DMD Genotypes and Motor Function in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Multi-institution Meta-analysis With Implications for Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials of genotype-targeted treatments in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) traditionally compare treated patients to untreated patients with the same DMD genotype class. This avoids confounding of drug efficacy by genotype effects but also shrinks the pool of eligible controls, increasing challenges for trial enrollment in this already rare disease. To evaluate the suitability of genotypically unmatched controls in DMD, we quantified effects of genotype class on 1-year changes in motor function endpoints used in clinical trials. METHODS: Over 1,600 patient-years of follow-up (>700 patients) were studied from six real-world/natural history data sources (UZ Leuven, PRO-DMD-01 shared by CureDuchenne, iMDEX, North Star UK, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, and the DMD Italian Group), with genotypes classified as amenable to skipping exons 44, 45, 51 or 53, other skippable, nonsense, and other mutations. Associations between genotype class and 1-year changes in North Star Ambulatory Assessment total score (ΔNSAA) and in 10-meter walk/run velocity (Δ10MWR) were studied in each data source with and without adjustment for baseline prognostic factors. RESULTS: The studied genotype classes accounted for approximately 2% of variation in ΔNSAA outcomes after 12 months, whereas other prognostic factors explained >30% of variation in large data sources. Based on a meta-analysis across all data sources, pooled effect estimates for the studied skip-amenable mutation classes were all small in magnitude (<2 units in ΔNSAA total score in 1-year follow up), smaller than clinically important differences in NSAA, and were precisely estimated with standard errors <1 unit after adjusting for non-genotypic prognostic factors. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest viability of trial designs incorporating genotypically mixed or unmatched controls for up to 12 months in duration for motor function outcomes, which would ease recruitment challenges and reduce numbers of patients assigned to placebos. Such trial designs, including multi-genotype platform trials and hybrid designs, should ensure baseline balance between treatment and control groups for the most important prognostic factors, while accounting for small remaining genotype effects quantified in the present study

Moving Beyond the 2018 Minimum International Care Considerations for Osteoporosis Management in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)

Individuals living with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are at significant risk of bone fragility due to osteoporosis, with the most potent drivers of fragility fractures in this context stemming from the aggressive myopathy and long term oral glucocorticoid therapy. Young people with DMD have a high fracture burden, with reported total and vertebral fracture rates that are four [1, 2] and 535 times [1] higher than those of healthy growing boys, respectively. Vertebral fractures can occur as early as six months following daily glucocorticoid initiation [3]. Up to 75% of young people with DMD sustain at least one fracture after eight years of glucocorticoid therapy [4]. Fractures in DMD can lead to devastating outcomes, including steeper rates of functional decline, premature and permanent loss of ambulation, chronic pain, and even death from fat embolism syndrome or adrenal crisis following long bone fractures [2, 5–8]. The potential for serious consequences and medical complications linked to fractures has driven efforts to develop effective guidelines for timely bone health surveillance and treatment with more recent efforts to develop fracture prevention strategies.To guide clinicians in the management of DMD and its related co-morbidities (including skeletal health), the first internationally-endorsed, minimum standards of care were published in 2010 under the moniker “Clinical Care Considerations” [9, 10]. This document recommends that osteoporosis monitoring include spine x-rays if back pain or kyphosis is present, followed by initiation of intravenous bisphosphonate therapy if vertebral fractures are identified [10]. In the years following the inaugural 2010 Clinical Care Considerations, studies were published showing that vertebral fractures, a key manifestation of bone fragility among children and adults living with glucorticoid-treated chronic conditions, were frequently asymptomatic, necessitating routine surveillance for early detection [3, 11]. It was also better appreciated that even a single long bone fracture can signal osteoporosis in a persistently high-risk setting such as DMD, and prompt initiation of bone protection therapy is important.With this new knowledge, the latest international, minimum standards of clinical care for DMD published in 2018, known as Care Considerations [12–14], recommended routine, standardized spine imaging for early detection of vertebral fractures, combined with more timely bone-targeted (bisphosphonate) intervention in the presence of vertebral or low trauma long bone fractures [12]. At the same time, the ever-changing therapeutic landscape for the treatment of the underlying condition calls for ongoing examination of the intimate relationship between muscle and bone development in DMD, including the effect of different DMD treatment approaches on the skeletal and endocrine systems. The overall goal of such focus is to harvest discussions about optimal management that will foster bone strength and prevent fractures in this high-risk setting across all underlying disease-targeted treatment paradigms for people with DMD

