Food and nutrition security discursive frames in the context of the Spanish economic crisis

[EN] The recent economic crisis in Spain has provoked a number of food and nutrition security (FNS) impacts that have fuelled a fragmented landscape of food-related debates, although these have not taken the form of a coherent and allembracing public discussion on national food security. This paper is an inductive analysis of such debates, mostly based on media coverage, in an attempt to disentangle the different discourse frames on FNS in Spain, and the role played by the economic crisis in the shaping and underpinning of such frames. For this purpose a frame matrix was constructed, paying particular attention to the stakeholders governance claims in order to confront frame-specific problems. Results show how stakeholders have used elements of the crisis to underpin or reinterpret their core arguments. In addition, governance claims have concentrated on the malfunctioning of the food chain, mostly due to unequal bargaining power, and the way this could be putting at risk crucial components of the food system and future FNS. Also, the short-termism of most stakeholders approaches obscures the long run threats to the Spanish food system.This research is part of the project "Assessment of the impact of global drivers of change on Europe's food security" (TRANSMANGO), granted by the EU under 7th Framework Programme, theme KBBE.2013.2.5-01, Grant agreement no: 613532. Authors gratefully appreciate the comments and suggestions made by the three anonymous reviewers and the editors of the Journal.OOrtiz Miranda, D.; Moreno Pérez, OM.; Arnalte Alegre, EV. (2016). Food and nutrition security discursive frames in the context of the Spanish economic crisis. Food Security. 8(3):665-677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-016-0574-xS66567783Antentas, J. M., & Vivas, E. (2014). Impacto de la crisis en el derecho a una alimentación sana y saludable. Informe SESPAS 2014. Gaceta Sanitaria, 28(S1), 58–61.Brunori, G., Malandrin, V., & Rossi, A. (2013). Trade-off or convergence? The role of food security in the evolution of food discourse in Italy. Journal of Rural Studies, 29, 19–29.Candel, J. J., Breeman, G. E., Stiller, S. J., & Termeer, C. J. (2014). Disentangling the consensus frame of food security: the case of the EU common agricultural policy reform debate. Food Policy, 44, 47–58.CFS – Committee on World Food Security (2012). Coming to Terms with Terminology. http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/sites/default/files/file/Terminology/MD776(CFS___Coming_to_terms_with_Terminology).pdf . Accessed 6 Oct 2015.Cussó, X., & Garrabou, R. (2009). Dieta mediterránea y transición nutricional moderna en España. In L. G. Zubero, R. H. García, & J. M. Lázaro (Eds.), Economía Alimentaria en España durante el siglo XX (pp. 25–63). Madrid: MARM.De Schutter, O. (2014). The specter of productivism and food democracy. Wisconsin Law Review, 199, 199–233.DEFRA (2008). Ensuring the UK’s food security in a changing world. London: A Defra Discussion Paper.Díaz-Méndez, C., & Gómez-Benito, C. (2010). Nutrition and the Mediterranean diet. A historical and sociological analysis of the concept of a “healthy diet” in Spanish society. Food Policy, 35(5), 437–447.Dibden, J., Gibbs, D., & Cocklin, C. (2013). Framing GM crops as food security solution. Journal of Rural Studies, 29, 59–70.Ericksen, P. J. (2008). Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change, 18, 234–245.FAO (2014). The State of the World’s Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture. http://www.fao.org/nr/solaw/maps-and-graphs/en/ . Accessed 25 Feb 2015.Fish, R., Lobley, M., & Winter, M. (2013). A license to produce? Farmer interpretations of the new food security agenda. Journal of Rural Studies, 29, 40–49.Grando, S., & Colombo, L. (2015). National Report. Italy. WP2 report Transmango EU-FP7.GREENPEACE (2014). Alimentos bajo amenaza. Valor económico de la polinización y vulnerabilidad de la agricultura española ante el declive de las abejas y otros polinizadores. Madrid: Greenpeace.Hertel, T. W. (2015). The challenges of sustainably feeding a growing planet. Food Security, 7, 185–198.Hispacoop (2012). Estudio sobre desperdicio de alimentos en los hogares. Madrid: Confederación Española de Cooperativas de Consumidores y Usuarios.Lang, T., & Heasman, M. (2004). Food wars. The global battle for mouths, Minds and Markets. London: Earthscan.Lawrence, G., & McMichael, P. (2012). The question of food security. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture & Food, 19(2), 135–142.MAGRAMA. (2014). La balanza commercial agroalimentaria en 2013. Madrid.Maye, D., & Kirwan, J. (2013). Food security: a fractured consensus. Journal of Rural Studies, 29, 1–6.McKeon, N. (2015). Food security governance: empowering communities, regulating corporations. New York: Routledge.Mooney, P. H., & Hunt, S. A. (2009). Food security: the elaboration of contested claims to a consensus frame. Rural Sociology, 74(4), 469–497.Moreno, O. (2013). Reproducing productivism in Spanish agricultural systems. In D. Ortiz, A. Moragues, & E. Arnalte (Eds.), Agriculture in Mediterranean Europe: between old and new paradigms. Research in rural sociology and development (pp. 121–147). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Muñoz, C., & Sosvilla, S. (2014). Alimentamos el futuro. Informe económico 2013. Madrid: FIAB.OECC - Oficina Española de Cambio Climático (2006). Plan Nacional de Adaptación al Cambio Climático. Madrid.OECC-UCLM (2005). Evaluación Preliminar de los Impactos en España por Efecto del Cambio Climático. Madrid: MAGRAMA.Pangaribowo, E. H., Gerber, N., & Torero, M. (2013). Food and Nutrition Security Indicators: A Review. ZEF working paper no 108. Bonn: ZEF.Sáez-Almendros, S., Obrador, B., Bach-Faig, A., & Serra-Majem, L. (2013). Environmental footprints of Mediterranean versus Western dietary patterns: beyond the health benefits of the Mediterranean diet. Environmental Health, 12, 118.Shepherd, B. (2012). Thinking critically about food security. Security Dialogue, 43(3), 195–212.Sineiro, F. (2012). Situación actual, retos y perspectivas del vacuno de leche. Available at http://www.eumedia.es/portales/files/documentos/2-FSineiro.pdf . Accessed 19 Nov 2015.Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: bringing culture back. Journal of Communication, 57, 60–78.Van Gorp, B., & van der Goot, M. J. (2012). Sustainable food and agriculture: Stakeholder’s frames. Communication, Culture & Critique, 5, 127–148.Vidal, R., Moliner, E., Pikula, A., Mena-Nieto, A., & Ortega, A. (2015). Comparison of the carbon footprint of different patient diets in a Spanish hospital. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 20(1), 39–44

