-CD (LEO/ÎČ-CD),
on an animal model for fibromyalgia. Behavioral tests: mice were treated every day with
either LEO/ÎČ-CD (25, 50 or 100 mg/kg, p.o.), LEO (25 mg/kg, p.o.), tramadol (TRM
4 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle (saline), and 60 min after treatment behavioral parameters were
assessed. Therefore, mice were evaluated for mechanical hyperalgesia (von Frey), motor
coordination (Rota-rod) and muscle strength (Grip Strength Metter) in a mice fibromyalgia
model. After 27 days, we evaluated the central nervous system (CNS) pathways involved in
the effect induced by experimental drugs through immunofluorescence protocol to Fos protein.
The differential scanning analysis (DSC), thermogravimetry/derivate thermogravimetry
(TG/DTG) and infrared absorption spectroscopy (FTIR) curves indicated that the products
prepared were able to incorporate the LEO efficiently. Oral treatment with LEO or LEO-ÎČCD,
at all doses tested, produced a significant reduction of mechanical hyperalgesia and we were
able to significantly increase Fos protein expression. Together, our results provide evidence
that LEO, isolated or complexed with ÎČ-CD, produces analgesic effects on chronic
non-inflammatory pain as fibromyalgia
Abarema cochliacarpos extract decreases the inflammatory process and skeletal muscle injury induced by bothrops leucurus venom
Snakebites are a public health problem, especially in tropical countries.However, treatment with antivenomhas limited effectiveness
against venomsâ local effects. Here, we investigated the ability of Abarema cochliacarpos hydroethanolic extract (EAc) to protect
mice against injection of Bothrops leucurus venom. Swiss mice received perimuscular venom injection and were subsequently
treated orally with EAc in different doses. Treatment with EAc 100, 200, and 400mg/kg reduced the edema induced by B. leucurus
in 1%, 13%, and 39%, respectively. Although lower doses showed no antihypernociceptive effect in the Von Frey test, the higher
dose significantly reduced hyperalgesia induced by the venom. Antimyotoxic activity of EAc was also observed by microscopy
assessment, with treated muscles presenting preserved structures, decreased edema, and inflammatory infiltrate as compared to
untreated ones. Finally, on the rotarod test, the treated mice showed better motor function, once muscle fibers were preserved
and there were less edema and pain. Treated mice could stand four times more time on the rotating rod than untreated ones. Our
results have shown that EAc presented relevant activities against injection of B. leucurus venom in mice, suggesting that it can be
considered as an adjuvant in the treatment of envenomation
Antioxidant activity and mechanisms of action of natural compounds isolated from lichens : a systematic review
Chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes, neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases are characterized by an enhanced state of oxidative stress, which may result from the overproduction of reactive species and/or a decrease in antioxidant defenses. The search for new chemical entities with antioxidant profile is still thus an emerging field on ongoing interest. Due to the lack of reviews concerning the antioxidant activity of lichen-derived natural compounds, we performed a review of the antioxidant potential and mechanisms of action of natural compounds isolated from lichens. The search terms âlichensâ, âantioxidantsâ and âantioxidant response elementsâ were used to retrieve articles in LILACS, PubMed and Web of Science published until February 2014. From a total of 319 articles surveyed, 32 met the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. It was observed that the most common isolated compound studied was usnic acid, cited in 14 out of the 32 articles. The most often described antioxidant assays for the study of in vitro antioxidant activity were mainly DPPH, LPO and SOD. The most suggested mechanisms of action were scavenging of reactive species, enzymatic activation and inhibition of iNOS. Thus, compounds isolated from lichens are possible candidates for the management of oxidative stress, and may be useful in the treatment of chronic diseases
Antioxidant activity and mechanisms of action of natural compounds isolated from lichens : a systematic review
Chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes, neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases are characterized by an enhanced state of oxidative stress, which may result from the overproduction of reactive species and/or a decrease in antioxidant defenses. The search for new chemical entities with antioxidant profile is still thus an emerging field on ongoing interest. Due to the lack of reviews concerning the antioxidant activity of lichen-derived natural compounds, we performed a review of the antioxidant potential and mechanisms of action of natural compounds isolated from lichens. The search terms âlichensâ, âantioxidantsâ and âantioxidant response elementsâ were used to retrieve articles in LILACS, PubMed and Web of Science published until February 2014. From a total of 319 articles surveyed, 32 met the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. It was observed that the most common isolated compound studied was usnic acid, cited in 14 out of the 32 articles. The most often described antioxidant assays for the study of in vitro antioxidant activity were mainly DPPH, LPO and SOD. The most suggested mechanisms of action were scavenging of reactive species, enzymatic activation and inhibition of iNOS. Thus, compounds isolated from lichens are possible candidates for the management of oxidative stress, and may be useful in the treatment of chronic diseases
Molecular modeling of BPP-BrachyNH<sub>2</sub> and human ACE and <i>in silico</i> docking studies.
<p>(A) Theoretical model of BPP-BrachyNH<sub>2</sub> showing the structure with lower energy system; (B) theoretical model of ACE showing the structure with lower energy system; (C) Docking between BPP-BrachyNH<sub>2</sub>/ACE; (D) binary complex relationship with zoom in and detailed interactions; and (E) interactions between the substrate and the catalytic triad His<sup>383</sup>, His<sup>387</sup> and Glu<sup>411</sup>, indicating a probable block of the catalytic activity.</p
Sequencing of the proline-rich peptides (PROs) from the skin secretion of <i>B</i>. <i>ephippium</i>.
<p>(A) Mass spectra of BPP-Brachy, [M+H]<sup>+</sup> = 907.37 and (B) BPP-BrachyNH<sub>2</sub>, [M+H]<sup>+</sup> = 906.36 acquired in an UltraFlex III MALDI-TOF/TOF operating under LIFTâą mode for MS/MS experiments. The observed fragments allowed complete assignment of the major y and b ion series. The peptide sequence using one-letter code following the y and b series orientation is shown on the top part of the spectra.</p
The inhibitory effect of BPP-BrachyNH<sub>2</sub> and captopril on rat serum ACE activity.
<p>Residual enzymatic activities are plotted against the corresponding inhibitor concentrations. IC<sub>50</sub> values were calculated from nonlinear regression analysis of obtained data using GraphPad 5.0 software (GraphPad Prism, San Diego, CA).</p
Vasodilator effect of BPP-BrachyNH<sub>2</sub> and captopril (10<sup>â9</sup>â3 Ă 10<sup>â5</sup> M) on rat thoracic aorta.
<p>Aortic rings were pre-contracted with phenylephrine (3 Ă 10<sup>â7</sup> M) and then cumulatively incubated with BPP-BrachyNH<sub>2</sub> (A) or captopril (B). Effect of L-NAME (100 ÎŒM) on BPP-BrachyNH<sub>2</sub>-induced vasodilator effect (C). Respective comparisons among E<sub>max</sub> (D) values were plotted. The results were expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). Non-paired Studentâs t test. <sup>**</sup><i>p</i> < 0.01 and <sup>***</sup><i>p</i> < 0.001 versus endothelium-intact (E+) preparations.</p