19 research outputs found
Fathers in neonatal units: improving infant health by supporting the baby-father bond and mother-father co-parenting.
The Family Initiativeâs International Neonatal Fathers Working Group, whose members are the authors of this paper, has reviewed the literature on engaging fathers in neonatal units, with the aim of making recommendations for improving experience of fathers as well as health outcomes in neonatal practice. We believe that supporting the fatherbaby bond and supporting co-parenting between the mother and the father benefits the health of the baby, for example, improved weight gain and oxygen saturation and enhanced rates of breastfeeding. We find, however, that despite much interest in engaging with parents as full partners in the care of their baby, engaging fathers remains suboptimal. Fathers typically describe the opportunity to bond with their babies, particularly skin-to-skin care, in glowing terms of gratitude, happiness and love. These sensations are underpinned by hormonal and neurobiological changes that take place in fathers when they care for their babies, as also happens with mothers. Fathers, however, are subject to different social expectations from mothers and this shapes how they respond to the situation and how neonatal staff treats them. Fathers are more likely to be considered responsible for earning, they are often considered to be less competent at caring than mothers and they are expected to be âthe strong oneâ, providing support to mothers but not expecting it in return. Our review ends with 12 practical recommendations for neonatal teams to focus on: (1) assess the needs of mother and father individually, (2) consider individual needs and wants in family care plans, (3) ensure complete flexibility of access to the neonatal unit for fathers, (4) gear parenting education towards co-parenting, (5) actively promote father-baby bonding, (6) be attentive to fathers hiding their stress, (7) inform fathers directly not just via the mother, (8) facilitate peer-to-peer communication for fathers, (9) differentiate and analyse by gender in service evaluations, (10) train staff to work with fathers and to support co-parenting, (11) develop a father-friendly audit tool for neonatal units, and (12) organise an international consultation to update guidelines for neonatal care, including those of UNICEF
Conceptualizing the change process in Sudano-Sahelian landscapes:land use and land cover dynamics in forest reserves and their margins
Development of a Web-Based Health Care Intervention for Patients With Heart Disease: Lessons Learned From a Participatory Design Study
Causes of discrepancies between medications listed in the national electronic prescribing system and patients' actual use of medications
High-throughput rat brain PET imaging and automatic spatial normalization of the dopamine D2/3 receptor ligand [F-18]fallypride
Early response evaluation and CEA response in patients treated in a Danish randomized study comparing trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) with or without bevazicumab in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
The Danish Fetal Medicine Database:establishment, organization and quality assessment of the first trimester screening program for trisomy 21 in Denmark 2008-2012
ENDOGENOUS CLEARANCE RATE AND SYNTHESIS OF ALPHAFOETOPROTEIN DURING AND AFTER BLOOD EXCHANGE TRANSFUSION IN HYPERBILIRUBINAEMIC NEWBORNS
How might patient involvement in healthcare quality improvement efforts workâA realist literature review
Introduction This realist literature review, regarding active patient involvement in healthcare quality improvement (QI), seeks to identify possible mechanisms that contribute to success or failure. Furthermore, the paper outlines key considerations for organising and supporting patient involvement in healthcare QI efforts. Â Methods Two literature searches were performed. Altogether, 1,204 articles from a healthcare context were screened, focusing on improvement efforts that involve patients, healthcare professionals and/or managers and leaders. Among these, 107 articles fulfilled the chosen study selection criteria and were further analysed. 18 articles underwent a full realist review. In the realist synthesis, context-mechanism-outcome configurations were articulated as middle-range theories and organised thematically to generate a program theory on how active patient involvement in QI efforts might work. Â Results The articles exhibited a diversity of patient involvement approaches at different levels of healthcare organisations. To be successful, organisationsâ support of QI efforts that actively involved patients tailored the QI efforts to their context to achieve the desired outcomes, and involved the relevant microsystem members. Furthermore, it promoted interaction and partnership within the microsystem, and supported the behavioural change that follows. Conclusion This realist synthesis generates a program theory for active patient involvement in QI efforts; active patient involvement can be a tool (resource), if tailored for interaction and partnership (reasoning), that leads to behaviour change (outcome) within healthcare QI efforts. The theory explains essential resource and reasoning mechanisms, and outcomes that together form guidance for healthcare organisations when managing active patient involvement in QI efforts