Potentially Severe Incidents During Interhospital Transport of Critically Ill Patients, Frequently Occurring But Rarely Reported: A Prospective Study

Objectives The out-of-hospital environment can pose significant challenges to the quality and safety of interhospital transport of critically ill patients. Because we lack knowledge of the occurrence of incidents, their potential consequences, and whether they are actually reported, this study was initiated. Methods Two different services in Norway were asked to self-report incidents after every interhospital transport of critically ill patients. Sampling lasted for 12 and 8 months, respectively. An expert group evaluated each incident for severity and demand for reporting into the hospital’s electronic incident reporting system. One year later, the hospital’s reporting system was scrutinized to determine the number of incidents actually reported. Results A total of 455 transports of critically ill patients were performed, resulting in 294 unique incidents reported: medical (15%), technical (25%), missing equipment (17%), and personal failures and communication difficulties (42%). Only 3 (1%) of the 294 unique incidents were actually reported in the hospital’s electronic incident reporting system. The experts were inconsistent in which incidents should have been reported and to what degree checklists, standard operating procedures, simulation, and training could have prevented the incidents. Conclusions This study of interhospital transports of critically ill patients reveals a very high number of incidents. Despite this fact, these incidents are severely underreported in the hospital’s electronic incident reporting system. This suggests that learning is lost and errors with predominant probability are repeated. These results emphasize the existing challenges in regard to the quality and safety of interhospital transport of critically ill patients.publishedVersio

The role of local context for managers’ strategies when adapting to the COVID-19 pandemic in Norwegian homecare services: a multiple case study

Background The COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on healthcare systems around the world, and lack of resources, lack of adequate preparedness and infection control equipment have been highlighted as common challenges. Healthcare managers’ capacity to adapt to the challenges brought by the COVID-19 pandemic is crucial to ensure safe and high-quality care during a crisis. There is a lack of research on how these adaptations are made at different levels of the homecare services system and how the local context influences the managerial strategies applied in response to a healthcare crisis. This study explores the role of local context for managers’ experiences and strategies in homecare services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods A qualitative multiple case study in four municipalities with different geographic locations (centralized and decentralized) across Norway. A review of contingency plans was performed, and 21 managers were interviewed individually during the period March to September 2021. All interviews were conducted digitally using a semi-structured interview guide, and data was subjected to inductive thematic analysis. Results The analysis revealed variations in managers’ strategies related to the size and geographical location of the homecare services. The opportunities to apply different strategies varied among the municipalities. To ensure adequate staffing, managers collaborated, reorganized, and reallocated resources within their local health system. New guidelines, routines and infection control measures were developed and implemented in the absence of adequate preparedness plans and modified according to the local context. Supportive and present leadership in addition to collaboration and coordination across national, regional, and local levels were highlighted as key factors in all municipalities. Conclusion Managers who designed new and adaptive strategies to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic were central in ensuring high-quality Norwegian homecare services. To ensure transferability, national guidelines and measures must be context-dependent or -sensitive and must accommodate flexibility at all levels in a local healthcare service system.publishedVersio

Differences in time-critical interventions and radiological examinations between adult and older trauma patients: A national register-based study

BACKGROUND Older trauma patients are reported to receive lower levels of care than younger adults. Differences in clinical management between adult and older trauma patients hold important information about potential trauma system improvement targets. The aim of this study was to compare prehospital and early in-hospital management of adult and older trauma patients, focusing on time-critical interventions and radiological examinations. METHODS Retrospective analysis of the Norwegian Trauma Registry for 2015 through 2018. Trauma patients 16 years or older met by a trauma team and with New Injury Severity Score of 9 or greater were included, dichotomized into age groups 16 years to 64 years and 65 years or older. Prehospital and emergency department clinical management, advanced airway management, chest decompression, and admission radiological examinations was compared between groups applying descriptive statistics and appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS There were 9543 patients included, of which 28% (n = 2711) were 65 years or older. Older patients, irrespective of injury severity, were less likely attended by a prehospital doctor/paramedic team (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57–0.71), conveyed by air ambulance (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.58–0.73), and transported directly to a trauma center (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79–0.94). Time-critical intervention and primary survey radiological examination rates only differed between age groups among patients with New Injury Severity Score of 25 or greater, showing lower rates for older adults (advanced airway management: OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47–0.76; chest decompression: OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25–0.85; x-ray chest: OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39–0.75; x-ray pelvis: OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57–0.84). However, for the patients attended by a doctor/paramedic team, there were no management differences between age groups. CONCLUSION Older trauma patients were less likely to receive advanced prehospital care compared with younger adults. Older patients with very severe injuries received fewer time-critical interventions and radiological examinations. Improved dispatch of doctor/paramedic teams to older adults and assessment of the impact the observed differences have on outcome are future research priorities

Would you be interested in participating in a study about hospital readmissions…? Experiences with methodological strategies and techniques for recruiting GPs to participate in qualitative research

