10 research outputs found
Stress-induced O-GlcNAcylation: an adaptive process of injured cells
In the 30 years, since the discovery of nucleocytoplasmic glycosylation, O-GlcNAc has been implicated in regulating cellular processes as diverse as protein folding, localization, degradation, activity, post-translational modifications, and interactions. The cell co-ordinates these molecular events, on thousands of cellular proteins, in concert with environmental and physiological cues to fine-tune epigenetics, transcription, translation, signal transduction, cell cycle, and metabolism. The cellular stress response is no exception: diverse forms of injury result in dynamic changes to the O-GlcNAc subproteome that promote survival. In this review, we discuss the biosynthesis of O-GlcNAc, the mechanisms by which O-GlcNAc promotes cytoprotection, and the clinical significance of these data
Recommended from our members
Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neoplasia: a multicenter North American experience.
Background and aims âRectal lesions traditionally represent the first lesions approached during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) training in the West. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of rectal ESD in North America. Methods âThis is a multicenter retrospective analysis of rectal ESD between January 2010 and September 2018 in 15 centers. End points included: rates of en bloc resection, R0 resection, adverse events, comparison of pre- and post-ESD histology, and factors associated with failed resection. Results âIn total, 171 patients (median age 63 years; 56â% men) underwent rectal ESD (median size 43âmm). En bloc resection was achieved in 141 cases (82.5â%; 95â%CI 76.8-88.2), including 24 of 27 (88.9â%) with prior failed endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). R0 resection rate was 74.9â% (95â%CI 68.4-81.4). Post-ESD bleeding and perforation occurred in 4 (2.3â%) and 7 (4.1â%), respectively. Covert submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC) was identified in 8.6â% of post-ESD specimens. There was one case (1/120; 0.8â%) of recurrence at a median follow-up of 31 weeks; IQR: 19-76 weeks). Older age and higher body mass index (BMI) were predictors of failed R0 resection, whereas submucosal fibrosis was associated with a higher likelihood of both failed en bloc and R0 resection. Conclusion âRectal ESD in North America is safe and is associated with high en bloc and R0 resection rates. The presence of submucosal fibrosis was the main predictor of failed en bloc and R0 resection. ESD can be considered for select rectal lesions, and serves not only to establish a definitive tissue diagnosis but also to provide curative resection for lesions with covert advanced disease
Trends and Outcomes of Cardiac Transplantation in the Lowest Urgency Candidates
Background Because of discrepancies between donor supply and recipient demand, the cardiac transplantation process aims to prioritize the most medically urgent patients. It remains unknown how recipients with the lowest medical urgency compare to others in the allocation process. We aimed to examine differences in clinical characteristics, organ allocation patterns, and outcomes between cardiac transplantation candidates with the lowest and highest medical urgency. Methods and Results We performed a retrospective analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Patients listed for cardiac transplantation between January 2011 and May 2020 were stratified according to status at time of transplantation. Baseline recipient and donor characteristics, waitlist survival, and posttransplantation outcomes were compared in the years before and after the 2018 allocation system change. Lower urgency patients in the old system were older (58.5 versus 56Â years) and more likely female (54.4% versus 23.8%) compared with the highest urgency patients, and these trends persisted in the new system (P<0.001, all). Donors for the lowest urgency patients were more likely older, female, or have a history of cytomegalovirus, hepatitis C, or diabetes (P<0.01, all). The lowest urgency patients had longer waitlist times and under the new allocation system received organs from shorter distances with decreased ischemic times (178Â miles versus 269Â miles, 3.1 versus 3.5Â hours; P<0.001, all). There was no difference in posttransplantation survival (P<0.01, all). Conclusions Patients transplanted as lower urgency receive hearts from donors with additional comorbidities compared with higher urgency patients, but outcomes are similar at 1Â year