Lung Cancer in Peru

Peru is a South American nation with a growing and aging population of 31 million people with a life expectancy at birth of 76.7 years. The country is divided into 25 regions, 79% of the population is urban, and Lima, the capital, concentrates more than a third of the population.1 Although Peru is an upper-middle-income country, health expenditure represents only 5.1% of the gross domestic product, which is lower than the average of Latin America and the Caribbean (LATAM) (8.56%).2 Out-of-pocket health expenditure is 30.9%.3 Peru has a comprehensive National Cancer Plan and two population-based cancer registries in Lima and Arequipa.Revisión por pare

Association between Ancestry-Specific 6q25 Variants and Breast Cancer Subtypes in Peruvian Women

Background: Breast cancer incidence in the United States is lower in Hispanic/Latina (H/L) compared with African American/ Black or Non-Hispanic White women. An Indigenous American breast cancer-protective germline variant (rs140068132) has been reported near the estrogen receptor 1 gene. This study tests the association of rs140068132 and other polymorphisms in the 6q25 region with subtype-specific breast cancer risk in H/Ls of high Indigenous American ancestry. Methods: Genotypes were obtained for 5,094 Peruvian women with (1,755) and without (3,337) breast cancer. Associations between genotype and overall and subtype-specific risk for the protective variant were tested using logistic regression models and conditional analyses, including other risk-associated polymorphisms in the region. Results: We replicated the reported association between rs140068132 and breast cancer risk overall [odds ratio (OR), 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.47-0.59], as well as the lower odds of developing hormone receptor negative (HR-) versus HR+ disease (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.97). Models, including HER2, showed further heterogeneity with reduced odds for HR+HER2+ (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92), HR-HER2+ (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.90) and HR-HER2- (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.56-1.05) compared with HR+HER2-. Inclusion of other risk-associated variants did not change these observations. Conclusions: The rs140068132 polymorphism is associated with decreased risk of breast cancer in Peruvians and is more protective against HR- and HER2+ diseases independently of other breast cancer-associated variants in the 6q25 region. Impact: These results could inform functional analyses to understand the mechanism by which rs140068132-G reduces risk of breast cancer development in a subtype-specific manner. They also illustrate the importance of including diverse individuals in genetic studies.National Institutes of HealthRevisión por pare

Diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer de mama HER2+: Guía de Práctica Clínica de la Sociedad Peruana de Cancerología

Introduction. In Peru, breast cancer represents the most common type of cancer in women and the sixth most lethal type of cancer in the general population. Overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2 +) occurs in 20% to 30% of breast cancers, and is associated with more aggressive tumors, with greater recurrence and greater mortality. Objective. Prepare a set of evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of HER2 + breast cancer, in order to help reduce mortality, disease progression and improve quality of life. Methods. A panel of clinical specialists and methodologists was formed, who identified relevant clinical questions about the diagnosis and treatment of HER2 + breast cancer. A systematic search for CPGs was carried out in Medline (PubMed), and in developing and compiling agencies. For the formulation of recommendations, the panel of specialists discussed the evidence and elements of the context of implementation of the recommendation, following the methodology proposed by the Ministry of Health of Peru. Results. Nine clinical questions were prioritized. A total of 25 clinical recommendations were made. Conclusions. An evidence-based CPG was developed through a systematic, rigorous and transparent process developed by a multidisciplinary team.Introducción. En Perú, el cáncer de mama representa el tipo de cáncer más frecuente en mujeres y el sexto tipo de cáncer más letal en la población general. La sobreexpresión del receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico (HER2+) ocurre en 20% a 30% de los cánceres de mama, y se asocia con tumores más agresivos, con mayor recurrencia y mayor mortalidad. Objetivo. Elaborar un conjunto de recomendaciones basadas en evidencias para el diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer de mama HER2+, con la finalidad de contribuir a reducir la mortalidad, progresión de la enfermedad y mejorar la calidad de vida. Métodos. Se conformó un panel de especialistas clínicos y metodólogos, quienes identificaron preguntas clínicas relevantes sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer de mama HER2+. Se desarrolló una búsqueda sistemática de GPC en Medline (PubMed), y en organismos elaboradores y recopiladores. Para la formulación de recomendaciones, el panel de especialistas discutió la evidencia y elementos del contexto de implementación de la recomendación, siguiendo la metodología propuesta por el Ministerio de Salud del Perú. Resultados. Se priorizó nueve preguntas clínicas. Se formuló un total de 25 recomendaciones clínicas. Conclusiones. Se elaboró una GPC basada en evidencias, a través de un proceso sistemático, riguroso y transparente desarrollado por un equipo multidisciplinario.&nbsp