General Practitioners (GPs) are an asset in healthcare research, considering the amount of knowledge they hold about the primary healthcare service. However, GPs have proven difficult to recruit as participants in both quantitative and qualitative research (Asch, Connor, Hamilton, & Fox, 2000; Hummers-Pradier et al., 2008; Parkinson et al., 2015). The difficulties in recruiting GPs have been attributed to their great workload and their perception of a gap between the theory-laden research and their own practical work (Rosemann & Szecsenyi, 2004; Leysen et al., 2019). However, own experiences of recruiting GPs to participate in a qualitative study disclosed that the picture might be more nuanced than described in previous reports. The objective of this paper is to describe the methodological strategies and techniques for the recruitment process, and discuss the difficulties in recruiting GPs to participate in research and possible reasons for such difficulties. It was based on experiences from a recently conducted study on GPs, which aimed to increase knowledge about the GPs’ role in hospital readmissions from the primary healthcare service (Glette, Kringeland, Røise, & Wiig, 2018).publishedVersio

Exploring physicians' decision-making in hospital readmission processes - a comparative case study

© The Author(s) 2018Background Hospital readmissions is an increasingly serious international problem, associated with higher risks of adverse events, especially in elderly patients. There can be many causes and influential factors leading to hospital readmissions, but they are often closely related, making hospital readmissions an overall complex area. In addition, a comprehensive coordination reform was introduced into the Norwegian healthcare system in 2012. The reform changed the premises for readmissions with economic incentives enhancing early transfer from secondary to primary care, making research on readmissions in the municipalities more urgent than ever. General practitioners (GPs) and nursing home physicians, have traditionally held a gatekeepers function in hospital readmissions from the municipal healthcare service, as they are the main decision-makers in questions of hospital readmissions. Still, the GPs’ gatekeeper function is an under-investigated area in hospital readmission research. The aim of the study was to increase knowledge about factors that lead to hospital readmissions among elderly in municipal healthcare, with special attention to GPs’ and nursing home physicians’ decision making. Method The study was conducted as a comparative case study. Two municipalities affiliated with the same hospital, but with different readmission rates were recruited. Twenty GPs and nursing home physicians from each municipality were recruited and interviewed. Forty hours of observation were conducted during the huddles in one long-term and one short-term nursing home in each municipality. Results Seven themes describing how different factors influence physicians’ decision-making in the hospital readmission process in two municipalities were identified. Poor communication, continuity and information flow account for hospital readmissions in both municipalities. Several factors, including nurse staffing and competence, patients and their families, time constraints and experience affected physicians’ decision-making. Conclusion Communication, continuity and information flow contributed to hospital readmissions in both municipalities. The cross-case analysis revealed slight differences between municipalities. More research focusing on GPs’ and nursing home physicians’ decision-making, nursing home nurses and home care nurses’ experience of hospital readmissions and discharges is needed.publishedVersio

Care pathways and factors associated with interhospital transfer to neurotrauma centers for patients with isolated moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: a population-based study from the Norwegian trauma registry

Background Systems ensuring continuity of care through the treatment chain improve outcomes for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Non-neurosurgical acute care trauma hospitals are central in providing care continuity in current trauma systems, however, their role in TBI management is understudied. This study aimed to investigate characteristics and care pathways and identify factors associated with interhospital transfer to neurotrauma centers for patients with isolated moderate-to-severe TBI primarily admitted to acute care trauma hospitals. Methods A population-based cohort study from the national Norwegian Trauma Registry (2015–2020) of adult patients (≥16 years) with isolated moderate-to-severe TBI (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] Head≥3, AIS Body<3 and maximum 1 AIS Body=2). Patient characteristics and care pathways were compared across transfer status strata. A generalized additive model was developed using purposeful selection to identify factors associated with transfer and how they affected transfer probability. Results The study included 1735 patients admitted to acute care trauma hospitals, of whom 692 (40%) were transferred to neurotrauma centers. Transferred patients were younger (median 60 vs. 72 years, P<0.001), more severely injured (median New Injury Severity Score [NISS]: 29 vs. 17, P<0.001), and had lower admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (≤13: 55% vs. 27, P<0.001). Increased transfer probability was significantly associated with reduced GCS scores, comorbidity in patients<77 years, and increasing NISSs until the effect was inverted at higher scores. Decreased transfer probability was significantly associated with increasing age and comorbidity, and distance between the acute care trauma hospital and the nearest neurotrauma center, except for extreme NISSs. Conclusions Acute care trauma hospitals managed a substantial burden of isolated moderate-to-severe TBI patients primarily and definitively, highlighting the importance of high-quality neurotrauma care in non-neurosurgical hospitals. The transfer probability declined with increasing age and comorbidity, suggesting that older patients were carefully selected for transfer to specialized care

Compensation claims in pediatric orthopedics in Norway between 2012 and 2018: a nationwide study of 487 patients

publishedVersionpublishedVersio