54 research outputs found
Leadership of healthcare commissioning networks in England : a mixed-methods study on clinical commissioning groups
Objective: To explore the relational challenges for general practitioner (GP) leaders setting up new network-centric commissioning organisations in the recent health policy reform in England, we use innovation network theory to identify key network leadership practices that facilitate healthcare innovation.
Design: Mixed-method, multisite and case study research.
Setting: Six clinical commissioning groups and local clusters in the East of England area, covering in total 208 GPs and 1 662 000 population.
Methods: Semistructured interviews with 56 lead GPs, practice managers and staff from the local health authorities (primary care trusts, PCT) as well as various healthcare professionals; 21 observations of clinical commissioning group (CCG) board and executive meetings; electronic survey of 58 CCG board members (these included GPs, practice managers, PCT employees, nurses and patient representatives) and subsequent social network analysis.
Main outcome measures: Collaborative relationships between CCG board members and stakeholders from their healthcare network; clarifying the role of GPs as network leaders; strengths and areas for development of CCGs.
Results: Drawing upon innovation network theory provides unique insights of the CCG leaders’ activities in establishing best practices and introducing new clinical pathways. In this context we identified three network leadership roles: managing knowledge flows, managing network coherence and managing network stability. Knowledge sharing and effective collaboration among GPs enable network stability and the alignment of CCG objectives with those of the wider health system (network coherence). Even though activities varied between commissioning groups, collaborative initiatives were common. However, there was significant variation among CCGs around the level of engagement with providers, patients and local authorities. Locality (sub) groups played an important role because they linked commissioning decisions with patient needs and brought the leaders closer to frontline stakeholders.
Conclusions: With the new commissioning arrangements, the leaders should seek to move away from dyadic and transactional relationships to a network structure, thereby emphasising on the emerging relational focus of their roles. Managing knowledge mobility, healthcare network coherence and network stability are the three clinical leadership processes that CCG leaders need to consider in coordinating their network and facilitating the development of good clinical commissioning decisions, best practices and innovative services. To successfully manage these processes, CCG leaders need to leverage the relational capabilities of their network as well as their clinical expertise to establish appropriate collaborations that may improve the healthcare services in England. Lack of local GP engagement adds uncertainty to the system and increases the risk of commissioning decisions being irrelevant and inefficient from patient and provider perspectives
Factors influencing crop rotation strategies on organic farms with different time periods since conversion to organic production
Understanding effects of multiple farm management practices on barley performance
Because of the complexity of farming systems, the combined effects of farm management practices on nitrogen availability, nitrogen uptake by the crop and crop performance are not well understood. To evaluate the effects of the temporal and spatial variability of management practices, we used data from seventeen farms and projections to latent structures analysis (PLS) to examine the contribution of 11 farm characteristics and 18 field management practices on barley performance during the period 2009-2012. Farm types were mixed (crop livestock) and arable and were categorized as old organic, young organic or conventional farms. The barley performance indicators included nitrogen concentrations in biomass (in grain and whole biomass) and dry matter at two growing stages. Fourteen out of 29 farm characteristics and field management practices analysed best explained the variation of the barley performance indicators, at the level of 56%, while model cross-validation revealed a goodness of prediction of 31%. Greater crop diversification on farm, e.g., a high proportion of rotational leys and pasture, which was mostly observed among old organic farms, positively affected grain nitrogen concentration. The highest average grain nitrogen concentration was found in old organic farms (2.3% vs. 1.7 and 1.4% for conventional and young organic farms, respectively). The total nitrogen translocated in grain was highest among conventional farms (80 kg ha(-1) vs. 33 and 39 kg ha(-1) for young and old organic farms, respectively). The use of mineral fertilizers and pesticides increased biomass leading to significant differences in average grain yield which became more than double for conventional farms (477 +/- 24 g m(-2)) compared to organic farms (223 +/- 37 and 196 +/- 32 g m(-2) for young and old organic farms, respectively). In addition to the importance of weed control, management of crop residues and the organic fertilizer application methods in the current and three previous years, were identified as important factors affecting the barley performance indicators that need closer investigation. With the PLS approach, we were able to highlight the management practices most relevant to barley performance in different farm types. The use of mineral fertilizers and pesticides on conventional farms was related to high cereal crop biomass. Organic management practices in old organic farms increased barley N concentration but there is a need for improved management practices to increase biomass production and grain yield. Weed control, inclusion of more leys in rotation and organic fertilizer application techniques are some of the examples of management practices to be improved for higher N concentrations and biomass yields on organic farms
Exploring factors that influence the spread and sustainability of a dysphagia innovation: an instrumental case study
Background: Swallowing difficulties challenge patient safety due to the increased risk of malnutrition, dehydration
and aspiration pneumonia. A theoretically driven study was undertaken to examine the spread and sustainability of
a locally developed innovation that involved using the Inter-Professional Dysphagia Framework to structure
education for the workforce. A conceptual framework with 3 spread strategies (hierarchical control, participatory
adaptation and facilitated evolution) was blended with a processual approach to sustaining organisational change.