Combination of everolimus with trastuzumab plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (BOLERO-1) : a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial

BACKGROUND : mTOR inhibition has been shown to reverse trastuzumab resistance from hyperactivated the PIK/AKT/mTOR pathway due to PTEN loss, by sensitizing PTEN-deficient tumors towards trastuzumab. The BOLERO-1 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of adding everolimus to trastuzumab and paclitaxel as first-line therapy for HER2+ advanced breast cancer (ABC). METHODS : In this phase III, randomized, double-blind trial, patients were enrolled across 141 sites in 28 countries. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age, with locally assessed HER2+ advanced breast cancer (ABC), with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, who had not received prior trastuzumab or chemotherapy for ABC, had measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors or bone lesions in the absence of measurable disease, without prior systemic therapy for advanced disease except endocrine therapy. The patients were randomized 2:1 (with an interactive voice and web response system) to receive either daily everolimus (10 mg/day) orally or placebo plus weekly trastuzumab intravenously at 4 mg/kg loading dose on Day-1 with subsequent weekly doses of 2 mg/kg of each 4-week cycle plus paclitaxel intravenously at a dose of 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 4- week cycle. Randomization was stratified according to prior use of trastuzumab and visceral metastasis. Patients and investigators were blinded to the assigned treatments. Identity of experimental treatments was concealed by use of everolimus and placebo that were identical in packaging, labelling, appearance, and administration schedule. The two primary objectives were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) in the full study population and in the subset of patients with hormone receptor-negative (HR) breast cancer at baseline; the latter was added during the course of the study, prior to unblinding based on new clinical and biological findings from other studies. All efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population. Enrolment for this trial is closed and results of the final PFS analyses are presented here. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00876395. FINDINGS : Between 10-Sep-2009 and 16-Dec-2012, 719 patients were randomized to receive everolimus (n=480) or placebo (n=239). Median follow-up was 41.3 months (IQR: 35.4 – 46.6 months). INTERPRETATION : The primary objective in the full population was not met; median PFS was 15.0 months with everolimus vs 14.5 months with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.73-1.08; p=0.1166). In the HR subpopulation (n=311), median PFS with everolimus was 20.3 months vs 13.1 months with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.91; p=0.0049), however, the protocol-specified statistical significance threshold (p=0.0044) was not crossed. The most common adverse events (AEs) with everolimus vs placebo were stomatitis (314 [66.5%] vs 77 [32.4%] patients), diarrhea (267 [56.6%] vs 111 [46.6%] patients), and alopecia (221 [46.8%] vs 125 [52.5%]). The most frequently reported grade 3/4 AEs in the EVE arm vs PBO arm were neutropenia (117 [24.8%] of 472 patients vs 35 [14.7%] of 238 patients), stomatitis (59 [12.5%] of 472 patients vs 3 [1.3%] of 238 patients), anemia (46 [9.7%] of 472 patients vs 6 [2.5%] of 238 patients) and diarrhea (43 [9.1%] of 472 patients vs 10 [4.2%] of 238 patients) On-treatment AE-related deaths were reported in 17 [3.6%] vs 0% of patients respectively.Interpretation: The primary objective of PFS was not met. However, consistent with the preliminary observations from BOLERO-3, everolimus prolonged median PFS by 7.2 months in patients with HR, HER2+ ABC, which warrants further investigation. The safety profile was generally consistent with what was previously reported in BOLERO-3. Proactive monitoring and early management of AEs in patients treated with everolimus and chemotherapy is critical..Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.http://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-lancet-oncology2016-07-31hb201

Addition of amifostine to the CHOP regimen in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase II trial showing reduction in toxicity without altering long-term survival

