7 research outputs found
A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the impact of indoor living space on dairy cow production, reproduction and behaviour
As a global society, we have a duty to provide suitable care and conditions for farmed livestock to protect animal welfare and ensure the sustainability of our food supply. The suitability and biological impacts of housing conditions for intensively farmed animals is a complex and emotive subject, yet poorly researched, meaning quantitative evidence to inform policy and legislation is lacking. Most dairy cows globally are housed for some duration during the year, largely when climatic conditions are unfavourable. However, the impact on biology, productivity and welfare of even the most basic housing requirement, the quantity of living space, remains unknown. We conducted a long-term (1-year), randomised controlled trial (CONSORT 10 guidelines) to investigate the impact of increased living space (6.5m2 vs 3m2 per animal) on critical aspects of cow biology, behaviour and productivity. Adult Holstein dairy cows (n = 150) were continuously and randomly allocated to a high or control living space group with all other aspects of housing remaining identical between groups. Compared to cows in the control living space group, cows with increased space produced more milk per 305d lactation (primiparous: 12,235L vs 11,592L, P < 0.01; multiparous: 14,746L vs 14,644L, P < 0.01) but took longer to become pregnant after calving (primiparous: 155d vs 83d, P = 0.025; multiparous: 133d vs 109d). In terms of behaviour, cows with more living space spent significantly more time in lying areas (65min/d difference; high space group: 12.43h/day, 95% CI = 11.70-13.29; control space group: 11.42h/day, 95% CI = 10.73-12.12) and significantly less time in passageways (64min/d), suggesting enhanced welfare when more space was provided. A key physiological difference between groups was that cows with more space spent longer ruminating each day. This is the first long term study in dairy cows to demonstrate that increased living space results in meaningful benefits in terms of productivity and behaviour and suggests that the interplay between farmed animals and their housed environment plays an important role in the concepts of welfare and sustainability of dairy farming
The applied development of a tiered multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme for Dichelobacter nodosus
Dichelobacter nodosus (D. nodosus) is the causative pathogen of ovine footrot, a disease that has a significant welfare and financial impact on the global sheep industry. Previous studies into the phylogenetics of D. nodosus have focused on Australia and Scandinavia, meaning the current diversity in the United Kingdom (U.K.) population and its relationship globally, is poorly understood. Numerous epidemiological methods are available for bacterial typing; however, few account for whole genome diversity or provide the opportunity for future application of new computational techniques. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) measures nucleotide variations within several loci with slow accumulation of variation to enable the designation of allele numbers to determine a sequence type. The usage of whole genome sequence data enables the application of MLST, but also core and whole genome MLST for higher levels of strain discrimination with a negligible increase in experimental cost. An MLST database was developed alongside a seven loci scheme using publically available whole genome data from the sequence read archive. Sequence type designation and strain discrimination was compared to previously published data to ensure reproducibility. Multiple D. nodosus isolates from U.K. farms were directly compared to populations from other countries. The U.K. isolates define new clades within the global population of D. nodosus and predominantly consist of serogroups A, B and H, however serogroups C, D, E, and I were also found. Thescheme is publically available at https://pubmlst.org/dnodosus/
Predicting lameness in dairy cattle using untargeted liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry-based metabolomics and machine learning
ABSTRACT: Lameness in dairy cattle is a highly prevalent condition that impacts on the health and welfare of dairy cows. Prompt detection and implementation of effective treatment is important for managing lameness. However, major limitations are associated with visual assessment of lameness, which is the most commonly used method to detect lameness. The aims of this study were to investigate the use of metabolomics and machine learning to develop novel methods to detect lameness. Untargeted metabolomics using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) alongside machine learning models and a stability selection method were utilized to evaluate the predictive accuracy of differences in the metabolomics profile of first-lactation dairy cows before (during the transition period) and at the time of lameness (based on visual assessment using the 0–3 scale of the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board). Urine samples were collected from 2 cohorts of dairy heifers and stored at −86°C before analysis using LC-MS. Cohort 1 (n = 90) cows were recruited as current first-lactation cows with weekly mobility scores recorded over a 4-mo timeframe, from which newly lame and nonlame cows were identified. Cohort 2 (n = 30) cows were recruited within 3 wk before calving, and lameness events (based on mobility score) were recorded through lactation until a minimum of 70 d in milk (DIM). All cows were matched paired by DIM ± 14 d. The median DIM at lameness identification was 187.5 and 28.5 for cohort 1 and 2, respectively. The best performing machine learning models predicted lameness at the time of lameness with an accuracy of between 81 and 82%. Using stability selection, the prediction accuracy at the time of lameness was 80 to 81%. For samples collected before and after calving, the best performing machine learning model predicted lameness with an accuracy of 71 and 75%, respectively. The findings from this study demonstrate that untargeted LC-MS profiling combined with machine learning methods can be used to predict lameness as early as before calving and before observable changes in gait in first-lactation dairy cows. The methods also provide accuracies for detecting lameness at the time of observable changes in gait of up to 82%. The findings demonstrate that these methods could provide substantial advancements in the early prediction and prevention of lameness risk. Further external validation work is required to confirm these findings are generalizable; however, this study provides the basis from which future work can be conducted
Table1.docx
<p>Dichelobacter nodosus (D. nodosus) is the causative pathogen of ovine footrot, a disease that has a significant welfare and financial impact on the global sheep industry. Previous studies into the phylogenetics of D. nodosus have focused on Australia and Scandinavia, meaning the current diversity in the United Kingdom (U.K.) population and its relationship globally, is poorly understood. Numerous epidemiological methods are available for bacterial typing; however, few account for whole genome diversity or provide the opportunity for future application of new computational techniques. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) measures nucleotide variations within several loci with slow accumulation of variation to enable the designation of allele numbers to determine a sequence type. The usage of whole genome sequence data enables the application of MLST, but also core and whole genome MLST for higher levels of strain discrimination with a negligible increase in experimental cost. An MLST database was developed alongside a seven loci scheme using publically available whole genome data from the sequence read archive. Sequence type designation and strain discrimination was compared to previously published data to ensure reproducibility. Multiple D. nodosus isolates from U.K. farms were directly compared to populations from other countries. The U.K. isolates define new clades within the global population of D. nodosus and predominantly consist of serogroups A, B and H, however serogroups C, D, E, and I were also found. The scheme is publically available at https://pubmlst.org/dnodosus/.</p