The impact of hybrid capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling on treatment strategies in patients with solid tumors

Objective: The development of bioinformatics and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has provided insights into the ap-plicability and functionality of the genomic alterations (GA). In this study, we evaluated the impact of CGP on the treatment plan and outcomes in a significant number of patients. Material and Methods: We carried out a retrospective case-control study on 164 adult patients with advanced solid tumors from 15 oncology centers in Türkiye. Results: In all cases, CGP was performed within 23.8 [standard deviation (SD)±32.1] months of initial diagnosis. Non-small cell lung carcinoma, breast cancer, unknown primary carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, and sarcoma were among the most common tumor types, accounting for 61.5% of all cases. CGP was performed immediately after the diagnosis of advanced cancer in 13 patients (7.9%). In 158 patients (96.4%), at least one GA was found as per the CGP report. Also, in the reports, the average tumor mutational burden (TMB) and GAs were 7.3 (SD±8.7) mut/Mb and 3.5 (SD±2.0), respectively. According to CGP reports, 58 patients had 79 evidence-based drug suggestions for their particular tumor type, whereas 97 patients had 153 evidence-based drug suggestions for another tumor type. After the primary oncologist interpreted the CGP reports, significant changes were made to the treatment of 35 (21.3%) patients. Conclusion: We strongly believe that in the future, high-TMB or other tumor-agnostic biomarkers will become much more afford-able, and CGP will serve as one of the major decision-making tools for the treatment of patients along with pathological, radiological or lab-oratory tests

Caspian: Os Results from a Randomised Phase 3 Study of First-Line Durvalumab ± Tremelimumab + Chemotherapy in ES-SCLC

Immune checkpoint blockade targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) has demonstrated improved clinical outcomes in patients (pts) with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Durvalumab ± Tremelimumab in combination with etoposide and platinum-based CT (EP) as first-line treatment for pts with ES-SCLC. Results will be presented at WCLC 2019 including OS, key secondary endpoints, safety and tolerability

Patient-reported outcomes with first-line durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): a randomized, controlled, open-label, phase III study

Objectives In the phase III CASPIAN study, first-line durvalumab plus etoposide in combination with either cisplatin or carboplatin (EP) significantly improved overall survival (primary endpoint) versus EP alone in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) at the interim analysis. Here we report patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Materials and methods Treatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC received 4 cycles of durvalumab plus EP every 3 weeks followed by maintenance durvalumab every 4 weeks until progression, or up to 6 cycles of EP every 3 weeks. PROs, assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) version 3 and its lung cancer module, the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ-LC13), were prespecified secondary endpoints. Changes from baseline to disease progression or 12 months in prespecified key disease-related symptoms (cough, dyspnea, chest pain, fatigue, appetite loss) were analyzed with a mixed model for repeated measures. Time to deterioration (TTD) of symptoms, functioning, and global health status/quality of life (QoL) from randomization was analyzed. Results In the durvalumab plus EP and EP arms, 261 and 260 patients were PRO-evaluable. Patients in both arms experienced numerically reduced symptom burden over 12 months or until progression for key symptoms. For the improvements from baseline in appetite loss, the between-arm difference was statistically significant, favoring durvalumab plus EP (difference, −4.5; 99% CI: −9.04, −0.04; nominal p = 0.009). Patients experienced longer TTD with durvalumab plus EP versus EP for all symptoms (hazard ratio [95% CI] for key symptoms: cough 0.78 [0.600‒1.026]; dyspnea 0.79 [0.625‒1.006]; chest pain 0.76 [0.575‒0.996]; fatigue 0.82 [0.653‒1.027]; appetite loss 0.70 [0.542‒0.899]), functioning, and global health status/QoL. Conclusion Addition of durvalumab to first-line EP maintained QoL and delayed worsening of patient-reported symptoms, functioning, and global health status/QoL compared with EP

Role of the antiangiogenetic drug paclitaxel on healing of intestinal anastomosis: An experimental study

Background: The aim of intraperitoneal administration of antineoplastic agents is the prevention of the implantation of tumoral cells after surgical intervention or the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. The efficiency of intraperitoneal administration of paclitaxel, which is also an antiangiogenetic agent, has been investigated recently. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate, taking into consideration its antiangiogenetic properties, the effects of intraperitoneal paclitaxel on healing of end to end colonic anastomosis. Methods: 42 rats were allocated to 2 main groups (n=21 for each group) to be evaluated on postperative day 3 (group A) and postoperative day 7 (group B). Each of the two main groups was divided into 3 subgroups (7 rats each). These subgroups were determined as control and two treatment groups administered paclitaxel in a dose of 2.5 mg/kg and 3.5 mg/kg intraperitoneally. Anastomosed segments of colon were harvested on postoperative day 3 or 7 and evaluated to determine bursting pressure of anastomoses, hydroxyproline levels and neovascularization with CD-31. Results: In both groups, there were no significant differences between control and paclitaxel-treated groups with respect to bursting pressure. The level of hydroxyproline showed a significant decrease in all paclitaxel-treated groups compared with control groups (p=0.001). Neovascularization was found to be decreased significantly on day 3 in the doses of paclitaxel 2.5 mg/kg (6.4±1.63) and 3.5 mg/kg (5.89±1.01) compared with control (8.02±0.88) (p=0.029 and p=0.005, respectively). There were no significant differences in neovascularization in either groups on postoperative day 7. Conclusions: We suggest that intraperitoneal administration of paclitaxel during surgical procedure decreases the hydroxyproline content and neovessel formation that are necessary for healing of intestinal anastomosis