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We report the 8-year follow-up of 34 patients aged≥69 years old with NHL included in a phase IIb open-label randomized parallel groups study to evaluate the effectiveness of amifostine in preventing the toxicity of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP regime) . PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive classical CHOP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/ m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 [maximum 2 mg] on day 1 and prednisone 100 mg/day for 5 days) or CHOP plus amifostine (6 cycles of amifostine 910 mg/m2 on day 1). Efficacy (time to progression, TTP; disease-free survival, DFS; overall survival, OS) and toxicity endpoints were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were randomized to A-CHOP (n=18) or CHOP (n=16). Patients with A-CHOP vs CHOP had significantly lower toxicity; neutropenia grade 4 ocurred in 13/92 (13%) vs 23/85 (27%, P=0.007) cycles, febrile neutropenia in 3/92 A-CHOP (3%) vs 8/85 (10%, P=.056) CHOP cycles, hospitalization for toxicity in 4/92 (4%) A-CHOP vs 11/85 (13%, P=.05) CHOP cycles. Median hospitalization stay for toxicity was 5 days with A-CHOP vs 8 days with CHOP (P=.05). There were no significant differences at 8 years in TTP (A-CHOP, 48.9% vs CHOP, 36.3%; P=.65), DFS (A-CHOP, 72.9% vs CHOP 55.6%; P=.50) and OS (A-CHOP, 44.3% vs CHOP, 54.4%). There was no long-term toxicity of clinical interest. The only prognostic factor identified to 8 years was the International Prognostic Index (IPI low/low intermediate risk vs high intermediate/high risk; HR=2.98; CI 95%:1.01-8.77; P=.048). CONCLUSION: These results show that amifostine can be added to the standard CHOP treatment schedule with less acute toxicity and without influencing the outcome

PIK3CA mutations in Peruvian patients with HER2-amplified and triple negative non-metastatic breast cancers

Purpose: To determine the frequency of PIK3CA mutations in a Peruvian cohort with HER2-amplified and triple negative breast cancers (TNBC). Methods: We analyzed two cohorts of 134 primary non-metastatic breast cancer patients from Peru. Cohorts consisted of 51 hormone receptors (+)/HER2-amplified breast tumor patients surgically resected as first treatment included in the ALTTO trial (ALTTO cohort) and 81 TNBC patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment (neoadjuvant cohort). Genomic DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tumor samples. Samples from the ALTTO and neoadjuvant cohorts were taken at biopsies and from residual tumors, respectively. PIK3CA mutations were detected by sequencing DNA fragments obtained by PCR amplification of exons and their flanking introns. All of the detected PIK3CA mutations were confirmed in a second independent run of sample testing. Results: PIK3CA mutations were present in 21/134 cases (15.7%). Mutations in exon 9 and 20 were present in 10/134 (7.5%) and 11/134 (8.2%), respectively. No cases had mutations in both exons. Mutations in exon 9 consisted of E545A (seven cases), E545K (two cases) and E545Q (one case); while in exon 20, mutations consisted of H1047R (10 cases) and H1047L (one case). Compared to TNBC patients, HER2-amplified patients were more likely to have PIK3CA mutated (23% vs 9.6%; P = 0.034). There were no associations between mutational status of PIK3CA with estrogen receptor status (P = 0.731), progesterone receptor status (P = 0.921), age (P = 0.646), nodal status (P = 0.240) or histological grade (P = 1.00). No significant associations were found between PIK3CA mutational status and clinicopathological features. Conclusions: We found a similar frequency of PIK3CA mutations to that reported in other series. Although we did not include HR+/HER2 patients, those with HER2-amplified tumors were more likely to present PIK3CA mutations compared to patients with triple negative tumors. Keywords: Breast cancer, PIK3CA, HER2, Triple negativ

Prognostic effect of hormone receptor status in early HER2 positive breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine the prognostic effect hormone receptor (HR) status in early HER2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer patients, since it has not yet been established whether HR status can be used in the prognosis of patients with (HER2+) breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We obtained data from 299 patients with early HER2+ breast cancer who underwent surgery and received standard adjuvant chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and/or radiation between 2000 and 2002 at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Peru. Clinical and pathological features were compared. Endpoints analyzed were disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Overall, 155 patients were HR− positive (HR+) and 144 were negative (HR−). The two groups had similar characteristics except for histologic grade and extracapsular extension. With a median follow-up of 93 months, 5-year DFS was statistically different between the two groups: 65.0% for (HER2+/ HR−) and 74.6% for the (HER2+/ HR+) patients (P=.045). OS at 5 years was not statistically different between the two groups with 75.5% for (HER2+/ HR−) patients and 82.4% for the (HER2+/ HR+)(P=.140). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with (HER2+/ HR−) breast cancers treated with surgery and standard adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a statistically worse DFS compared to those with (HER2+/ HR+) tumors. However, OS was similar in both groups