Metal and precursor effect during 1-heptyne selective hydrogenation using an activated carbon as support

Palladium, platinum, and ruthenium supported on activated carbon were used as catalysts for the selective hydrogenation of 1-heptyne, a terminal alkyne. All catalysts were characterized by temperature programmed reduction, X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. TPR and XPS suggest that the metal in all catalysts is reduced after the pretreatment with H2 at 673 K. The TPR trace of the PdNRX catalyst shows that the support surface groups are greatly modified as a consequence of the use of HNO3 during the catalyst preparation. During the hydrogenation of 1-heptyne, both palladium catalysts were more active and selective than the platinum and ruthenium catalysts. The activity order of the catalysts is as follows: PdClRX > PdNRX > PtClRX ≫ RuClRX. This superior performance of PdClRX was attributed in part to the total occupancy of the d electronic levels of the Pd metal that is supposed to promote the rupture of the H2 bond during the hydrogenation reaction. The activity differences between PdClRX and PdNRX catalysts could be attributed to a better accessibility of the substrate to the active sites, as a consequence of steric and electronic effects of the superficial support groups. The order for the selectivity to 1-heptene is as follows: PdClRX = PdNRX > RuClRX > PtClRX, and it can be mainly attributed to thermodynamic effects.UNL and CONICET

Genetic inhibition of flowering differs between juvenile and adult Citrus trees

[EN] Background and Aims In woody species, the juvenile period maintains the axillary meristems in a vegetative stage, unable to flower, for several years. However, in adult trees, some 1-year-old meristems flower whereas others remain vegetative to ensure a polycarpic growth habit. Both types of trees, therefore, have non-flowering meristems, and we hypothesize that the molecular mechanism regulating flower inhibition in juvenile trees is different from that in adult trees. Methods In adult Citrus trees, the main endogenous factor inhibiting flower induction is the growing fruit. Thus, we studied the expression of the main flowering time, identity and patterning genes of trees with heavy fruit load (not-flowering adult trees) compared to that of 6-month-old trees (not-flowering juvenile trees). Adult trees without fruits (flowering trees) were used as a control. Second, we studied the expression of the same genes in the meristems of 6-month, and 1-, 3-, 5-and 7-year-old juvenile trees compared to 10-year-old flowering trees. Key Results The axillary meristems of juvenile trees are unable to transcribe flowering time and patterning genes during the period of induction, although they are able to transcribe the FLOWERING LOCUS T citrus orthologue (CiFT2) in leaves. By contrast, meristems of not-flowering adult trees are able to transcribe the flowering network genes but fail to achieve the transcription threshold required to flower, due to CiFT2 repression by the fruit. Juvenile meristems progressively achieve gene expression, with age-dependent differences from 6 months to 7 years, FD-like and CsLFY being the last genes to be expressed. Conclusions During the juvenile period the mechanism inhibiting flowering is determined in the immature bud, so that it progressively acquires flowering ability at the gene expression level of the flowering time programme, whereas in the adult tree it is determined in the leaf, where repression of CiFT2 gene expression occurs.We thank Cristina Ferrandiz (IBMCP-UPV, Spain) and Fernando Andres (UMR AGAP, France) for useful comments on the manuscript. We thank D. Westall for her help in editing the manuscript. This work was supported by a grant from the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Spain (RTA2013-0024-C02-02)Muñoz Fambuena, N.; Nicolas-Almansa, M.; Martinez Fuentes, A.; Reig Valor, C.; Iglesias, DJ.; Primo-Millo, E.; Mesejo Conejos, C.... (2019). Genetic inhibition of flowering differs between juvenile and adult Citrus trees. Annals of Botany. 