24 research outputs found

    Estimating hypothetical estimands with causal inference and missing data estimators in a diabetes trial

    Full text link
    The recently published ICH E9 addendum on estimands in clinical trials provides a framework for precisely defining the treatment effect that is to be estimated, but says little about estimation methods. Here we report analyses of a clinical trial in type 2 diabetes, targeting the effects of randomised treatment, handling rescue treatment and discontinuation of randomised treatment using the so-called hypothetical strategy. We show how this can be estimated using mixed models for repeated measures, multiple imputation, inverse probability of treatment weighting, G-formula and G-estimation. We describe their assumptions and practical details of their implementation using packages in R. We report the results of these analyses, broadly finding similar estimates and standard errors across the estimators. We discuss various considerations relevant when choosing an estimation approach, including computational time, how to handle missing data, whether to include post intercurrent event data in the analysis, whether and how to adjust for additional time-varying confounders, and whether and how to model different types of ICE separately

    XVI International Congress of Control Electronics and Telecommunications: "Techno-scientific considerations for a post-pandemic world intensive in knowledge, innovation and sustainable local development"

    Get PDF
    Este título, sugestivo por los impactos durante la situación de la Covid 19 en el mundo, y que en Colombia lastimosamente han sido muy críticos, permiten asumir la obligada superación de tensiones sociales, políticas, y económicas; pero sobre todo científicas y tecnológicas. Inicialmente, esto supone la existencia de una capacidad de la sociedad colombiana por recuperar su estado inicial después de que haya cesado la perturbación a la que fue sometida por la catastrófica pandemia, y superar ese anterior estado de cosas ya que se encontraban -y aún se encuentran- muchos problemas locales mal resueltos, medianamente resueltos, y muchos sin resolver: es decir, habrá que rediseñar y fortalecer una probada resiliencia social existente - producto del prolongado conflicto social colombiano superado parcialmente por un proceso de paz exitoso - desde la tecnociencia local; como lo indicaba Markus Brunnermeier - economista alemán y catedrático de economía de la Universidad de Princeton- en su libro The Resilient Society…La cuestión no es preveerlo todo sino poder reaccionar…aprender a recuperarse rápido.This title, suggestive of the impacts during the Covid 19 situation in the world, and which have unfortunately been very critical in Colombia, allows us to assume the obligatory overcoming of social, political, and economic tensions; but above all scientific and technological. Initially, this supposes the existence of a capacity of Colombian society to recover its initial state after the disturbance to which it was subjected by the catastrophic pandemic has ceased, and to overcome that previous state of affairs since it was found -and still is find - many local problems poorly resolved, moderately resolved, and many unresolved: that is, an existing social resilience test will have to be redesigned and strengthened - product of the prolonged Colombian social conflict partially overcome by a successful peace process - from local technoscience; As Markus Brunnermeier - German economist and professor of economics at Princeton University - indicates in his book The Resilient Society...The question is not to foresee everything but to be able to react...learn to recover quickly.Bogot

    Causal inference from observational studies in clinical research : lessons learned from kidney transplantation and beyond

    No full text

    Supervivencia en pacientes con trasplante hepático realizado en la Fundación Cardioinfantil entre 2005 y 2013

