12 research outputs found
Fig. 4 in Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology
Fig. 4. Eudiaptomus vulgaris (Schmeil, 1898), male. a – habitus, lateral view; b – ultimate segments of right antennule; c – leg 5; d – right leg 5 (coxa and basis) and left leg 5; e – rostrum. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (a), 200 µm (c), 300 µm (b), 50 µm (d, e).Published as part of <i>Podshivalina, V.N., Sheveleva, N.G., Semenova, A.S. & Mirabdullayev, I.M., 2022, Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology, pp. 42-54 in Zoosystematica Rossica 31 (1)</i> on page 50, DOI: 10.31610/zsr/2022.31.1.42, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10124251">http://zenodo.org/record/10124251</a>
Fig. 1 in Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology
Fig. 1. Eudiaptomus transylvanicus (Daday, 1891), female. a – habitus, lateral view; b – genital compound somite; c, c′ – mandible; d – rostrum; e – endopod of leg 2, with Schmeilsche lobus; f – leg 5; g – exopods 2 and 3 of leg 5; h – endopod of leg 5. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (a), 200 µm (b), 50 µm (c, e), 40 µm (d, g), 10 µm (c′, f, h).Published as part of <i>Podshivalina, V.N., Sheveleva, N.G., Semenova, A.S. & Mirabdullayev, I.M., 2022, Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology, pp. 42-54 in Zoosystematica Rossica 31 (1)</i> on page 45, DOI: 10.31610/zsr/2022.31.1.42, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10124251">http://zenodo.org/record/10124251</a>
Fig. 3 in Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology
Fig. 3. Eudiaptomus vulgaris (Schmeil, 1898), female. a – habitus, ventral view; b – genital compound somite; c – rostrum; d – mandible; e – coxa of leg 5; f – exopod 1 and endopod of leg 5; g – leg 5; h – exopods 2 and 3 of leg 5; i – endopod of leg 2, with Schmeilsche lobus. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (a), 100 µm (b), 50 µm (c, e, f, g, h, i), 20 µm (d).Published as part of <i>Podshivalina, V.N., Sheveleva, N.G., Semenova, A.S. & Mirabdullayev, I.M., 2022, Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology, pp. 42-54 in Zoosystematica Rossica 31 (1)</i> on page 48, DOI: 10.31610/zsr/2022.31.1.42, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10124251">http://zenodo.org/record/10124251</a>
Fig. 2 in Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology
Fig. 2. Eudiaptomus transylvanicus (Daday, 1891), male. a – habitus, ventral view; b, b′ – right antennule; c – rostrum; d – leg 5; e – basis of right leg 5; f – exopod 2 of right leg 5; g – endopod of right leg 5; h – exopod 2 of left leg 5. Scale bars: 500 µm (a), 200 µm (b), 100 µm (b′, c, d), 40 µm (e), 30 µm (f), 20 µm (g, h).Published as part of <i>Podshivalina, V.N., Sheveleva, N.G., Semenova, A.S. & Mirabdullayev, I.M., 2022, Eudiaptomus transylvanicus and E. vulgaris (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae): comparative morphology, distribution and ecology, pp. 42-54 in Zoosystematica Rossica 31 (1)</i> on page 46, DOI: 10.31610/zsr/2022.31.1.42, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10124251">http://zenodo.org/record/10124251</a>
Prospects for crop production under drought:research priorities and future directions
The efficient use of water supplies requires a systems approach that encompasses all aspects of making water available and its use within society that must recognise global issues. Increasing the efficiency of water use within agricultural systems is an essential priority in many regions including the Mediterranean. This review examines the research priorities, the prospects for crop and soil management and plant breeding and biotechnology that are needed to achieve high stable yield under drought in the Mediterranean. Research must combine the latest genomics resources including quantitative genetics, genomics and biomathematics with an ecophysiological understanding of the interactions between crop plant genotypes and the growing environment to better inform crop improvement