27 research outputs found

    ECMO for COVID-19 patients in Europe and Israel

    Get PDF
    Since March 15th, 2020, 177 centres from Europe and Israel have joined the study, routinely reporting on the ECMO support they provide to COVID-19 patients. The mean annual number of cases treated with ECMO in the participating centres before the pandemic (2019) was 55. The number of COVID-19 patients has increased rapidly each week reaching 1531 treated patients as of September 14th. The greatest number of cases has been reported from France (n = 385), UK (n = 193), Germany (n = 176), Spain (n = 166), and Italy (n = 136) .The mean age of treated patients was 52.6 years (range 16–80), 79% were male. The ECMO configuration used was VV in 91% of cases, VA in 5% and other in 4%. The mean PaO2 before ECMO implantation was 65 mmHg. The mean duration of ECMO support thus far has been 18 days and the mean ICU length of stay of these patients was 33 days. As of the 14th September, overall 841 patients have been weaned from ECMO support, 601 died during ECMO support, 71 died after withdrawal of ECMO, 79 are still receiving ECMO support and for 10 patients status n.a. . Our preliminary data suggest that patients placed on ECMO with severe refractory respiratory or cardiac failure secondary to COVID-19 have a reasonable (55%) chance of survival. Further extensive data analysis is expected to provide invaluable information on the demographics, severity of illness, indications and different ECMO management strategies in these patients

    Pulse oximetry and high-dose vasopressors: a comparison between forehead reflectance and finger transmission sensors.

    No full text
    International audiencePURPOSE: Pulse oximetry (SpO(2)) measured at finger site via transmission mode may fail in situations of hypoperfusion. Forehead sensors using reflectance technology might be useful in these circumstances. We hypothesized that reflectance SpO(2) would be more accurate than finger SpO(2) in patients with severe shock. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in an intensive care unit of a university hospital of patients in shock who were treated with high norepinephrine and/or epinephrine doses (≥0.1 μg kg(-1) min(-1)). When blood gas determinations were requested, forehead SpO(2) and finger SpO(2) values were simultaneous recorded. Agreement between SpO(2) measurements with arterial saturation (SaO(2)), obtained by blood analysis with a co-oximeter, was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. The number of outliers, defined by the formula SaO(2) - SpO(2) > ±3 %, indicated the proportion of measurements considered to be clinically unacceptable. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the study. With the forehead sensor no reading failure occurred, and 140 paired data sets (forehead SpO(2) vs. SaO(2)) were obtained. Bias and precision were +1.0 and +2.5 %, respectively, and the limits of agreement ranged from -4.0 to 6.0 %. The finger sensor failed to give a value in four cases, thus providing 136 paired data sets (finger SpO(2) vs. SaO(2)) for analysis. Bias and precision were +1.4 and +4.8 %, respectively, and the limits of agreement ranged from -8.0 to 10.9 %. There were 21 (15 %) outliers for the forehead sensor and 43 (32 %) for the finger sensor (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Forehead SpO(2) measurements were more accurate than finger SpO(2) when compared with SaO(2) in critically ill patients requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy and should therefore be the preferred method considered

    Irradiation to Improve the Response to Immunotherapeutic Agents in Glioblastomas.

    Get PDF
    peer reviewedPURPOSE: Glioblastoma (GBM) remains an incurable disease despite extensive treatment with surgical resection, irradiation, and temozolomide. In line with many other forms of aggressive cancers, GBM is currently under consideration as a target for immunotherapy. However, GBM tends to be nonimmunogenic and exhibits a microenvironment with few or no effector T cells, a relatively low nonsynonymous somatic mutational load, and a low predicted neoantigen burden. GBM also exploits a multitude of immunosuppressive strategies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A number of immunotherapeutic approaches have been tested with disappointing results. A rationale exists to combine immunotherapy and radiation therapy, which can induce an immunogenic form of cell death with T-cell activation and tumor infiltration. RESULTS: Various immunotherapy agents, including immune checkpoint modulators, transforming growth factor beta receptor inhibitors, and indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase inhibitors, have been evaluated with irradiation in preclinical GBM models, with promising results, and are being further tested in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: This review aims to present the basic rationale behind this emerging complementary therapeutic approach in GBM, appraise the current preclinical and clinical data, and discuss the future challenges in improving the antitumor immune response

    Mortality due to hospital-acquired infection after cardiac surgery

    No full text
    Perioperative ManagementInternational audiencePurpose: Hospital-acquired infections have been associated with significant morbidity and mortality in critically ill surgical patients. However, little is known about mortality due to hospital-acquired infections in cardiac surgery.Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the cardiac surgery unit of a university hospital. All patients who underwent cardiac surgery over a 7-year period were included. Patients with hospital-acquired infections were matched 1:1 with patients with nonhospital-acquired infections based on risk factors for hospital-acquired infections and death after cardiac surgery using propensity score matching. We performed a competitive risk analysis to study the mortality fraction due to hospital-acquired infections.Results: Of 8853 patients who underwent cardiac surgery, 370 (4.2%) developed 500 postoperative infections (incidence density rate 4.2 hospital-acquired infections per 1000 patient-days). Crude hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients with hospital-acquired infections than in matched patients who did not develop hospital-acquired infections, 15.4% and 5.7%, respectively (P < .001). The in-hospital mortality fraction due to hospital-acquired infections in our cohort was 17.1% (12.3%-22.8%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection (hazard ratio, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-3.49; P = .005), bloodstream infection (hazard ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-3.63; P = .010), and pneumonia (hazard ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.77; P = .04) were each independently associated with increased hospital mortality.Conclusions: Although hospital-acquired infections are relatively uncommon after cardiac surgery (4.2%), these infections have a major impact on postoperative mortality (attributable mortality fraction, 17.1%)
    corecore