    No full text
    Introducción: El trasplante hepático es la terapia de elección para los pacientes con enfermedad hepática terminal, logrando mejorar su expectativa y calidad de vida, de acuerdo a estudios realizados en otros países. En la Fundación Cardioinfantil – Instituto de Cardiología (FCI-IC) se han realizado 332 trasplantes hepáticos hasta el 2014, pero no se conoce la supervivencia y los factores pronósticos propios de los pacientes intervenidos. \ud \ud Objetivo Principal: Estimar la supervivencia a 1, 3 y 5 años e identificar los principales factores pronósticos de los pacientes a quienes se les realizó trasplante hepático en el periodo 2005-2013 en la FCI-IC. \ud \ud Método: Estudio observacional y retrospectivo, basado en revisión de historias clínicas de los pacientes adultos a quienes se les realizó trasplante hepático en el periodo 2005-2013 en la FCI-IC.\ud \ud Resultados: La supervivencia al año fue de 90.91% (IC95% 86.40-93.98), a los 3 años 83.64% (IC95% 77.89-88.01) y a los 5 años de 79.18% (IC95% 72.54-84.39). Los principales factores pronósticos fueron el antecedente de ascitis (HR 2.449, IC 1.252 – 4.792), la edad del donante (HR 1.040, IC 1.009 – 1.071) y el receptor (HR 1.037, IC 1.014 – 1.060). Se encontró una mayor supervivencia en los pacientes con cirrosis alcohólica (HR 0.099, IC 0.021 – 0.467). \ud \ud Conclusiones: El estudio mostró una supervivencia mayor a la reportada en estudios realizados en Estados Unidos (67.4-73.0% a los 5 años) y España (73,3% a los 3 años) y similar a la de Chile (80.0% a los 5 años). Cabe resaltar que estos estudios incluyeron series más grandes de pacientes.Introduction: Liver transplantation is the therapy of choice for patients with end-stage liver disease because it improves their life expectancy and quality of life, according to studies conducted in other countries. In the Fundación Cardioinfantil – Instituto de Cardiología (FCI-IC), 332 liver transplants have been performed since 2005, but the survival and prognostic factors of the patients undergoing surgery is not known.\ud \ud Objective: To estimate the survival after 1, 3 and 5 years of the transplantation and to identify the main prognostic factor of patients who underwent liver transplantation between 2005 and 2013 in the FCI-IC.\ud \ud Method: Observational, retrospective study, based on the review of medical records of adult patients who underwent liver transplantation in the period 2005-2013 in the FCI-IC.\ud \ud Results: One-year survival was 90.91% (95% CI 86.40-93.98), at 3 years 83.64% (95% CI 77.89-88.01) and 5 years of 79.18% (95% CI 72.54-84.39). The main prognostic factors were a history of ascites (HR 2.449, IC 1252-4792), donor age (HR 1.040, IC 1009-1071) and recipient age (HR 1.037, IC 1014-1060). Increased survival was found in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (HR 0.099, IC 0021-0467).\ud \ud Conclusions: The study showed a greater survival than that reported in studies conducted in the United States (67.4-73.0% at 5 years), Spain (73.3% at 3 years) and Chile (80.0% survival 5 years). It should be noted that these studies included larger patient series

    Supervivencia en pacientes con trasplante hepático realizado en la Fundación Cardioinfantil entre 2005 y 2013