The aim was to understand the processes, mechanism and outcomes associated with the spread and sustainability
of this safety initiative.
Methods: An instrumental case study, prospectively tracked a dysphagia innovation for 34 months (April 2011
to January 2014) in a large health care organisation in England. A train-the-trainer intervention (as participatory
adaptation) was deployed on care pathways for stroke and fractured neck of femur. Data were collected at the
organisational and clinical level through interviews (n = 30) and document review. The coding frame combined
the processual approach with the spread mechanisms. Pre-determined outcomes included the number of staff
trained about dysphagia and impact related to changes in practice.
Results: The features and processes associated with hierarchical control and participatory adaptation were
identified. Leadership, critical junctures, temporality and making the innovation routine were aspects of hierarchical
control. Participatory adaptation was evident on the care pathways through stakeholder responses, workload and
resource pressures. Six of the 25 ward based trainers cascaded the dysphagia training. The expected outcomes
were achieved when the top-down mandate (hierarchical control) was supplemented by local engagement and
support (participatory adaptation).
Conclusions: Frameworks for spread and sustainability were combined to create a ‘small theory’ that described
the interventions, the processes and desired outcomes a priori. This novel methodological approach confirmed
what is known about spread and sustainability, highlighted the particularity of change and offered new insights
into the factors associated with hierarchical control and participatory adaptation. The findings illustrate the dualities
of organisational change as universal and context specific; as particular and amendable to theoretical generalisation.
Appreciating these dualities may contribute to understanding why many innovations fail to become routine
Crop residue, manure and fertilizer in dryland maize under reduced tillage in northern China: II nutrient balances and soil fertility
The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy:Is policy formulation to blame?
Entrepreneurship policy has been criticised for its lack of effectiveness. Some scholars, such as Scott Shane in this journal, have argued that it is ‘bad’ public policy. But this simply begs the question why the legislative process should generate bad policy? To answer this question this study examines the UK’s enterprise policy process in the 2009–2010 period. It suggests that a key factor for the ineffectiveness of policy is how it is formulated. This stage in the policy process is seldom visible to those outside of government departments and has been largely ignored by prior research. The application of institutional theory provides a detailed theoretical understanding of the actors and the process by which enterprise policy is formulated. We find that by opening up the ‘black box’ of enterprise policy formulation, the process is dominated by powerful actors who govern the process with their interests
Beyond NIMBYs and NOOMBYs:what can wind farm controversies teach us about public involvement in hospital closures?
Background Many policymakers, researchers and commentators argue that hospital closures are necessary as health systems adapt to new technological and financial contexts, and as population health needs in developed countries shift. However closures are often unpopular with local communities. Previous research has characterised public opposition as an obstacle to change. Public opposition to the siting of wind farms, often described as NIMBYism (Not In My Back Yard), is a useful comparator issue to the perceived NOOMBYism (Not Out Of My Back Yard) of hospital closure protestors. Discussion The analysis of public attitudes to wind farms has moved from a fairly crude characterisation of the ‘attitude-behaviour gap’ between publics who support the idea of wind energy, but oppose local wind farms, to empirical, often qualitative, studies of public perspectives. These have emphasised the complexity of public attitudes, and revealed some of the ‘rational’ concerns which lie beneath protests. Research has also explored processes of community engagement within the wind farm decision-making process, and the crucial role of trust between communities, authorities, and developers. Summary Drawing on what has been learnt from studies of opposition to wind farms, we suggest a range of questions and approaches to explore public perspectives on hospital closure more thoroughly. Understanding the range of public responses to service change is an important first step in resolving the practical dilemma of effecting health system transformation in a democratic fashion
Describing knowledge encounters in healthcare: a mixed studies systematic review and development of a classification
This review was self-funded
- …