Serotonin exerts a direct modulatory role on bladder afferent firing in mice

Serotonin (5-HT) is an excitatory mediator, which in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, plays a physiological role in gut-brain signaling and which is dysregulated in functional GI disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Patients suffering from IBS frequently suffer from urological symptoms characteristic of interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome, which manifests due to cross-sensitization of shared innervation pathways between the bladder and colon. However, a direct modulatory role of 5-HT in bladder afferent signaling and its role in colon-bladder neuronal crosstalk remain elusive. The aim of this study was to investigate the action of 5-HT on bladder afferent signaling in normal mice and mice with chronic visceral hypersensitivity (CVH) following trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS) induced colitis. Bladder afferent activity was recorded directly using ex vivo afferent nerve recordings. Expression of 14 5-HT receptor subtypes, the serotonin transporter (SERT) and 5-HT producing enzymes were determined in the urothelium using RT-PCR. Retrograde labelling of bladder projecting dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons was used to investigate expression of 5-HT3 receptors using single cell RT-PCR, while sensory neuronal and urothelial responses to 5-HT were determined by live cell calcium imaging. 5-HT elicited bladder afferent firing predominantly via 5-HT3 receptors expressed on afferent terminals. CVH animals showed a downregulation of SERT mRNA expression in urothelium, suggesting increased 5-HT bioavailability. Granisetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, reversed bladder afferent hypersensitivity in CVH mice. These data suggest 5-HT exerts a direct effect on bladder afferents to enhance signaling. 5-HT3 antagonists could therefore be a potential therapeutic target to treat functional bladder and bowel disorders

The Cultural Evolution of Democracy: Saltational Changes in A Political Regime Landscape

Transitions to democracy are most often considered the outcome of historical modernization processes. Socio-economic changes, such as increases in per capita GNP, education levels, urbanization and communication, have traditionally been found to be correlates or ‘requisites’ of democratic reform. However, transition times and the number of reform steps have not been studied comprehensively. Here we show that historically, transitions to democracy have mainly occurred through rapid leaps rather than slow and incremental transition steps, with a median time from autocracy to democracy of 2.4 years, and overnight in the reverse direction. Our results show that autocracy and democracy have acted as peaks in an evolutionary landscape of possible modes of institutional arrangements. Only scarcely have there been slow incremental transitions. We discuss our results in relation to the application of phylogenetic comparative methods in cultural evolution and point out that the evolving unit in this system is the institutional arrangement, not the individual country which is instead better regarded as the ‘host’ for the political system