    No full text
    Introducción: El trasplante hepático es la terapia de elección para los pacientes con enfermedad hepática terminal, logrando mejorar su expectativa y calidad de vida, de acuerdo a estudios realizados en otros países. En la Fundación Cardioinfantil – Instituto de Cardiología (FCI-IC) se han realizado 332 trasplantes hepáticos hasta el 2014, pero no se conoce la supervivencia y los factores pronósticos propios de los pacientes intervenidos. Objetivo Principal: Estimar la supervivencia a 1, 3 y 5 años e identificar los principales factores pronósticos de los pacientes a quienes se les realizó trasplante hepático en el periodo 2005-2013 en la FCI-IC. Método: Estudio observacional y retrospectivo, basado en revisión de historias clínicas de los pacientes adultos a quienes se les realizó trasplante hepático en el periodo 2005-2013 en la FCI-IC. Resultados: La supervivencia al año fue de 90.91% (IC95% 86.40-93.98), a los 3 años 83.64% (IC95% 77.89-88.01) y a los 5 años de 79.18% (IC95% 72.54-84.39). Los principales factores pronósticos fueron el antecedente de ascitis (HR 2.449, IC 1.252 – 4.792), la edad del donante (HR 1.040, IC 1.009 – 1.071) y el receptor (HR 1.037, IC 1.014 – 1.060). Se encontró una mayor supervivencia en los pacientes con cirrosis alcohólica (HR 0.099, IC 0.021 – 0.467). Conclusiones: El estudio mostró una supervivencia mayor a la reportada en estudios realizados en Estados Unidos (67.4-73.0% a los 5 años) y España (73,3% a los 3 años) y similar a la de Chile (80.0% a los 5 años). Cabe resaltar que estos estudios incluyeron series más grandes de pacientes.Introduction: Liver transplantation is the therapy of choice for patients with end-stage liver disease because it improves their life expectancy and quality of life, according to studies conducted in other countries. In the Fundación Cardioinfantil – Instituto de Cardiología (FCI-IC), 332 liver transplants have been performed since 2005, but the survival and prognostic factors of the patients undergoing surgery is not known. Objective: To estimate the survival after 1, 3 and 5 years of the transplantation and to identify the main prognostic factor of patients who underwent liver transplantation between 2005 and 2013 in the FCI-IC. Method: Observational, retrospective study, based on the review of medical records of adult patients who underwent liver transplantation in the period 2005-2013 in the FCI-IC. Results: One-year survival was 90.91% (95% CI 86.40-93.98), at 3 years 83.64% (95% CI 77.89-88.01) and 5 years of 79.18% (95% CI 72.54-84.39). The main prognostic factors were a history of ascites (HR 2.449, IC 1252-4792), donor age (HR 1.040, IC 1009-1071) and recipient age (HR 1.037, IC 1014-1060). Increased survival was found in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (HR 0.099, IC 0021-0467). Conclusions: The study showed a greater survival than that reported in studies conducted in the United States (67.4-73.0% at 5 years), Spain (73.3% at 3 years) and Chile (80.0% survival 5 years). It should be noted that these studies included larger patient series

    Different pediatric survival after cardiac arrest

    No full text

    Hypothetical Estimands in Clinical Trials: A Unification of Causal Inference and Missing Data Methods.

    Get PDF
    The ICH E9 addendum introduces the term intercurrent event to refer to events that happen after treatment initiation and that can either preclude observation of the outcome of interest or affect its interpretation. It proposes five strategies for handling intercurrent events to form an estimand but does not suggest statistical methods for estimation. In this article we focus on the hypothetical strategy, where the treatment effect is defined under the hypothetical scenario in which the intercurrent event is prevented. For its estimation, we consider causal inference and missing data methods. We establish that certain “causal inference estimators” are identical to certain “missing data estimators.” These links may help those familiar with one set of methods but not the other. Moreover, using potential outcome notation allows us to state more clearly the assumptions on which missing data methods rely to estimate hypothetical estimands. This helps to indicate whether estimating a hypothetical estimand is reasonable, and what data should be used in the analysis. We show that hypothetical estimands can be estimated by exploiting data after intercurrent event occurrence, which is typically not used. Supplementary materials for this article are available online

    Trial emulation and survival analysis for disease incidence registers : A case study on the causal effect of pre-emptive kidney transplantation

    No full text
    When drawing causal inference from observed data, failure time outcomes present additional challenges of censoring often combined with other missing data patterns. In this article, we follow incident cases of end-stage renal disease to examine the effect on all-cause mortality of starting treatment with transplant, so-called pre-emptive kidney transplantation, vs starting with dialysis possibly followed by delayed transplantation. The question is relatively simple: which start-off treatment is expected to bring the best survival for a target population? To address it, we emulate a target trial drawing on the long term Swedish Renal Registry, where a growing common set of baseline covariates was measured nationwide. Several lessons are learned which pertain to long term disease registers more generally. With characteristics of cases and versions of treatment evolving over time, informative censoring is already introduced in unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curves. This leads to misrepresented survival chances in observed treatment groups. The resulting biased treatment association may be aggravated upon implementing IPW for treatment. Aware of additional challenges, we further recall how similar studies to date have selected patients into treatment groups based on events occurring post treatment initiation. Our study reveals the dramatic impact of resulting immortal time bias combined with other typical features of long-term incident disease registers, including missing covariates during the early phases of the register. We discuss feasible ways of accommodating these features when targeting relevant estimands, and demonstrate how more than one causal question can be answered relying on the no unmeasured baseline confounders assumption
    corecore