33 research outputs found

    Frequency and Course of Mild Cognitive Impairment in a Multiethnic Community

    Get PDF
    Objective To examine incidence rates and antecedents of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) among diverse elders without dementia at the initial visit, and to examine the characteristics of elders with MCI who reverted to normal on follow-up examination. Methods A total of 2,364 Caribbean Hispanic, black, or non-Hispanic white subjects, aged 65 or older, who were free of dementia at initial evaluation were followed up every 18 to 24 months. Incidence rate of MCI and AD was determined by examination of neurological, medical, psychiatric, and neuropsychological function. Results Over 10,517 person-years, 21% of normal elderly subjects progressed to MCI (annual incidence rate, 5.1%; 95% confidence interval, 4.6–5.6%). Of those with MCI initially, 21.8% were subsequently diagnosed with AD (annual incidence rate, 5.4%; 95% confidence interval, 4.7–6.3%), 47% remained unchanged, and 31% reverted to normal. Those with MCI were 2.8 times more likely to experience development of AD than normal elderly subjects. MCI with impairment in memory and at least one other cognitive domain was associated with greatest risk for progression to AD and was also least likely to revert to normal at follow-up. Consistent diagnosis of MCI or incident probable or possible AD was 60% sensitive and 94% specific for the pathological diagnosis of AD. Interpretation Impaired memory and language were useful predictors of transition to AD. Reversion to normal from MCI was frequent, but those with impairment in more than one cognitive domain were more likely to progress or remain impaired than those with single-domain impairment. Clinical diagnosis of MCI does not always predict AD neuropathology. Ann Neurol 200

    Novel CSF biomarkers to discriminate FTLD and its pathological subtypes

    Get PDF
    Objective: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is the second most prevalent dementia in young patients and is characterized by the presence of two main protein aggregates in the brain, tau (FTLD-Tau) or TDP43 (FTLD-TDP), which likely require distinct pharmacological therapy. However, specific diagnosis of FTLD and its subtypes remains challenging due to largely overlapping clinical phenotypes. Here, we aimed to assess the clinical performance of novel cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for discrimination of FTLD and its pathological subtypes. Methods: YKL40, FABP4, MFG-E8, and the activities of catalase and specific lysosomal enzymes were analyzed in patients with FTLD-TDP (n\ua0=\ua030), FTLD-Tau (n\ua0=\ua020), AD (n\ua0=\ua030), DLB (n\ua0=\ua029), and nondemented controls (n\ua0=\ua029) obtained from two different centers. Models were validated in an independent CSF cohort (n\ua0=\ua0188). Results: YKL40 and catalase activity were increased in FTLD-TDP cases compared to controls. YKL40 levels were also higher in FTLD-TDP compared to FTLD-Tau. We identified biomarker models able to discriminate FTLD from nondemented controls (MFG-E8, tTau, and A\u3b242; 78% sensitivity and 83% specificity) and non-FTLD dementia (YKL40, pTau, p/tTau ratio, and age; 90% sensitivity, 78% specificity), which were validated in an independent cohort. In addition, we identified a biomarker model differentiating FTLD-TDP from FTLD-Tau (YKL40, MFGE-8, \u3b2HexA together with \u3b2HexA/tHex and p/tTau ratios and age) with 80% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Interpretation: This study identifies CSF protein signatures distinguishing FTLD and the two main pathological subtypes with optimal accuracy (specificity/sensitivity\ua0>\ua080%). Validation of these models may allow appropriate selection of cases for clinical trials targeting the accumulation of Tau or TDP43, thereby increasing their efficiency and facilitating the development of successful therapies
    corecore