35 research outputs found
Imported and travelling dogs as carriers of canine vector-borne pathogens in Germany
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>With the import of pets and pets taken abroad, arthropod-borne diseases have increased in frequency in German veterinary practices. This is reflected by 4,681 dogs that have been either travelled to or relocated from endemic areas to Germany. The case history of these dogs and the laboratory findings have been compared with samples collected from 331 dogs living in an endemic area in Portugal. The various pathogens and the seroprevalences were examined to determine the occurrence of, and thus infection risk, for vector-borne pathogens in popular travel destinations.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>4,681 dogs were examined serological for <it>Leishmania infantum, Babesia canis </it>and <it>Ehrlichia canis</it>. Buffy coats were detected for <it>Hepatozoon canis </it>and blood samples were examined for microfilariae via the Knott's test. The samples were sent in from animal welfare organizations or private persons via veterinary clinics. Upon individual requests, dogs were additionally examined serological for <it>Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi </it>and <it>Rickettsia conorii</it>. Overall <it>B. canis </it>was the most prevalent pathogen detected by antibody titers (23.4%), followed by <it>L. infantum </it>(12.2%) and <it>E. canis </it>(10.1%). Microfilariae were detected in 7.7% and <it>H. canis </it>in 2.7% of the examined dogs. In 332/1862 dogs <it>A. phagocytophilum</it>, in 64/212 <it>B. burgdorferi </it>and in 20/58 <it>R. conorii </it>was detected. Of the 4,681 dogs, in total 4,226 were imported to Germany from endemic areas. Eighty seven dogs joined their owners for a vacation abroad. In comparison to the laboratory data from Germany, we examined 331 dogs from Portugal. The prevalence of antibodies/pathogens we detected was: 62.8% to <it>R. conorii</it>, 58% to <it>B. canis</it>, 30.5% to <it>A. phagocytophilum</it>, 24.8% to <it>E. canis</it>, 21.1% to <it>H. canis </it>(via PCR), 9.1% to <it>L. infantum </it>and 5.3% to microfilariae.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The examination of 4,681 dogs living in Germany showed pathogens like <it>L. infantum </it>that are non-endemic in Germany. Furthermore, the German data are similar in terms of multiple pathogen infection to the data recorded for dogs from Portugal. Based on these findings the importation of dogs from endemic predominantly Mediterranean regions to Germany as well as travelling with dogs to these regions carries a significant risk of acquiring an infection. Thus we would conclude that pet owners seek advice of the veterinarians prior to importing a dog from an endemic area or travel to such areas. In general, it might be advisable to have a European recording system for translocation of dogs.</p
Antibody ratios against NS1 antigens of tick‐borne encephalitis and West Nile viruses support differential flavivirus serology in dogs
Flavivirus diagnostics are complicated by substantial cross-reactivity of antibodies between different flavivirus species. This is of particular importance in regions with multiple endemic flaviviruses in co-circulation. Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is the causative agent of tick-borne encephalitis, the most common infection of the central nervous system in endemic regions of Europe and Asia. Since 2018, the related West Nile virus (WNV) has spread to Germany where its geographic distribution overlaps with TBEV endemic regions. Besides humans, various animal species are susceptible to TBEV and WNV infection. To compare antibody responses against these flaviviruses and test for cross-reactivity, we developed a multi-species luciferase immunoprecipitation system antibody detection assay for several different antigens. We performed a serosurvey of 682 dogs from five different European countries to detect antibodies against TBEV and WNV. Twelve specimens were positive for TBEV NS1 only and seven for WNV NS1 only. Two specimens were reactive to both NS1 antigens and another two were equivocal for WNV NS1. Interestingly, 89.5% of positive specimens had TBEV/WNV or WNV/TBEV signal ratios of 10 to >300 between individual NS1 antigens, allowing for a clear distinction between the two viruses. The remaining 10.5% of reactive specimens showed a 5 to 10-fold difference between the two viruses and included possible dual exposures to both viruses. In contrast, equivocal samples showed low signal ratios between the NS1 antigens, suggesting unspecific reactivity. Based on this data, we found the NS1 protein to be a suitable antigen to distinguish between TBEV and WNV-specific antibodies in dogs with sensitivity and specificity similar to virus neutralization tests
First evidence of vertical Hepatozoon canis transmission in dogs in Europe
Background
Hepatozoon canis is a protozoal agent that is known to be transmitted by oral uptake of H. canis-infected Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato ticks in dogs. Vertical transmission of H. canis has only been described once in a study evaluating dogs from Japan. The aim of this study was to investigate the parasitological status of puppies from a bitch that had tested positive for Hepatozoon spp. prior to giving birth.
Findings
A 4-year-old, female, pregnant dog imported from Italy (Sardinia) to Germany showed clinical signs of lethargy and tachypnoea and tested positive for H. canis by PCR. The dog gave birth to eight puppies, one of which was stillborn and another that had to be reanimated. Haematology, buffy coat analysis and a biochemistry profile were performed for each dog. EDTA-blood of the surviving seven puppies and bone marrow, liver, spleen, amniotic fluid, and umbilical cord of the stillborn puppy was tested for the presence of Hepatozoon spp. by PCR.
The mother and the seven surviving puppies tested positive for H. canis by PCR at day 62 post-partum. Gamonts were detected in all dogs by buffy coat evaluation. Haematological and biochemistry results revealed mild abnormalities. In the stillborn puppy, spleen, umbilical cord, and amniotic fluid were positive for H. canis.