Moving beyond the 2018 minimum international care considerations for osteoporosis management in duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD): Meeting report from the 3rd International Muscle-Bone Interactions Meeting 7th and 14th November 2022

This current manuscript summarizes the proceedings of the “Third Muscle-bone interactions in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Symposium: Moving Beyond the 2018 Minimum International Standards of Care for Osteoporosis Management”, an event co-organized by the World Duchenne Organization (www.worldduchenne.org) and the International Conference on Children’s Bone Health (www.theiscbh.org). This virtual symposium, held on November 7th and 14th 2022, brought together a total of 385 delegates representing 55 countries registered for the symposium, which included 239 clinicians, 70 researchers, 40 patient representatives and others from pharmaceutical companies and regulators. This symposium aimed to review the evidence base that informed the 2018 international minimum Care Considerations, best practices for implementation of these Care Considerations, and emerging knowledge that has arisen from research since the 2018 Care Considerations that shines light on the path forward. The online symposium and this report cover the following areas: 1. Current understanding of the bone morbidity in DMD, especially in relation to conventional glucocorticoid therapy. 2. The published, 2018 minimum international Care Considerations for osteoporosis monitoring and management in DMD. 3. Real world initiatives and challenges in the implementation of the 2018 minimum international Care Considerations for osteoporosis monitoring and management in DMD. 4. The need to consider strategies to move beyond the 2018 minimum international Care Considerations to prevent first fractures in DMD. 5. New therapies in DMD with potential impact on skeletal outcomes

Real-world and natural history data for drug evaluation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: suitability of the North Star Ambulatory Assessment for comparisons with external controls

Using external controls based on real-world or natural history data (RWD/NHD) for drug evaluations in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is appealing given the challenges of enrolling placebo-controlled trials, especially for multi-year trials. Comparisons to external controls, however, face risks of bias due to differences in outcomes between trial and RWD/NHD settings. To assess this bias empirically, we conducted a multi-institution study comparing mean 48-week changes in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) total score between trial placebo arms and RWD/NHD sources, with and without adjustment for baseline prognostic factors. Analyses used data from three placebo arms (235 48-week intervals, N = 235 patients) and three RWD/NHD sources (348 intervals, N = 202 patients). Differences in mean ΔNSAA between placebo arms and RWD/NHD sources were small before adjustment (-1.2 units, 95% CI: [-2.0 -0.5]) and were attenuated and no longer statistically significant after adjustment (0.1 units (95% CI: [-0.6, 0.8]). Results were similar whether adjusting using multivariable regression or propensity score matching. This consistency in ΔNSAA between trial placebo arms and RWD/NHD sources accords with prior findings for the six-minute walk distance, provides a well-validated framework for baseline adjustment of prognostic factors, and supports the suitability of RWD/NHD external controls for drug evaluations in ambulatory DMD

Stakeholder cooperation to overcome challenges in orphan medicine development: The example of Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a rare, progressive, muscle-wasting disease leading to severe disability and premature death. Treatment is currently symptomatic, but several experimental therapies are in development. Implemented care standards, validated outcome measures correlating with clinical benefit, and comprehensive information about the natural history of the disease are essential for regulatory approval of any treatment. However, for Duchenne muscular dystrophy and other rare diseases, these requirements are not always in place when potential therapies enter the clinical trial phase. A cooperative effort of stakeholders in Duchenne muscular dystrophy-including representatives from patients' groups, academia, industry, and regulatory agencies-is aimed at addressing this shortfall by identifying strategies to overcome challenges, developing the tools needed, and collecting relevant data. An open and constructive dialogue among European stakeholders has positively affected development of treatments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy; this approach could serve as a paradigm for development of treatments for rare diseases in general