Method to identify opportunities for CCU at regional level — Matching sources and receivers

Carbon Capture and Utilization is an attractive strategy not only due to its potential for CO2 emissions reduction but also because it enables the creation of valuable products. The development of CO2-based industrial symbiosis partnerships can contribute significantly towards achieving the goals of GHG emissions reduction on a European level by 2030, while at the same time it leads to an increased added value through the development of new production lines and carbon neutral products. The presented article focuses on identifying potential partnerships between companies that produce CO2 and companies that may reuse CO2 as input for their industrial process. A novel methodological framework is presented based on developing generic matrices for CO2 sources and receivers and matching the industrial units based on geographical and technical criteria. Moreover, the paper provides the technical requirements of 17 CO2 utilization technologies with relatively high technology readiness level, including the CO2-to-product ratio, the required purity, pressure, temperature and the presence of a catalyst, as well as potential synergies and additional requirements. The methodology has been applied to the Västra Götaland region in West Sweden and the most promising CCU symbiosis have been identified. These include mineral carbonation (annual uptake: 59,600 tCO2), greenhouses (26,000 tCO2), algae production, methanol production (85,500 tCO2), power to gas (66,500 tCO2), pH control, lignin production, polymers synthesis and concrete curing (96,000 tCO2). If all of them could be applied, the total annual CO2 reduction would exceed 250,000 tCO2 per year