Conclusion
The results confirm that vertical transmission is a possible route of H. canis infection in dogs, demonstrated by molecular detection of the pathogen in the stillborn puppy. In the seven surviving puppies, vertical transmission was the most likely transmission route. A potential impact of the level of parasitaemia on the health of puppies, as well as its pathogenesis, should be investigated further
Combining climatic projections and dispersal ability: A method for estimating the responses of sandfly vector species to climate change
Abstract Background: In the Old World, sandfly species of the genus Phlebotomus are known vectors of Leishmania, Bartonella and several viruses. Recent sandfly catches and autochthonous cases of leishmaniasis hint on spreading tendencies of the vectors towards Central Europe. However, studies addressing potential future distribution of sandflies in the light of a changing European climate are missing
First report of venereal and vertical transmission of canine leishmaniosis from naturally infected dogs in Germany
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Canine leishmaniosis (CanL) is a zoonotic disease caused by <it>Leishmania (L.) infantum</it>. It is endemic to several tropical and subtropical countries but also to the Mediterranean region. It is transmitted by phlebotomine sandflies but occasional non-vector transmissions have been reported, including vertical and horizontal transmission.</p> <p>Findings</p> <p>The authors report a case of CanL in a female boxer dog from Dusseldorf, Germany, that had never been in an endemic region. A serum sample from the bitch was tested positive for antibodies against <it>Leishmania </it>(IFAT 1:2,000, ELISA 72). The bitch had whelped three litters, and one puppy from the third litter was also found to be seropositive for <it>Leishmania </it>antibodies (IFAT 1:4,000, ELISA 78).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Up to now, despite intensive searching, the occurrence of sandflies could not be proved in the bitch's region of origin. Thus, vertical and horizontal transmission are to be discussed as possible ways of infection. This may be the first report of venereal and vertical transmission of <it>L. infantum </it>in naturally infected dogs in Germany.</p
Malaria transmission in non-endemic areas: case report, review of the literature and implications for public health management
In non-endemic areas, malaria is rare and locally acquired infections, particularly with Plasmodium falciparum, are exceptional events. The diagnosis is, therefore, likely to be delayed or missed in patients without a relevant travel history. This report describes a case of falciparum malaria in Berlin, Germany, in a patient who had not been to an endemic area for more than a decade. Potential routes of vector-related and direct transmission were evaluated, particularly with regard to a possible danger to the public. A review of the literature was conducted regarding possible routes of transmission and their probability assessed. Genotyping of parasite isolates of this and another patient with malaria admitted 16 days before revealed homology between the two strains. In a local entomological survey, anopheline vectors on the hospital grounds as well as in the residential area of both patients were found. Despite intensive investigations, the mode of transmission remained obscure. In this context, possible routes of vector-borne and direct occupational/accidental transmission in a major European city are reviewed and discussed, providing information and guidance in case other similar events occur elsewhere. Examples for investigations and measures to be taken in such a situation are provided. When local malaria transmission within a large non-immune population cannot be ruled out, genotyping of parasite isolates, local entomological surveys, preparedness for secondary cases, expert consultations in a multidisciplinary team and careful information management are essential. Malaria acquired in non-endemic areas remains an unlikely, but possible event for which awareness needs to be maintained
recommendations from the CVBD World Forum
The human-animal bond has been a fundamental feature of mankind's history for
millennia. The first, and strongest of these, man's relationship with the dog,
is believed to pre-date even agriculture, going back as far as 30,000 years.
It remains at least as powerful today. Fed by the changing nature of the
interactions between people and their dogs worldwide and the increasing
tendency towards close domesticity, the health of dogs has never played a more
important role in family life. Thanks to developments in scientific
understanding and diagnostic techniques, as well as changing priorities of pet
owners, veterinarians are now able, and indeed expected, to play a fundamental
role in the prevention and treatment of canine disease, including canine
vector-borne diseases (CVBDs).The CVBDs represent a varied and complex group
of diseases, including anaplasmosis, babesiosis, bartonellosis, borreliosis,
dirofilariosis, ehrlichiosis, leishmaniosis, rickettsiosis and thelaziosis,
with new syndromes being uncovered every year. Many of these diseases can
cause serious, even life-threatening clinical conditions in dogs, with a
number having zoonotic potential, affecting the human population.Today, CVBDs
pose a growing global threat as they continue their spread far from their
traditional geographical and temporal restraints as a result of changes in
both climatic conditions and pet dog travel patterns, exposing new populations
to previously unknown infectious agents and posing unprecedented challenges to
veterinarians.In response to this growing threat, the CVBD World Forum, a
multidisciplinary group of experts in CVBDs from around the world which meets
on an annual basis, gathered in Nice (France) in 2011 to share the latest
research on CVBDs and discuss the best approaches to managing these diseases
around the world.As a result of these discussions, we, the members of the CVBD
Forum have developed the following recommendations to veterinarians for the
management of CVBDs
First report of transmission of canine leishmaniosis through bite wounds from a naturally infected dog in Germany
Vector-borne and other pathogens of potential relevance disseminated by relocated cats
© 2022. The Author(s).Large populations of unowned cats constitute an animal welfare, ecological, societal and public health issue worldwide. Their relocation and homing are currently carried out in many parts of the world with the intention of relieving suffering and social problems, while contributing to ethical and humane population control in these cat populations. An understanding of an individual cat's lifestyle and disease status by veterinary team professionals and those working with cat charities can help to prevent severe cat stress and the spread of feline pathogens, especially vector-borne pathogens, which can be overlooked in cats. In this article, we discuss the issue of relocation and homing of unowned cats from a global perspective. We also review zoonotic and non-zoonotic infectious agents of cats and give a list of practical recommendations for veterinary team professionals dealing with homing cats. Finally, we present a consensus statement consolidated at the 15th Symposium of the Companion Vector-Borne Diseases (CVBD) World Forum in 2020, ultimately to help veterinary team professionals understand the problem and the role they have in helping to prevent and manage vector-borne and other pathogens in relocated cats.publishersversionpublishe