Determining minimal clinically important differences in the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

The North Star ambulatory assessment (NSAA) is a functional motor outcome measure in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), widely used in clinical trials and natural history studies, as well as in clinical practice. However, little has been reported on the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the NSAA. The lack of established MCID estimates for NSAA presents challenges in interpreting the significance of the results of this outcome measure in clinical trials, natural history studies and clinical practice. Combining statistical approaches and patient perspectives, this study estimated MCID for NSAA using distribution-based estimates of 1/3 standard deviation (SD) and standard error of measurement (SEM), an anchor-based approach, with six-minute walk distance (6MWD) as the anchor, and evaluation of patient and parent perception using participant-tailored questionnaires. The MCID for NSAA in boys with DMD aged 7 to 10 years based on 1/3 SD ranged from 2.3-2.9 points, and that on SEM ranged from 2.9-3.5 points. Anchored on the 6MWD, the MCID for NSAA was estimated as 3.5 points. When the impact on functional abilities was considered using participant response questionnaires, patients and parent perceived a complete loss of function in a single item or deterioration of function in one to two items of the assessment as an important change. Our study examines MCID estimates for total NSAA scores using multiple approaches, including the impact of patient and parent perspective on within scale changes in items based on complete loss of function and deterioration of function, and provides new insight on evaluation of differences in these widely used outcome measure in DMD

Downregulation of miRNA-29, -23 and -21 in urine of Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients

AIM: To study the signature of 87 urinary miRNAs in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients, select the most dysregulated and determine statistically significant differences in their expression between controls, ambulant (A) and nonambulant (NA) DMD patients, and patients on different corticosteroid regimens. Patients/materials & methods: Urine was collected from control (n = 20), A (n = 31) and NA (n = 23) DMD patients. miRNA expression was measured by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. RESULTS: miR-29c-3p was significantly downregulated in A DMD patients while miR-23b-3p and miR-21-5p were significantly downregulated in NA DMD patients compared with age-matched controls. CONCLUSION: miR-29c-3p, miR-23b-3p and miR-21-5p are promising novel noninvasive biomarkers for DMD, and miR-29c-3p levels are differentially affected by different steroid regimens, supporting the antifibrotic effect of steroid therapy

Incidence and outcome of acquired demyelinating syndromes in Dutch children: update of a nationwide and prospective study

Introduction: Acquired demyelinating syndromes (ADS) are immune-mediated demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system in children. A nationwide, multicentre and prospective cohort study was initiated in the Netherlands in 2006, with a reported ADS incidence of 0.66/100,000 per year and MS incidence of 0.15/100,000 per year in the period between 2007 and 2010. In this study, we provide an update on the incidence and the long-term follow-up of ADS in the Netherlands. Methods: Children < 18 years with a first attack of demyelination were included consecutively from January 2006 to December 2016. Diagnoses were based on the International Paediatric MS study group consensus criteria. Outcome data were collected by neurological and neuropsychological assessments, and telephone call assessments. Results: Between 2011 and 2016, 55/165 of the ADS patients were diagnosed with MS (33%). This resulted in an increased ADS and MS incidence of 0.80/100,000 per year and 0.26/100,000 per year, respectively. Since 2006 a total of 243 ADS patients have been included. During follow-up (median 55 months, IQR 28–84), 137 patients were diagnosed with monophasic disease (56%), 89 with MS (37%) and 17 with multiphasic disease other than MS (7%). At least one form of residual deficit including cognitive impairment was observed in 69% of all ADS patients, even in monophasic ADS. An Expanded Disability Status Scale score of ≥ 5.5 was reached in 3/89 MS patients (3%). Conclusion: The reported incidence of ADS in Dutch children has increased since 2010. Residual deficits are common in this group, even in monophasic patients. Therefore, long-term follow-up in ADS patients is warranted