123(3):483-490. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcy179S4834901233Abe, M. (2005). FD, a bZIP Protein Mediating Signals from the Floral Pathway Integrator FT at the Shoot Apex. Science, 309(5737), 1052-1056. doi:10.1126/science.1115983Albani, M. C., & Coupland, G. (2010). Comparative Analysis of Flowering in Annual and Perennial Plants. Plant Development, 323-348. doi:10.1016/s0070-2153(10)91011-9Andrés, F., & Coupland, G. (2012). The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nature Reviews Genetics, 13(9), 627-639. doi:10.1038/nrg3291Balanzà, V., Martínez-Fernández, I., Sato, S., Yanofsky, M. F., Kaufmann, K., Angenent, G. C., … Ferrándiz, C. (2018). Genetic control of meristem arrest and life span in Arabidopsis by a FRUITFULL-APETALA2 pathway. Nature Communications, 9(1). doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03067-5Bäurle, I., & Dean, C. (2006). The Timing of Developmental Transitions in Plants. Cell, 125(4), 655-664. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.005Betancourt, M., Sistachs, V., Martínez-Fuentes, A., Mesejo, C., Reig, C., & Agustí, M. (2014). Influence of harvest date on fruit yield and return bloom in ‘Marsh’ grapefruit trees (Citrus paradisiMacf.) grown under a tropical climate. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 89(4), 435-440. doi:10.1080/14620316.2014.11513103Blázquez, M. A., Ferrándiz, C., Madueño, F., & Parcy, F. (2006). How Floral Meristems are Built. Plant Molecular Biology, 60(6), 855-870. doi:10.1007/s11103-006-0013-zBlümel, M., Dally, N., & Jung, C. (2015). Flowering time regulation in crops — what did we learn from Arabidopsis? Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 32, 121-129. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2014.11.023Castillo, M.-C., Forment, J., Gadea, J., Carrasco, J. L., Juarez, J., Navarro, L., & Ancillo, G. (2013). Identification of transcription factors potentially involved in the juvenile to adult phase transition in Citrus. Annals of Botany, 112(7), 1371-1381. doi:10.1093/aob/mct211Chica, E. J., & Albrigo, L. G. (2013). Expression of Flower Promoting Genes in Sweet Orange during Floral Inductive Water Deficits. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 138(2), 88-94. doi:10.21273/jashs.138.2.88Endo, T., Shimada, T., Fujii, H., Kobayashi, Y., Araki, T., & Omura, M. (2005). Ectopic Expression of an FT Homolog from Citrus Confers an Early Flowering Phenotype on Trifoliate Orange (Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.). Transgenic Research, 14(5), 703-712. doi:10.1007/s11248-005-6632-3Haberman, A., Ackerman, M., Crane, O., Kelner, J.-J., Costes, E., & Samach, A. (2016). Different flowering response to various fruit loads in apple cultivars correlates with degree of transcript reaccumulation of a TFL1-encoding gene. The Plant Journal, 87(2), 161-173. doi:10.1111/tpj.13190Hanano, S., & Goto, K. (2011). Arabidopsis TERMINAL FLOWER1 Is Involved in the Regulation of Flowering Time and Inflorescence Development through Transcriptional Repression. The Plant Cell, 23(9), 3172-3184. doi:10.1105/tpc.111.088641Mafra, V., Kubo, K. S., Alves-Ferreira, M., Ribeiro-Alves, M., Stuart, R. M., Boava, L. P., … Machado, M. A. (2012). Reference Genes for Accurate Transcript Normalization in Citrus Genotypes under Different Experimental Conditions. PLoS ONE, 7(2), e31263. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031263Martínez-Fuentes, A., Mesejo, C., Reig, C., & Agustí, M. (2010). Timing of the inhibitory effect of fruit on return bloom of ‘Valencia’ sweet orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 90(11), 1936-1943. doi:10.1002/jsfa.4038Michaels, S. D., & Amasino, R. M. (1999). FLOWERING LOCUS C Encodes a Novel MADS Domain Protein That Acts as a Repressor of Flowering. The Plant Cell, 11(5), 949-956. doi:10.1105/tpc.11.5.949Muñoz-Fambuena, N., Mesejo, C., Carmen González-Mas, M., Primo-Millo, E., Agustí, M., & Iglesias, D. J. (2011). Fruit regulates seasonal expression of flowering genes in alternate-bearing ‘Moncada’ mandarin. Annals of Botany, 108(3), 511-519. doi:10.1093/aob/mcr164Muñoz-Fambuena, N., Mesejo, C., González-Mas, M. C., Primo-Millo, E., Agustí, M., & Iglesias, D. J. (2012). Fruit load modulates flowering-related gene expression in buds of alternate-bearing ‘Moncada’ mandarin. Annals of Botany, 110(6), 1109-1118. doi:10.1093/aob/mcs190Nishikawa, F., Endo, T., Shimada, T., Fujii, H., Shimizu, T., Omura, M., & Ikoma, Y. (2007). Increased CiFT abundance in the stem correlates with floral induction by low temperature in Satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.). Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(14), 3915-3927. doi:10.1093/jxb/erm246Peña, L., Martín-Trillo, M., Juárez, J., Pina, J. A., Navarro, L., & Martínez-Zapater, J. M. (2001). Constitutive expression of Arabidopsis LEAFY or APETALA1 genes in citrus reduces their generation time. Nature Biotechnology, 19(3), 263-267. doi:10.1038/85719Pillitteri, L. J., Lovatt, C. J., & Walling, L. L. (2004). Isolation and Characterization of a TERMINAL FLOWER Homolog and Its Correlation with Juvenility in Citrus. Plant Physiology, 135(3), 1540-1551. doi:10.1104/pp.103.036178Seo, E., Lee, H., Jeon, J., Park, H., Kim, J., Noh, Y.-S., & Lee, I. (2009). Crosstalk between Cold Response and Flowering in Arabidopsis Is Mediated through the Flowering-Time Gene SOC1 and Its Upstream Negative Regulator FLC. The Plant Cell, 21(10), 3185-3197. doi:10.1105/tpc.108.063883Sgamma, T., Jackson, A., Muleo, R., Thomas, B., & Massiah, A. (2014). TEMPRANILLO is a regulator of juvenility in plants. Scientific Reports, 4(1). doi:10.1038/srep03704Shalom, L., Samuels, S., Zur, N., Shlizerman, L., Zemach, H., Weissberg, M., … Sadka, A. (2012). Alternate Bearing in Citrus: Changes in the Expression of Flowering Control Genes and in Global Gene Expression in ON- versus OFF-Crop Trees. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e46930. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046930Shalom, L., Samuels, S., Zur, N., Shlizerman, L., Doron-Faigenboim, A., Blumwald, E., & Sadka, A. (2014). Fruit load induces changes in global gene expression and in abscisic acid (ABA) and indole acetic acid (IAA) homeostasis in citrus buds. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65(12), 3029-3044. doi:10.1093/jxb/eru148Sohn, E. J., Rojas-Pierce, M., Pan, S., Carter, C., Serrano-Mislata, A., Madueno, F., … Raikhel, N. V. (2007). The shoot meristem identity gene TFL1 is involved in flower development and trafficking to the protein storage vacuole. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(47), 18801-18806. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708236104Spiegel-Roy, P., & Goldschmidt, E. E. (1996). The Biology of Citrus. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511600548Sussmilch, F. C., Berbel, A., Hecht, V., Vander Schoor, J. K., Ferrándiz, C., Madueño, F., & Weller, J. L. (2015). Pea VEGETATIVE2 Is an FD Homolog That Is Essential for Flowering and Compound Inflorescence Development. The Plant Cell, 27(4), 1046-1060. doi:10.1105/tpc.115.136150Tan, F.-C., & Swain, S. M. (2007). Functional characterization of AP3, SOC1 and WUS homologues from citrus (Citrus sinensis). Physiologia Plantarum, 131(3), 481-495. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00971.xLeal Valentim, F., Mourik, S. van, Posé, D., Kim, M. C., Schmid, M., van Ham, R. C. H. J., … van Dijk, A. D. J. (2015). A Quantitative and Dynamic Model of the Arabidopsis Flowering Time Gene Regulatory Network. PLOS ONE, 10(2), e0116973. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116973Wang, J.-W., Czech, B., & Weigel, D. (2009). miR156-Regulated SPL Transcription Factors Define an Endogenous Flowering Pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell, 138(4), 738-749. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.014Weigel, D. (1995). The Genetics of Flower Development: From Floral Induction to Ovule Morphogenesis. Annual Review of Genetics, 29(1), 19-39. doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.00031