A Rhetorical Analysis of Political and Legal Speeches of Robert B. Crosby

I first saw Robert Crosby as a lawyer defending Duane Pope in November 1965. I was intensely interested in the Pope trial for a number of reasons. I was interested because, first, as a law student I found the legal points of interest, second, one of my law professors, Wallace Rudolph, was serving as an assistant defense counsel in the trial and, third, having a bachelors degree in speech I wanted to see what part speaking played in this trial. As I began graduate work in speech I took a course entitled Rhetorical Criticism under Dr. Donald O. Olson. I chose to study the speaking of former Governor Robert Crosby as the final assignment in the course. After preliminary research it became evident that certain speeches of Bob Crosby\u27s might merit study as a thesis project. In a course entitled Introduction to Graduate Studies I submitted an adgendum of procedure on a thesis project with certain aspects of Robert Crosby\u27s speaking as the subject. In the course Dr. Leroy Laase offered suggestions as to method, techniques and procedures for procurement and use of materials to complete such a study. Preliminary research had revealed that very little research had been published in regard to legal speaking. Likewise research did not seem to exist which dealt with both political and legal speaking done by the same speaker. Crosby\u27s defense of Duane Pope seemed to stand out as an example of his legal speaking. Likewise Operation Honesty stood out as an example of Crosby\u27s political speaking. Taxes problems and Crosby\u27s attempts to deal with those problems seemed to be one of the most important aspects of his public career. In analysing these two examples of Crosby\u27s speeches and speaking, the following questions were considered: 1. What training and experience has Robert B. Crosby had in speech and speech making? 2. What were the characteristics of Crosby\u27s deliberative or political speaking as exemplified by his Operation Honesty speech? 3. What were the characteristics of Crosby\u27s forensic or legal speaking as exemplified by his summation in the United States v. Duane Pope? 4. What similarities and differences were revealed by an analysis of Crosby\u27s deliverative and forensic speaking as exemplified by Operation Honesty and U.S. v. Duane Pope

A Rhetorical Analysis of Political and Legal Speeches of Robert B. Crosby

I first saw Robert Crosby as a lawyer defending Duane Pope in November 1965. I was intensely interested in the Pope trial for a number of reasons. I was interested because, first, as a law student I found the legal points of interest, second, one of my law professors, Wallace Rudolph, was serving as an assistant defense counsel in the trial and, third, having a bachelors degree in speech I wanted to see what part speaking played in this trial. As I began graduate work in speech I took a course entitled Rhetorical Criticism under Dr. Donald O. Olson. I chose to study the speaking of former Governor Robert Crosby as the final assignment in the course. After preliminary research it became evident that certain speeches of Bob Crosby\u27s might merit study as a thesis project. In a course entitled Introduction to Graduate Studies I submitted an adgendum of procedure on a thesis project with certain aspects of Robert Crosby\u27s speaking as the subject. In the course Dr. Leroy Laase offered suggestions as to method, techniques and procedures for procurement and use of materials to complete such a study. Preliminary research had revealed that very little research had been published in regard to legal speaking. Likewise research did not seem to exist which dealt with both political and legal speaking done by the same speaker. Crosby\u27s defense of Duane Pope seemed to stand out as an example of his legal speaking. Likewise Operation Honesty stood out as an example of Crosby\u27s political speaking. Taxes problems and Crosby\u27s attempts to deal with those problems seemed to be one of the most important aspects of his public career. In analysing these two examples of Crosby\u27s speeches and speaking, the following questions were considered: 1. What training and experience has Robert B. Crosby had in speech and speech making? 2. What were the characteristics of Crosby\u27s deliberative or political speaking as exemplified by his Operation Honesty speech? 3. What were the characteristics of Crosby\u27s forensic or legal speaking as exemplified by his summation in the United States v. Duane Pope? 4. What similarities and differences were revealed by an analysis of Crosby\u27s deliverative and forensic speaking as exemplified by Operation Honesty and U.S. v. Duane Pope

Analýza integrovaných softwarových systémů pro řízení spolehlivosti a údržby

Import 18/02/2009Prezenční638 - Katedra automatizace a počítačové techniky v metalurgiiNeuveden

Finanční analýza společnosti Pivovary Staropramen a.s.

Práce je rozdělena do dvou hlavních celků: teoretická část a aplikační část. V první části se zabývám popisem finanční analýzy jako celku. V druhé části aplikuji popsané postupy a metody na společnosti Pivovary Staropramen a.s. Cílem mé práce je zhodnotit finanční zdraví společnosti v letech 2002-2005 z pohledu externího uživatele